Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
    • Is this place near to you? I ask for two reasons. If you can easily go back, then get photos of the signs.  On GM and Parkopedia there are various comments about the signs being pants. Also go back to the school uniform shop and ask the manager there for contact details for the retail park (which I've Googled & Googled and got nowhere).  The school uniform shop will just be tenants of the retail park, they won't be able to do anything.  It will be the retail park that called EPC in, and we've seen loads of cases where the organ grinder has intervened and called off the monkey.  As for EPC, aye, ignore them until LoC stage.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC BANK - Tricky Questionnaire?


Vonn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

This is my first post, but have looked in many times, very helpful site, but my question is this:

Has anyone rec'd a questionnaire from HFC Bank by any chance? If so, how did you fill it in, it asks "how would you have paid us the loan back if you became unemployed"? What sort of question is that!:eek:

I'm trying to claim back mis-sold PPI from 2001/2002, the thing is if I was forced to have it or be refused the loan, which is the best way to answer the question,:confused: any advice please, it's all welcome.

 

Cheers

Vonn

Edited by Vonn

Vonn

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH: it won't matter what you put.

 

its a load of bull and just a delaying tactic.

 

put down whatever you want

infact make it funny if you like.

 

if you want a hand

 

then post it up and we'll play a game of who can fill in the most obnoxious answers

 

HFC are the pits, and will not do anything to help you.

 

expect to go to the FOS in 8 weeks from the day you post it back

 

in fact, i'd put that on a cover letter when you send it back.

 

DO NOT give them any pers or financial info at all.

 

they'll use it against you

 

scan it up

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

browse to your pdf file and upload it

hit close this windows at the bottom below upload it box

 

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply DX, I've not claimed before, but am gonna try my luck now.

I wrote to them asking if PPI had been included in a loan I had with them, maybe 2001/2002 and finished it in 2004. They wrote back and said yes, but I'm not sure if it was attached without my knowing or agreed to, anyhow I did have PPI attached, now they have sent me a questionnaire and are asking -

Suitability and Exclusions

(a)If your earnings had ceased during the term of the loan, how would you have maintained your regular repayments?:-x

That's a tricky question!!! They want it back in 10 days:eek: (5 now, it took 5 days to get to me)

Anyhow for now, I just sent off a postal order asking for the original agreement.

Any advice welcomed.

Vonn

Vonn

Link to post
Share on other sites

its just a delaying tactic.

 

TBH it matters not what you write

 

just dont give them ANY more pers details or financial details than what they already have.

 

put amusing answers down if you want.

 

or N/A

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This is my first post, but have looked in many times, very helpful site, but my question is this:

Has anyone rec'd a questionnaire from HFC Bank by any chance? If so, how did you fill it in, it asks "how would you have paid us the loan back if you became unemployed"? What sort of question is that!:eek:

I'm trying to claim back mis-sold PPI from 2001/2002, the thing is if I was forced to have it or be refused the loan, which is the best way to answer the question,:confused: any advice please, it's all welcome.

 

Cheers

Vonn

 

I would tell them to stick the questionnaire where the sun don't shine. If they had sold you the PPI in the correct manner in the first place, they would already have their answers.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I've just rec'd a reply from HFC Bank regarding my 2 accounts which were paid in full in 2003.

It states "The bank is not required to provide information under Section 77 of the Act when a loan agreement has been paid in full. We confirm account number: XXXXXXXX closed on March 2003.

Please note we have conducted a reasonable search for account no: XXXXXXXX and at the time of request it cannot be located. Details of any account which has been closed over six years will no longer be held on our systems".

 

Can I take this matter further...or not? They cannot find the one account and the other they say, the Bank is not required under section 77, to provide any info.

 

Any help please is very much welcome.

 

Vonn

Vonn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I've just rec'd a reply from HFC Bank regarding my 2 accounts which were paid in full in 2003.

It states "The bank is not required to provide information under Section 77 of the Act when a loan agreement has been paid in full. We confirm account number: XXXXXXXX closed on March 2003.

Please note we have conducted a reasonable search for account no: XXXXXXXX and at the time of request it cannot be located. Details of any account which has been closed over six years will no longer be held on our systems".

 

Can I take this matter further...or not? They cannot find the one account and the other they say, the Bank is not required under section 77, to provide any info.

 

Any help please is very much welcome.

 

Vonn

 

 

sar them is what you should have done

 

this is just more delaying tactics

 

sar them!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why have you started another thread on the same subject?

 

dx

hit the red warning triangle and ask for them to be merged.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try a Subject Access Request but I fear they may say they dont keep ANY records over 6 years again.

 

If youre planning to take action against them its harder to do it after 6 years anyway.

 

the 6 years only starts to run from the end of the agreement ,so they must keep copies under the money laundering act..

so SAR THEM if they refuse this time send at the same time as the SAR a copy letter to the INFORMATION COMMISIONERS OFFICE along with copies of what they have sent you so far and let HFC know you are doing this as a matter of course ..

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...