Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Belmont Thornton Contract Issues - Reclaming Credit Card Charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has used Belmont Thornton to try and recover charges on her credit card account.

The card issuer has in the first instance refused to deal with a third party and has subsequently made an offer to her.

There is a cluase in the Belmont Thornton contract which states :

3.6 if this agreement is terminated by the client for any reason, pay Belmont Thornton either £500 plus vat (cancellation fee) or, if the claim has already been submitted by Belmont Thornton and Belmont Thornton proceeds with the claim and the claim is successful, the fee or the cancellation fee, which ever is greater.

 

3.7 if the client terminates the agreement and Belmont Thornton proceeds with the claim, if the claim is unsuccessful and no compensation is payable to the client, the client will not be liable to pat the said sum of £500 plus vat referred to in clause 3.6 above or any monies whatsoever in respect of the cliam, and

 

3.8 for the avoidance of doubt not be liable for any charge in respect of the claim if the claim is pursued and the company pays no compensation.

 

The question I obviously have is, is she liable to pay Belmont Thornton any fees?

Should she accept the offer from the card issuer or push for more?

Edited by CHEETS 1960
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted twice yesterday and no replies so here goes again.

 

Wife has used a company to try and reclaim charges etc from card issuer. Card issuer won't deal with the company but the company might/will charge for services.

Question is, should she accept offer from card issuer or push for more and is she liable to pay the fees to the company?

Would welcome and appreciate a reply as clock is ticking with both.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've merged your other threads and unapproved the duplicate.

 

What was the offer from the Card company and did she sign anything with the reclaim folk.

 

How many letters did she write to the Card company, and who are they.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Scott,

Card issuer has offered £603.94 for quote "a refund of default charges and in order to resolve"

They have also offered not to incur any of the following charges on the account:

Late payment charge,

Over limit charge,

Return payment charge,

Returned credit card cheque charge

Tracing charge.

 

Card issuer is Vanquis.

 

No letters written. She signed an authorisation for the company to pursue the claim on her behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the total amount you claimed ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have know idea as the claim was lodged by the company.

All paper records were ditched sometime ago but as I pay this account I feel there's more to come than this. What'sthe situation with interest incurred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know with my claims against Credit Card companies, I was paid the judical 8%

Also claimed all over limit fee and Late Payment Fee.

 

I'm not too clued up on Contractual Law, so not sure how to advise you on that score.

 

The £500 + vat sounds very steep, in comparision to what they have offered.

 

You could always spend a £10 and send a Subject Access Request to Vanquis, this would let you know the score regarding how much you could claim.

 

Regarding the contract, I'll have a look around see if I can find anything.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you file a Court claim, you can charge the 8%.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

For goodness sake do not trust Belmont Thornton. They are the biggest (Edit) in town. They will (Edit) for doing nothing

Edited by maroondevo52
Removed unsuitable wording
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...