Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, so I'm a little upset. Why? Let Uncle Tez tell you a story. Are you sitting comfortably? Then I'll begin:

 

Once upon a time in a town called Brighton there was an area of economic decline. The local housing was cheap, filled with students and the unemployed, and largely dilapidated. The local shops were almost all small businesses, most of them just ticking over.

Because the land was cheap, there was also a huge Sainsburys in the area. Along the main road were some local cornershops, video store (still selling VHS tapes), a small market, a local Spar and a Co-Op. The other businesses included a vets, a small surgery, post office and a few charity shops and second-hand furniture shops.

The area was, in essence, like any small area within a larger town or city, and one whose economic heart was only just ticking over. Most of the money in the area was coming in from people visiting the huge Sainsburys.

 

Now one of the more ghastly establishements in this place was an old forecourt garage. Not especially large and not especially nice, it went the way of so many smaller establishements and was condemned.

The nice men from the council came around years ago and knocked it down. Then they went away again.

For years, the site was just left to rot. Nothing moved in, no business took over. The site came to be a local haunt for addicts, drunks and those relieving themselves. Rubbish built up and the place was ghastly.

 

About 2 years ago, in a stunning act of selfless social regeneration, the local community came together and took matters into their own hands.

They cleared out all the rubbish, cleaned the plot, and built a gorgeous Community Garden in its place, complete with rockeries, pathing and a small pond. Everyone was welcome and the place was a pleasure to go past.

The community loved the garden, and the project featured several times in the local paper as an example of regeneration by the community for the community.

 

Last year, rumours began that Tesco - may they burn in hell - had bought the vacant plot and decided to put a small Express store there (this is, of course, right opposite the Spar, next to the Co-Op and just down the road from the biggest Sainsbury's in the city).

Protests and letters began, but nothing really seemed to happen from Tesco's side and the garden stayed.

 

This morning, Uncle Tez was cycling past this garden and found a vast swathe of police cars blocking the road, lights flashing. PC Plod was growling menacingly at a group of perhaps a dozen or so protesters, many of them young children, who are standing in front of the enormous JCB Tesco have sent around to rip up the entire garden so a shiny new Tesco Express can be built whilst a film crew from the local paper looked on.

 

And sadly, here endeth the tale. I have a nasty suspicion that when I cycle past this garden again it won't be there any more.

 

So, excuse me if I just vent slightly when I say a heartfelt and angry **** YOU TESCO. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition, I wonder which avaricious slime ball on your local council took the back hander to allow this ludicrous piece of planning to go ahead; they could hardly demonstrate a need for another shop in this particular area, could they?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the most upsetting things is that this is going to get major coverage, if not front page, in tomorrow's local paper and - quite rightly - public sentiment will be outraged...

 

...for about 24 hours, then it will all get forgotten and Tesco will sit there with their shiny new Express (the site is nowhere near large enough to accomodate anything other than a very small store) in the place where there used to be really a rather nice garden, built at their own expense by the local community for the enjoyment of everyone.

 

Obviously, I understand how corporate business behaves and am well aware this sort of thing goes on constantly; it's more when you see it happening directly to a place you actually care about that it hits home. Not cool. Not cool at all. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

public sentiment will be outraged...

 

...for about 24 hours

That's the trouble, people forgive and forget too soon and I bet even some of the people protesting will go in when they need something that Tesco has on offer within a year of the store opening!

 

The only (very slight) solace is that it will fetch in a little bit more employment.

 

Now, Uncle Tez is normally rushed off his feet I'd imagine, but if someone was to make an effective stand against this, I'd imagine it would be an intelligent person who has the ability to make articulate arguments. Maybe even get the local council to "donate" some other land in the area for the community, and get Tesco to contribute some materials to make that over?

 

Just a thaught :p

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi well i for one will be pleased to see a bigger Tesco in my town. At present we have a smaller one but the big boys co-op are protesting. Its the dearest in town to shop at and i stopped using it a long time ago.I think it will benifit the town more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In our town Stourport Tesco already have a store a bit larger than an Express but want to build a full size store for a town of approximatley 10,000 people. In Kidderminster less than 5 miles way they have a super store so for a samll town like Stourport a large tesco sems pointless except to destroy the town.

