Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No car...No refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Very long story short(ish)...

 

On Mon 22-2-10, my partner purchased a Peugeot 406 Saloon, 2.0hdi LX from a used car dealer. On Fri 26-2-10, we went to collect the vehicle, after a short drive the vehicle suffered a drastic loss of power, and, thick trails of black smoke poured from the exhaust, the vehicle was unable to rev past 3000rpm and excessive fuel consumption was noted.

 

Fast Forward....

 

On Wed 21-4-10 the vehicle was returned to the dealer to provide a forth and final opportunity for repair (mechanic A) has failed 3 times to repair, so vehicle WILL be taken to mechanic B. On 18-5-10 a letter was sent stating sufficient time for repair had been provided and as the dealer had still made no attempts to repair the vehicle we were formally rejecting the vehicle and requesting a full refund.

 

To date: The vehicle is still with mechanic A, actual location and mechanics details have been refused, (asked for several times inc recorded delivery) also requested copies of invoices for vehicle appraisal and any repairs, dealers details (surname is needed for small claims court) all have been refused.

 

Mon 21-6-10 filled for small claims court, vehicle was not:

 

• of satisfactory quality (taking into account its age and mileage)

• meet any description given to you when you were buying it, and

• fit for the purpose (for example, to get you from A to B safely).

 

surname was found on 1 of the recorded delivery letters the dealer signed for so fingers crossed its the right name!! (on all other letters the signature cannot be read and the printed name is the business name).

 

the dealer now the defendant had the claim served and as expected has so far not responded so we will be applying to enter judgment when his time is up, then apply for a warrant of execution as no doubt we shall have still heard nothing.

 

 

QUESTIONS???

As anyone who has won there case ever actually received a refund?

 

What are we supposed to do about the vehicle in the mean time?

we have the log book and m.o.t etc but no idea where the car is, now I cant see it getting any speeding tickets or anything but as my partner is still the registered keeper of the vehicle we are still responsible for it.

 

If it gets to the point of enforcement would the bailiff be able to recover the vehicle and sell it to raise part of the refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order, you need to do more to ensure you are naming the correct defendant. You cannot leave this to chance. If a firm, it is the company you sue, not an individual. If the dealer trades under a trading name that is not a Ltd or Plc, you need to sue him by name, NOT the name of someone who signed the postal receipt (although you may be lucky and this WAS the correct name).

 

Assuming it is, he doesn't enter a defence and you get judgement, Bailiffs will only look at the premises you name as the contact point. If the car is not there, then will not form the basis of their distraint. Banks accounts are better, as the price of cars in a yard can be mercurial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya, yer i know the name thing is pretty weak and its going to be down to luck that he just signed the recorded delivery without thinking and printed his own surname instead of the business name, we have been trying to confirm his details but citizens advice could only suggest checking with electric/water company (who would be unable to help) or to see if the police could help but they said unless we reported the car stolen (as he wont tell us where it is) then it is a civil matter and they wont get involved. He is a sole trader so his name is needed for the small claims form, he should have his details displayed at his yard and should also include his details on the sales invoice but he hasn't.

 

Its his last day to reply to the claim today, when you said about a bank account is that the third party debt order? Don't know much about the small claims court!

 

really grateful for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citizens Advice prove again they are a waste od space. Don;t they think the DPA exists for water companies...? Where you could chec is the Valuation Roll in your library, it notes the trading names and addresses of all business councl tax payers, and is a public record.

 

You first need a judgement in your favour, then he has around 28 days to pay. If not, you send in the bailiffs. YOU need to know who his bank is - if you have the full details, great - in not, branch or bank nam,e un decreasing levels of usefulness. You need to give this info to the bailiffs, as unless it is obvious to them on a fiest visit, they'll not pursue this angle for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what i thought about needing the bank details, its been hard enough trying to find his name never mind bank! then there is always the chance that he only has one account that is a joint personal account (payed in cash so unsure if he has a business account). I read there is a order to obtain information to call him in to court and give details of his bank but, will there be any point in that? as he could just keep the account empty until after he receives the third party order, thats if he even showed up.

 

Will try the valuation roll, never herd of that.

 

He advertises on auto trader so we can keep a check of his stock, normally has around 20 cars on there so if the bailiffs went to the yard they should be able to recover goods to sell at auction.

 

going to look into applying for judgment later today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to disappoint, but the bailiffs selling at auction is a long shot. They are there to get your money. Cars are not money, and they will not employ a contractor to take a random number of vehicles in the hope they make the money owed to you, and their expenses. You'll be expected to fund this route, with the risk that if you take too many or too few you;ll have big problems later.

 

Hopefully he pays up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest i don't think his going to do anything he can get away with avoiding, the system seems to be a waste of time and just increases the amount of money lost by having to pay out for the courts...but its either try or bend over! It does state that the court doesn't guarantee any moneys owed will be returned even if the case is won.

