Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

O2 Demand Out Of The Blue


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Today I received a demand from O2 regarding an account from 2007

 

I have absolutely no knowledge of this, there is nothing on my credit file. I am actually with O2 now and have had the same number for about 10 years!!

 

Apparently they are passing it on to Lowell's and today I noticed they did a credit search on my file.

 

I have sent the std debt not recognised letter, what else can I do?

 

Just wait and see what they come up with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same with me, when you ring you will find it is lowells who answer not o2. When I queried this is misrepresentation they said it is them deciding which cases to take on, be warned xx Mine said if dont reply within 20 days o2 will pass to lowellss, but lowells answered straight away :(

 

 

Get the sniffy feeling lowellls using o2 letterheads.

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I thought that, I wouldn't phone the number on that letter.

 

I am starting to think it might just be a fishing exercise for old accounts so I might not acknowledge it and see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I foolishly rang, but the guy couldnt wait to get me off the phone, I do go on xxxxx:D Its misrepresenting as giving impression for the first time ever that o2 is interested rather than as did passing to dca without even sorting issues within their own company before condemming account. Turned out to be lowells farce and as such a lie I thought. Shows how low lowells will go xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah not good :(

 

It is strange, I am fairly sure it relates to a mobile I ordered from dial a phone but didn't like so I sent it back and canceld.

 

Strange thing is, I haven't moved house and I have had no letters or anything up till now or I would have sorted it sooner.

 

I might ring dial a phone to see what their take is on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thread being moved to this forum in a mo entitled dca shufty, regarding an o2 phone I tried to cancel within cancellation period and they blanked me from the start.

 

Did you have the company tell you to deal with 02 and then 02 tell you to deal with the company, if so similar to mine but was their own stores xx They I feel now did it on purpose to make me miss the cancellation period even though said wanted to cancel due to store not interested in helping xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly thought as not as niave as was a while ago, that 02 wanted to finally sort it out after reading the letter. Would be interested to know wether 02 knew it was being sent as their attitude to errors on their part or store disinterest in honoring contract is appauling.

 

Sad thing is o2 are a good company and I use them for payg still, so makes wonder why not sort out contract which makes them more moneyxx Any way rant over. At least they didnt fool you xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I only delt with dial a phone and it was my understanding it was all canceld and done :(

 

james did you get it in writing from the original seller, I hope so as it sounds like they didnt do their bit doesnt it? in your case.

 

Too often these firms are happy to verbally cancel or give impression account being looked into and sorted and then do nowt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With me they said they had no record of me contacting them within cancellation period, that was because they told me when rang with issue to deal with the store who sold the contract. The store refered me back even ringing from within the branch and they again say they have no record. What can a person do? At the time gave up as didnt need the stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooopsie on the multiple post. I'll ask a mod to fix :)

 

Anyhow, wait and see what they come up with and keep comunications in writing (if you decide you do need to contact them)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a letter ,which states its from 02, but on the return address, i noticed it was lowlifes.

Any way sent email to OFT reporting this misleading letter, and that it was against OFT's debt collection guidlines.

May i suggest you do the same, the more complaints the better !!!!

 

Going to do the same as genuinely thought o2 wanted to look into it this time after all the fobbing off previoulsy. Lowells after listnening to me say they will get back to me and I know it will just be threat and pay up, so am prepared, but will fight back by complaining anyhow xx:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are in a similar situation as we had 2 mobile contracts with O2 that we thoguht had been terminated and where we payed the balance off - We have now received a letter for each stating transferring to Lowells.

Whats the address to look out for please?

 

I have PO box 202 Houghton Regis on the letter ehad and 260 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshie at the bottom.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...