There is already a large Co-op there and numerous small stores which will go to the wall once Tesco open. Planning appilcartion was turned down several times and then Tesco offered to build a small by pass. Plans then got approved. On a normal day the town can be grid locked most of the time so what will happen when Tesco get their way is unknown.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer, well you must be a neighbour. Im born and brought up in Stourport (68yrs) To long its been run by a few family businesses.. Im all for a bigger Tesco and the site is 200 yds from my old family home. Its about time something was done about the grid lock of traffic through the town and if Tesco do manage to build the by pass im sure its going to help.

Bewdley have a by pass so why cant Stourport.

We have tried several times to get something done about the traffic.

I can remember when Mitton Street and Vale road was two way and sometimes i think it was better, although the amount of traffic as grown over the years now.

Edited by loopylil
add a bit more
Link to post
Share on other sites

It didn't take much to figure out that you lived in Stourport. :D We used to live in Mitton Street at one time and every weekend the road was gridlocked.

On weekdays between about 4pm and 6pm the roads would come to a standstill and although we lived on the Walshes and could see our house it used to take up to 30 minutes to get home.

On Friday mornings to get into Stourport from the Walshes can take ages as the cars are all backed up the Dunley Road. Heaven forbid that they work on the bridge again. With a superstore 5 miles away I see no need for another large store in Stourport as it will kill the High Street which is already full of charity shops. Charity shops kill the economy in any town as they take but give nothing to the town as workers are normally volunteers so the wheels of the economy sort of grind to a halt.

If we start adding all the extra traffic for the Tesco which is right on the only way into the town, we are going to have a permanent gridlock. Money spoke and the plans got passed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer, well well,we must know each other then as i lived in Mitton Street too, from age of 2months until i married.

Yes i agree with what your saying but i still think Tesco will turn up trumps.

Every night even now between 4-30 and 6pm the traffic is busy with everyone going home from work. The back log from the other side of town on a friday i put down to the boot sale on the Dunley Road.

And your right now Stourport is charity town but maybe this is due to the rents/rates that Wyre Forest charge. There have been loads of people trying to run their own business s in town only to give up because of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer, i just hope your not sleeping in my bedroom then ha ha.Tony was my middle brother. As you know he passed away a few yrs ago at a youngish age.My grandad owned the shop next door and i think all the row of houses there too.Your back garden reached right down to the Stour at the back one time , no wall there then it was an orchard full of apple tree s and gooseberry bushes.We kept pigs in the pig styes there all gone now but they were happy times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than likely I have met you in person. We don't live in Mitton Stret any more. We knew Tony for many years before he passed away. One of the last things Tony did for us was to give my wife a number of Rod Stewart recordings. I went to the funeral and the wake later at the Astley Cross. I still have the sheet for the service on that day as he was a good friend. We haven't see his missus in ages, but hope she is alright. Don't want to post names.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer, I dont see her very often only when she s going shopping over the common! I was closer to my younger brother Nick and we still are close.Clash of personalaties i think you d call it between Tony and me but i still was upset when he died.Yes Tony loved his music a great Johnney Mathis fan but we both loved Queen and i still do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bar stewards are not planning a Tescos express but an enormous store in our local village. You may beat them off with the first attack to stop them, then there will be a pause of several months, in some cases years before they try again. They ALWAYS seem to win, getting round planning problems and objections. We are awaiting their return with gritted teeth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zither that is exactly what they did with Stourport. Tesco destroys small towns where there is a lot of community spirit. They never participate in processions or support any community projects.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You see it strikes me that here is a fabulous opportunity for Tesco. They've bought a tiny, and I do mean tiny, scrap of wasteland in an economically depressed area of the city.

Putting a Tesco there is insanity. It's opposite a Spar, next to a Co-Op and 2 minutes from the biggest Sainsbury's in the city. Who do they think their customers are going to be? The same local population that came together to build and enjoy the very garden they're going to rip up!?

 

By keeping the lease on the land and protecting the garden for the benefit of the community, Tesco have a marvelleous opportunity for free and very beneficial publicity. Is it going to happen? Judge for yourselves:

 

I have this morning learned that the JCB and demolition crew left the site untouched after Friday's standoff, only to find a number of protesters had arrived over the weekend and were mounting a peaceful sit-in demonstration this morning.

Tesco's response to this? It seems they predicted this, as they have turned up with a court order and have sent the police in this morning to forcibly evict, and if need be arrest, the protesters.