 

good point about the bailiffs and selling goods at auction, I just thought that would be the easiest way around.

 

If we apply for the order to obtain information, what would happen if the dealer did not show up at court to give his bank details?

 

and

 

If he did turn up and gave the information and funds where available in the account would the third party order be enforced there and then or would he be expecting it in the post?

 

the order freezes the account from when the order is received, so the obvious thing to do is keep the account empty which again just results in us being out of pocket with no chance of recovering costs.

 

sooooo confused :confused: really don't know what to do to give us the best chance of getting the refund

Link to post
Share on other sites

just had a look, and you were correct about having to pay the bailiffs fees to recover goods to sell. It basically says that we have to make a promise that if money/goods cannot be recovered we pay there fees, or there fee will be taken from any money raised from the sale of goods and then remaining balance will be given as refund, if the money raised doesn't cover the dept owed we then have to decide to either write off the remainder or request the bailiffs return, and any amount over the dept will be returned to the dealer.

 

at least this way there is some threat to the dealer if he still refuses to pay, the warrant of execution is supposed to enforce the judges decision but if the dealer still says no the judge will simply say thats not my problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

and the story continues....

 

We received the acknowledgment of service on fri 16/07/10 and the ever so lovely dealer is now blaming us for the faults on the vehicle and has issued a counter claim for £200+...wtf

 

The dealer has stated that the vehicle was in good working order when purchased by my partner and that the vehicle needs flushing out, striping down, cleaning and some parts replaced because petrol instead of diesel has been put in the vehicle, causing all the problems with the vehicle!

 

We last saw the vehicle on 21/04/10, when it was last returned to the dealer for a fourth and final opportunity to repair the faults first reported to the dealer on purchase. The dealer is asking for £200.00 storage cost of the vehicle at £20.00pw (22/04/10 - 01/07/10) +£20.00 every week after that!

 

The dealer has tried to repair the vehicle 3 times and failed, he has in writing said that a full inspection has been done on the vehicle, with no mention of petrol been put in the car until now 5 month later. If he has put the vehicle in storage we did not know about it and should not have to pay for this?? we have been asking for months where the car is and he refused to give any information.

 

We phoned peugeot and asked what would happen if petrol was put in a diesel?? they said the car would run for maybe a mile and then cut out, a diesel engine cannot run on petrol, the car would need to be towed to a garage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If petrol has ever been put in the car, we believe either petrol had been put in before purchase by my partner, or the dealer has put petrol in after we last returned it to cover up the real issues

 

What would happen/symptoms if petrol was put in a diesel, and not cleaned out properly then diesel put back in and driven??

Edited by jelly-82
question added
Link to post
Share on other sites

and the story continues....

 

We received the acknowledgment of service on fri 16/07/10 and the ever so lovely dealer is now blaming us for the faults on the vehicle and has issued a counter claim for £200+...wtf

 

The dealer has stated that the vehicle was in good working order when purchased by my partner and that the vehicle needs flushing out, striping down, cleaning and some parts replaced because petrol instead of diesel has been put in the vehicle, causing all the problems with the vehicle!

 

We last saw the vehicle on 21/04/10, when it was last returned to the dealer for a fourth and final opportunity to repair the faults first reported to the dealer on purchase. The dealer is asking for £200.00 storage cost of the vehicle at £20.00pw (22/04/10 - 01/07/10) +£20.00 every week after that!

 

The dealer has tried to repair the vehicle 3 times and failed, he has in writing said that a full inspection has been done on the vehicle, with no mention of petrol been put in the car until now 5 month later. If he has put the vehicle in storage we did not know about it and should not have to pay for this?? we have been asking for months where the car is and he refused to give any information.

 

We phoned peugeot and asked what would happen if petrol was put in a diesel?? they said the car would run for maybe a mile and then cut out, a diesel engine cannot run on petrol, the car would need to be towed to a garage.

 

 

Bring it on!! The seller is obviously a fool. As you point out, he has had ample time to raise this as a 'defence' previously. The courts are not stupid. Any judge will know that anything could have happened to the car after you handed it back. You already have a judgement on this so my advice is use it. If you have recieved an official counter claim from the court, then file a defence out-lining that at no point during the various times the seller attempted to repair the car, was the wrong type of fuel used as an explaination. The seller is only saying this now 5 months after the event. In any event, from the 21/04/10 as far as you are concerned the car had been rejected and thus returned to the seller so how can you be responsible for storage costs?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scenario A:

Petrol was put in the car then drained but not cleaned then re-filled with diesel causing all the issues, then sold by the dealer to my partner knowing there would be problems.

 

scenario B

The cause of the problems is still unknown/unable to be repaired and petrol has been put in to cover the problem, with only the dealers word that petrol has been used, (seen has he has kidnapped the car, and wants to charge us for this) we cannot check to see if the problems have changed.

 

either way hes pretty dumb and this is just the latest story

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...