Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breach of contract?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If this is not posted in the right area, please move it.

 

My local council interviewed and offered me a 1 year contract as a self employed Nutritionist. I was informed that the contract would be sent as soon as the references were received and in good order. Both referees sent great responses and meetings were arranged by the council for me to attend. I considered myself employed from the beginning of the month (June) as this is what I was told and the meetings had been arranged in that period. After 2 weeks had passed, I had no contract was receiving little response to emails about the delay in issuing the contract. I eventually received an email stating that there was an investigation and that I should hold tight. When I asked the nature of this investigation, the email though read went unanswered. I then followed it up again, same issue. I have now received an email stating that there was an issue with the references and due to the delay, funding has now been pulled.

 

I have since sent them an email asking to inform me to the nature of this investigation.

 

Q: Surely I have a right to know what the investigation concerns if it's regarding my references or my employment?

 

Q: Are the in breach of contract?

 

Q: I having difficulty finding anyone that is able to give me advice. If you can not help, can you point me in the right direction? ACAS, Business initiative, Law society have all come up with blanks.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q: Surely I have a right to know what the investigation concerns if it's regarding my references or my employment?

 

If they are refusing to answer emails, you could try a Subject Access Request, which might uncover whether the references were sent, and when. It might also provide more information as to what actually went on.

 

Q: Are the in breach of contract?

 

Almost certainly, but you need more information as to whether your part of the contract was fulfilled. You say that you were offered the role, but was this in writing? Not that a contract has to be written, but it does make it easier to prove what conditions were attached etc

 

Q: I having difficulty finding anyone that is able to give me advice. If you can not help, can you point me in the right direction? ACAS, Business initiative, Law society have all come up with blanks.

 

I would gather as much information as possible and consult a solicitor. You may well have a case for the breach of contract, but are very unlikely to be able to gain much out of it as any award would almost certainly be limited to damages caused by the breach. Therefore even if it is proven that a breach occurred and there was a notice period allowed by the contract, damages would probably be limited to an amount equivalent to what you would have been paid had you started work and then immediately been given notice.

 

..

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

Due to the offer (being verbal) and everything that surrounds it, I handed in my notice on a previous part time position. So now I'm out of work. This I presume could factor into the damages issue?

 

Which type of solicitor do I need.. a civil lawyer? As being self employed I have had difficulty finding someone who is qualified.

 

I will act on your advice. Thanks very much for your expertise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS page might be a useful starting point. Although it is generally the case that damages are limited to the amount that you would have received had the contract been completed and then terminated, there is an obscure piece of case law which suggests that in certain circumstances you might sue for 'loss of bargain'. The plaintiffs were successful in that case as they had resigned from steady employment in the reasonable expectation of a better paid offer of work lasting a fixed period of time.

 

As for a solicitor taking it on, I can't help with that one, but I would think it warrants further reading.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The offer of the contract was subject to good references being received, so it was a conditional offer. If the references were not what the council wanted then they can withdraw the offer.

 

As you are self employed, the normal employment rules do not apply, as you are your own employer. I assume that you are also working for other people in the same capacity?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The offer of the contract was subject to good references being received, so it was a conditional offer. If the references were not what the council wanted then they can withdraw the offer.

 

If the offer was subject to good references being received and good references were provided, then the condition is satisfied. A SAR may prove that the references were in order and the Council merely used the issue of references as an excuse.

 

Both referees sent great responses and meetings were arranged by the council for me to attend

 

Hence the need to see the references which were provided and establish what exactly could be the problem.

 

As you are self employed, the normal employment rules do not apply, as you are your own employer. I assume that you are also working for other people in the same capacity?

 

This isn't about employment law, but contract law. If a one year contract was offered, accepted and any conditions attached to the offer were met

then the OP is entitled to discover why the offer was withdrawn (lack of funding not the OP's problem, dependant on clauses in the contract), whether the contract was actually formed (SAR to assist with evidence that this was the case) and what, if any, damages might be sought (for payment which would have been made under the contract even with a termination clause, and for having given up another contract in order to take up this offer).

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...