Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arnold Clark--are they avin a larf or what?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4912 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Several folks on this site have complain about defects on cars bought from Clark. The gist o the moans are that Clarks canny or winnae sort the faults.

Ma China is in this group, and got a letter frae Clark. On the foot o the letter it showed that a firm called GTG training is owned by Clarks.

 

Google GTG training and WET yourself.

 

If Clarks mechanics canny sort these cars, it disnae say much for the training firm, dis it.

The chap thats hivin all the bother wae MAZDA cars posted that he went to Watchdog the day. He also took a divit o letters from other CAG members to show Watchdog all the problems that folk are havin with these blasted DPF's and FAP's on many cars nowadays, which are costin an arm and a leg tae service. It pointed out thit the unsuspectin public are buying these motors without kenning what the long term costs are.

 

If Mr. Craig happens to read this, I can thoroughly recommend some bedtime readin for him and awe the heid bummers in Arnold Clark's.

It's a new document fae the OFT stating awe the rules and regulations for car dealers. Aye big and sma. They should study this document and put the contents intae practice, paying particular attention to section 7, 7.1

Section 6 of the CPR's is also worth a good read.

Wid readin this pit them aff their sleep?:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wid readin this pit them aff their sleep?:rolleyes:

 

I doubt it. Most of the posters on CAG are English so I would guess AC would expect posts to be in English too so they won't be expecting to need a tanslator! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if it was in "real English" Crem a Scottish firm would understand that?

 

Reminds me of a tale I heard about the Foreign and Commenwealth office where they sent a congratulations message in Welsh to the new Welsh Parliament who duely returned it asking for it to be sent in English!!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Arnold Clark Company Rep

Lasertung, thank you for your post, we are in posession of the OFT document having obtained this on the day of release. We are in the process of ensuring all Managers receive a copy.

 

Regards

 

Alasdair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Crem. Forgot to add that translation into English available at extra cost!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(AC tactics?) My next post will be in my native DORIC!

Topic heading was in English----perhaps London area?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lasertung, thank you for your post, we are in posession of the OFT document having obtained this on the day of release. We are in the process of ensuring all Managers receive a copy.

 

Regards

 

Alasdair

 

Aye, Have nae doubt that all the managers will get a copy, ------BUT, WILL the RULES BE IMPLEMENTED IN FULL?????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lasertung, thank you for your post, we are in posession of the OFT document having obtained this on the day of release. We are in the process of ensuring all Managers receive a copy.

 

Regards

 

Alasdair

 

What Alas "dan Dare" (I think we should nick name him this) forgets is that this is nothing NEW!!!

 

It's just a reiteration of current consumer regulation updated.

 

So what he implies is that "Arsehole Clark" as it is allegedly known, didn't know about the regulations in the first place! Consequently the company feels it important to roll out an OFT document that they claim to comply with anyway. And this is a company that get's awards for customer service???

 

What a faux pax!

 

Perhaps Dan Dare, has been trained by the AC training company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fit i was really trying to get at Heliosuk wis what will ACAL's reaction be to these new or regurgitated regs.

Will they negotiate with OFT to get the rules watered down?

Will they move the middle finger in an upwards direction at the OFT, and say we are so big that these rules don't apply to us?

Or as I suspect, will the brains (wide boys?) in ACAL work very hard to find loopholes in the regs. that they will milk to their ain advantage?

Time will tell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heliosuk, I don't quite understand why you say that Mr. Craig be given a nick name of "Dan Dare". I for one are not receiving any entertainment or amusment from the gentleman.

In fact, since pressing him to inform me when my car is to be properly tested, he has stopped replying to emails.

Furthermore, when trying to get information from AC personnel on details of replacement cars available, all goes the usual "Quiet". Can't even get a rough estimate of cash required to exchange cars. This task, i understand is to be undertaken by two or more of AC employees.?????

To give Mr. Craig the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he is not at work just now for a variety of reasons.

Since you know of the background to this sorry saga Heliosuk, you will be aware that the proceeds of a house sale can buy a Lot of Publicity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But he was a "Super Hero" saving the world (read, consumer here) from the evil Martian Empire (read, Arsehole Clark).

Dan Dare rhymes with Alasdair.........."aving a laugh" .........gedditt?

 

Seriously though, Mr Craig comes on here on behalf of AC saying he is willing to help and then e mails he will do this and that but he never follows through does he?

 

Ok giving him the benefit of the doubt he wants to help but if he going to do the talk so to speak then he needs to do the walk which on evidence so far he can't.

 

The problem you have scania is that you have made it quite clear what the situation is and what is needed to resolve it but they won't budge I reckon, because they 1: Don't understand the issue 2: Have incompetent management that don't know what to do as they are in a corner and 3: Rely on a bunch of "merchant bankers in Slough" who have no understanding of the problem whatsoever.

 

It's an easy problem to solve one way or another. Do the tests that I have suggested and that will prove categorically one way or another if there is an issue and they (AC) should pay for it.

 

Why they don't want to do this is beyond me unless they have something to hide, which I think is the case, and probaly explains why they and the Slough connection won't release the full info.

 

If I was in AC's position and I was certain what we had done was right then I'd present you with the results and say that's the end of it .........but they won't will they.

 

Unbelievable really.

 

I wouldn't waste any money on publicity. I think there is enough on here for the time being hence Dan Dare occasionally picking up on stuff he obviously gets out of his depth with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I suppose that just about sums it up Heliosuk. But it is interesting to note that it was after the large article in the Sunday Post (ac using guys van), that Mr. Craig started on this particular website.

Surely, no company can go on indefinately when adverse publicity abounds.

The penny appears not to have dropped with the Clark organisation, that I now have the time and money to keep this complaint going indefinately.

I would prefer not to use the term A-s-le Clark, as other posters have used terms such as Arnold Shark or Al Capone, which may be seen as more appropriate, don't you think?

Edited by scaniaman
Link to post
Share on other sites

Must join that site and make it 134,001 LOL.

I know that the AC complaints site goes back several years, which begs the question "Why are the authorities not doing something about them?"

Realistically, I think that only Joe Public can sort these people out by not being so vulnerable and buying elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
Lasertung, thank you for your post, we are in posession of the OFT document having obtained this on the day of release. We are in the process of ensuring all Managers receive a copy.

 

Regards

 

 

Well Ali, It wis fower months ago that you got the OFT report, yet nithin has changed in the wye your people treat punters. Only twa wicks bye I wis witness to another case whaur a punter wis bumped on fit should hae been a warranty claim, bit in the interests of safety the punter pied up jist tae mak the motor tempory safe but certainly no richt. Efterhind i met up wi this punter and left ma contact number, sayin that if they hid an unexplained accident I wid staund up in coort an testify that the fault had been registered but no action taken by the clark dealership involved even although the car wis still under six months fae purchase. Jist be reminded Ali that the great Arnold Clark comes as much under SOGA rules as the wee chancer whoe sells a haundful o cars by the road side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...