Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This was my first (and last!) experience using Hermes to deliver a parcel. I learnt the hard way...    I posted a valuable item (my precious & perfect guitar) with Hermes that was delivered damaged. I paid for insurance and after an absolute nightmare getting in touch with them, then waiting 28 days, they said it is not covered.   However the recipient stated there is signs of rough handling to the package, therefore Hermes are still at fault. When I responded with this to them they replied:   ..."I assure you that any damage is not a lack of care from our couriers; they take great care of all our parcels in transit. Any damage done to parcels within our delivery process will have occurred whilst being sorted by the automated, heavy machinery within one of our large depots."   Surely this does not absolve them of liability?!   I sold my guitar on ebay for £265 and have had to refund this plus the £20 postage I paid in good faith that my guitar would reach the buyer intact.   I now am out of pocket and with my once pristine guitar damaged.   I am heartbroken about it, plus the stress it's caused, was only even selling due to being a new mum and not currently working, I could cry (well I have several times). Anyway was just looking for any advice re: attempting to take further cheers.
    • Pleased we can at least agree on that.  
    • I will await the final confirmation tomorrow I also attach the Draft Order, please can these be checked Andyorch and BankFodder before I submit these online tomorrow I of course will amend the details to add the names etc before I send this. In the Leicester county court Claim No. ... Before District Judge ……… Dated 23//10 20… Claimant/s Mrs XXXXXXX   and Defendant Goosedale Draft Order     IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. . Pursuant to CPR 19.4.1 and CPR 19.2.2 (a) it is requested that a second claimant Mrs xxxxxx be added to this claim. It is desirable to add the new party so that the court can resolve all the matters in dispute in the proceedings. 2. The proposed amended particulars of claim be reserved Pursuant to Practice Direction 19 ( 2.1 ) ###### End of Order ######     Amended Particulars of claim for N1.   The claimant and second claimant joinder seek reimbursement of £7700 paid to the defendant on XXX date 2019 in respect of a frustrated contract for a wedding venue booked for the XX date 2020 and which was cancelled by the defendant as a result of implementing government restrictions in respect of Covid 19 Legislation.The principle claimant makes this claim pursuant to Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. The defendant has refused to refund the contract price. The claimant seeks £7700 plus interest plus costs.     N244_web_0818 COMPE.pdf
    • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is again urging consumers struggling financially during the pandemic to seek help - after discovering that 12 million people have "low financial resilience" View the full article
    • https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WrcF2oEOydGXCZYwhZcYB7QmnP_9jNaQ/view?usp=sharing I think I have figured it out. Sorry   
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Bus lane ticket in Uxbridge.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3738 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

So on 30 June I'm driving through Uxbridge, a place I don't normally go, and I stray into a bus lane.

 

Today I'm served with a notice by the London Borough of Hillingdon under the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003 saying that I strayed into a bus lane and am required to pay £60.00 in 14 days or £120.00 in 28 days. For the avoidance of doubt it's a bus only street.

 

I then compare the ticket to the act and I find a rather subtle defect.

 

The Act says that:

 

A penalty charge notice under this section must—

(a) state—

(i) the grounds on which the council or, as the case may be, Transport for London believe that the penalty charge is payable with respect to the vehicle;

(ii) the amount of the penalty charge which is payable;

(iii) that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice;

(iv) that if the penalty charge is paid before the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the date of the notice, the amount of the penalty charge will be reduced by the specified proportion;

(v) that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable;

(vi) the amount of the increased charge;

(vii) the address to which payment of the penalty charge must be sent; and

(viii) that the person on whom the notice is served may be entitled to make representations under paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to this Act; and

(b) specify the form in which any such representations are to be made.[/quote]

But the ticket doesn't mention Paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the Act! It just says, "The grounds you on which you may make a representation are set out below" then paraphrases the grounds.

 

 

Would this be worth running with? It is a bit subtle, but considering that there was that adjudication in which they struck out tickets for mixing up date of service and date of notice...