 

A friend of mine took the following shots on the Friday (including a gorgeously hypocritical quote from our Council leader):

 

ImageShack Album - 5 images

 

Tesco. Every little hurts.

Edited by Tezcatlipoca
Link to post
Share on other sites

Where I live is a strange place: Built in the middle of nowhere originally to rehouse blitz victims, it is now one of the largest housing estates in Europe, yet has a small but thriving community and "town" centre. It's in the middle of green belt area, yet is 30 mns away from Central London. Used by the council to temporarily rehouse the most urgent cases, it also has a lot of people having bought their council house. It was gifted by quakers, and so has an ancient covenant to how the land is to be used, and as a result has a grand total of TWO pubs (used to be 3) for the whole of the place.

 

This is the background. Now, the 3rd pub, which was falling apart, got sold to Lidl who wanted to build a store and some community housing above the store. Great idea, lots of people need to either travel a fair bit to get reasonably priced food or be held at ransom by the filthy, nasty, over-priced Co-op we have in the centre or Iceland. We used to have a small Tesco's too, but they bailed out about 10 yrs ago when the profits diminished, leaving behind a resentful community which badly needed them there.

 

Forward to now(ish). Mysteriously, Lidl's application gets turned down by the local authority. And again. And again. The site is vacant. This goes on for quite a while until one feels that Lidl will never gain a foothold here, very oddly since there really is a need for it.

 

Suddenly (and fairly simultaneously), Tesco's reappears with grandiose plans for a super, hyper, mega, humungusmarket, slap bang in the middle of our little community centre, dwarfing the little rows of shops, clogging the one and only access to the place forever, wanting to build over the current pool/gym, library, council offices etc, and in return promising to build better pool/gym etc... if they get their way.

 

Despite the huge opposition, the fact that the plan is ludicrous, would ruin whatever cohesion the place has and destroy that sense of small community, not to mention kill our little parade of shops (and the infrastructure simply couldn't cope with the influx!), and the resentment of the local people who still haven't forgiven them for bailing out when they were actually needed, Tesco's sweeps all objections and gets council approval just like that, leaving Lidl (who btw, were NOT going to be in the centre of the town, but on the outskirts) still battling their own refusal.

 

Anyone smells anything fishy there yet? Yep, me too.

 

Anyway... Lidl goes on to higher levels, over the council's head, and surprise, surprise, the inspector finds there is no reason whatsoever to deny their application, and permission to build gets granted. Hooray!

 

It gets better. A local guy went rummaging through the archives, and found THE most beautiful loophole to stop Tesco in their tracks: Part of the land they wanted to build on is in front of the pool and library is grass, a tiny little area with one bench, barely more than a strip of grass and a path. However, according to the covenant abovementioned, that area is designated leisure area, and can NEVER be used for any other purpose!!! :-D

 

Collapse of Goliath. The covenant is untouchable, and Tesco's can go f*** themselves.

 

We now have our Lidl, doing brisk trade day in day out, not impinging upon our lives in any other way than giving us a closer, cheaper way of shopping, whilst Tesco's have spent hundreds of thousands on a project which has hoepfully collapsed without chance of rearing its ugly head, all thanks to one stubborn campaigner, one quaker covenant and a tiny little piece of grass with its bench.

 

Tesco's. That little bit REALLY did help. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm, in Stourport I am quite sure that a few backhanders were passed around for Tesco plans to be approved. The majority of the residents do not want Tesco as they have foresight and know that Tesco will destroy the beauty of the town. We opposed the plans from day one when it became known. Why does a community of 10,000 people all told want a mega superstore on their doorstep when there are only four entry roads into the town?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Samer here, Surfer, I live in a place called New Addington (Surrey). If you Google Earth it, you will see that there is ONE main access road, that's all!

 

As for backhanders, well obviously we'll never know, but the blocking of Lidl at council level and passing of Tesco at the same time when there were no reasons always seemed a tad shifty. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surfer01, Last count there were 21,437 people living in the dy13 area. Think your abit out with 10,000.

As you know im all for the new Tesco and ive not yet met anyone againest it, including business people.

As for community spirit we lost our identity when we merged with Kidderminster/ Bewdley.What happened to our local paper the Stourport-News. We get the Shuttle, not much said in there about our town.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...