Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, i'm posting on behalf of my father who isn't very technical so is unable to post on here, we owed 230 pounds on a council tax bill, from 2 years ago which we had no knowledge of.

 

Bristow and Sutor visited on the 25th June, my dad was outside at the time, he talked to them, they asked to come in but my father refused, walked inside and locked the door, the bailiff never gained entrance to our house.

 

Around half an hour later a letter was posted through our letterbox, containing these two letters:

 

I have removed a few personal details, name, address etcetera.

 

scan1.jpg

(on the rear are some terms/conditions and a small box with a WPA section, this hasn't been filled in or signed, also date here is 25th, where as the seizure document has a date of the 20th)

 

scann2.jpg

 

 

 

My dad hasn't signed or agreed to anything, they seem to have put a levy/seizure on his car, another point to make is that the car has disabled tax, and the taxation class on the logbook is also disabled, my Dad is currently unemployed, receiving DLA benefit.

 

Are they legally allowed to take the vehicle with what they have provided? As far as I am aware they need to have made a WPA to take the car, they haven't clamped the car and it is also parked on our driveway.

 

Another thought is, are they allowed to take the vehicle with it being a disabled vehicle, it's my fathers only means of transport, he has blue badges.

 

 

Any help and advice is much appreciated and obliged.

 

James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically speaking, I would say the levy and the way it was conducted was legitimate.

Except, of course that the bailiff shouldn't be levying on a car with disabled taxation and one that is clearly needed to support personal mobility of a disabled person. Ho hum.

 

Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents

 

Those who might be considered vulnerable include the following:

the elderly;

people with a disability;

the seriously ill;

the recently bereaved;

single parent families;

pregnant women;

unemployed people; and,

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

 

Your Father would need to write to the bailiff stating that he is vulnerable as per the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. Include supporting evidence such as recent DLA correspondence or/and confirmation from his GP. Let them know that the car is taxed in the disabled band and - if he's anything like me - also has a large blue disabled sign in the rear window.

Email to the bailiff then hard copy posted by signed for.

Copy to the Head of Revenues at the appropriate council with a covering note. Posted by signed for.

Best wishes

Rae

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

can they levy on the first visit and charge both fees?

didn't think they could?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your attendance to levy fee £24.50 cant be charged the same day as the levy fee

 

your redemption of goods fee should not be charged this fee is only chargeable if goods are removed and then returned before sale if the debt is paid

 

Is this car bought under mobility scheme

Is it on HP/finance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am 99.9% sure that they cannot levy a vehicle that is classed as a disabled vehicle. You need to contact the council and bailiff company asap and inform them. As others have already pointed out you cannot have a 1st visit fee when a levy has been made, its one or the other.

who were the bailiff company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as per the first letter, bristow and sutor car is privately owned.

 

 

Another thing this is the first time we've seen them come, and someone is always in, and both letters are 5 days apart, they was both posted by hand at the same time, surely he would've posted the one dated the 20th on the 20th not on the 25th, unless he is just trying to get more pennies by setting the dates 5 days apart, saying he's visited twice?

Edited by JamesXP
Link to post
Share on other sites

disabled tax, and the taxation class on the logbook is also disabled

 

 

send an e-mail/ recorded delivery letter to your council and ask what there policy is for levying distress on a vehicle that is taxation class disabled

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Another thing this is the first time we've seen them come, and someone is always in, and both letters are 5 days apart, they was both posted by hand at the same time, surely he would've posted the one dated the 20th on the 20th not on the 25th, unless he is just trying to get more pennies by setting the dates 5 days apart, saying he's visited twice?

Its one of their 'tricks of the trade' I am afraid, and its a 'you prove it ' scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i'm posting on behalf of my father who isn't very technical so is unable to post on here, we owed 230 pounds on a council tax bill, from 2 years ago which we had no knowledge of.

 

Bristow and Sutor visited on the 25th June, my dad was outside at the time, he talked to them, they asked to come in but my father refused, walked inside and locked the door, the bailiff never gained entrance to our house.

 

Around half an hour later a letter was posted through our letterbox, containing these two letters:

 

I have removed a few personal details, name, address etcetera.

 

scan1.jpg

(on the rear are some terms/conditions and a small box with a WPA section, this hasn't been filled in or signed, also date here is 25th, where as the seizure document has a date of the 20th)

 

scann2.jpg

 

 

 

My dad hasn't signed or agreed to anything, they seem to have put a levy/seizure on his car, another point to make is that the car has disabled tax, and the taxation class on the logbook is also disabled, my Dad is currently unemployed, receiving DLA benefit.

 

Are they legally allowed to take the vehicle with what they have provided? As far as I am aware they need to have made a WPA to take the car, they haven't clamped the car and it is also parked on our driveway.

 

Another thought is, are they allowed to take the vehicle with it being a disabled vehicle, it's my fathers only means of transport, he has blue badges.

 

 

Any help and advice is much appreciated and obliged.

 

James.

 

 

This is utter NONSENSE !!!

 

There are so many error that this is stupid. First, the fee scale on Bristow & Sutor's own documents is misleading. The statutory regulations provide for a fee of £24.50 for "Attending to levy (where no levy was made). In other words if a bailiff visits your house and is UNABLE to levy upon goods he can at least charge a fee.

 

ALTERNATIVELY, if he is ABLE to levy then he can INSTEAD charge a levy fee. He CANNOT charge a fee for both fees on the same day.

 

I have looked at the so called "Notice of Seizure" and this is strange in that it is clearly NOT dated 20th June as this was a SUNDAY !!!

 

I have read the date to be the 20th FEB 2010. If so, then by allowing a period of 5 months to elapse without enforcing the Seizure then it is CLEAR that the bailiff has abondend the levy.

 

Next point is that the bailiff has confirmed that the vehicle is TAXED. In making this statement he MUST satisfy the local authority (as they are wholly responsible for the levy) that they had SEEN the tax disc. If he had then he would have noticed that the vehicle was TAX EMEMPT. This normally a CLUE and should ring alarm bells to any sensible person that the car is owned by a DISABLED PERSON !!!!

 

Last point, the bailiff can only seize goods that he has identified. That does NOT include keys and documents !!!

 

A letter of compliant marked for the attention of the CHIEF EXECUTIVE of the local authority needs to be sent asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good spot on the 20th of February thing, didn't even notice this.

 

 

So having found this out, if and when the bailiff comes and attempts to take the vehicle which is upon our drive, displaying the valid blue badge, what should we do?

 

thanks for the reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good spot on the 20th of February thing, didn't even notice this.

 

 

So having found this out, if and when the bailiff comes and attempts to take the vehicle which is upon our drive, displaying the valid blue badge, what should we do?

 

thanks for the reply.

If the bailiff is clever he wont risk taking it, but it you get a numpty who hasnt a clue what he is doing then he may be risking his certification.

Make sure you inform the council asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good spot on the 20th of February thing, didn't even notice this.

 

 

So having found this out, if and when the bailiff comes and attempts to take the vehicle which is upon our drive, displaying the valid blue badge, what should we do?

 

thanks for the reply.

 

I have already answered this by saying that you need to WRITE A LETTER of complaint to the local authority...

 

Don't wait for a visit !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...