 

 

I'd appreciate a fairly swift reply, thankya.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't help on your specific point but this was presumably in Vine Street which is the location in Hillingdon with the highest number of tickets and Hillingdon is one of the largest issuers of tickets outside central London.

 

On that basis one would think they had got it right by now, but over 10 years I have regularly had their PCNs cancelled, including due to non-compliant signs and road markings.

 

Also Hillingdon is about top of the league at PATAS for suffering successful appeals so they don't seem too concerned about doing it right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks to Tony P for providing the location (if indeed it is the correct one!) so we can look on street view.

 

There appears to be 2 bus lanes here both of which appear to dodgy from a signage point of view. If we are talking about the one from the junction with Cricket Field Road, my observation is that there are no advanced indication that traffic neds to turn left or right prior to the mini-island. I would of thought that there should of been a 'no through road' sign (reffering to straight on) with a plate underneath stating 'except buses and cycles). The signage at the start of the bus lane seems to be compliant as does the road markings.

 

The other 'bus lane' which starts in the middle of the carriageway seems to be the worse of the 2. There is no advance signage or sigange at the start of the bus lane what so ever although the road markings make it pretty obvious it is a bus lane/gate. There appears to be signs at the traffic lights themselves by which time you would already be well inside the bus lane before you saw them. I would also suspect that the lights there would only be triggered by a bus approaching them.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi there,

 

Thanks to Tony P for providing the location (if indeed it is the correct one!) so we can look on street view.

 

There appears to be 2 bus lanes here both of which appear to dodgy from a signage point of view. If we are talking about the one from the junction with Cricket Field Road, my observation is that there are no advanced indication that traffic neds to turn left or right prior to the mini-island. I would of thought that there should of been a 'no through road' sign (reffering to straight on) with a plate underneath stating 'except buses and cycles). The signage at the start of the bus lane seems to be compliant as does the road markings.

 

The other 'bus lane' which starts in the middle of the carriageway seems to be the worse of the 2. There is no advance signage or sigange at the start of the bus lane what so ever although the road markings make it pretty obvious it is a bus lane/gate. There appears to be signs at the traffic lights themselves by which time you would already be well inside the bus lane before you saw them. I would also suspect that the lights there would only be triggered by a bus approaching them.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Thanks folks.

 

It was indeed Vine Street. I'll scan and post the ticket if you want.

 

Thing is, Street View only offers a view of that road from the angle opposite to the one I was driving in. I fear I may have accidentally gone up a pedestrianised street from the other way...

 

Also, can anyone clarify whether, with bus lane tickets, the 14 day reduced fine period is stayed during a representation, like it is with parking tickets, or whether it rolls on regardless.

 

Also of note, which to me is just BEGGING for legal challenge, is the fact that you can only view the CCTV evidence on alternate Tuesdays at the Civic Centre. Unfortunately I have not the time nor the expertise in road traffic law to do that (I am in law, but in landlord & tenant law.)

 

Still, I'll have a look at it in Street View and compare it with the acts and bung in my representation on both dodgy signage and dodgy notice grounds over the weekend.

 

Also, would I be right in thinking that dodgy signage is under ground (b) - the contravention did not take place, because it cannot be an enforceable traffic regulation without the right signage?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Post the PCN. Go back and take pics of all signs and post them. Presumably you have made an informal appeal (or paid) by now? If the signage is non-compliant, the contravention did not take place cos the location is unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have indeed - rejected. I Google Street View'd the signs (I'm not going back to Uxbridge to risk another ticket, I hate the place already and my camera's dead). I'll do some work on my next step over the weekend, because tomorrow I've an interview for a job in Hackney ("This is Hackney, sir. People carry guns.")

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have indeed - rejected. I Google Street View'd the signs (I'm not going back to Uxbridge to risk another ticket, I hate the place already and my camera's dead). I'll do some work on my next step over the weekend, because tomorrow I've an interview for a job in Hackney ("This is Hackney, sir. People carry guns.")

 

I spent 3 months working in Hackney Never ever again :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...