Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Damned Wescot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am having serious problems with this company - they wrote to me regarding a lloyds tsb account that was so old that it was in my maiden name, I got married over ten yrs ago!

 

I wrote to them & told them that this debt was statute barred as it was over 6yrs old & they have sent me an account statement, apparently from lloyds, it doesn't have any lloyds account numbers on it so I am unable to tally it up to any paperwork I have but I did have an idea that because on the statement it said I had made payments to an "agency" that I had dealt with this previously.

 

I then realised that I had settled this account 5yrs ago with Global Debt Recovery, my question is can Wescot now come to me for the balance, when I have a letter from Global Debt saying that they accepted my last payment as full & final settlement?!

 

I have requested an original CCA from Wescot to try to prove that this has been settled but I haven't told them I have this letter from Global yet, as I want to gather everything to make a cast iron case against them. I am just unsure as to whether or not they are entitled to persue the balance when I have settled this with another DCA.

 

PLEASE HELP:-o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure that you know what the rules about statute barred debts are.

 

Has there been any time since the debt fell due in which 6 years have passed in which you did not make any payments or in which you did not acknowledge the debt.

If the answer is yes, then the debt became statute barred and it cannot become "un-barred".

 

However, assuming that when you last dealt with it 5 years ago, it was still a valid debt, then as only 5 years have passed, the debt is not statute barred because 6 years have not passed.

I hope that you are keeping up with this.

 

Now we have to look at the idea of full and final settlement agreements.

 

I have to say that I am worried about this because my view is that they are not really binding. There is no contractual law reason why they should be.

 

It is just a matter of the creditor agreeing as a matter of honour, if you like, that they won't chase you for the rest of the debt and that they will write it off.

 

However - unless there are some other laws which I am not aware of (entirely possible), then a F&F agreement has no binding effect and in theory a creditor set about claiming the rest or could sell the remainder of the debt on to someone else who in turn will start claiming.

 

Now, it may well be that many people within the debt collection industry don't realise the fragility of a F&F agreement and they believe themselves bound by them -but maybe not.

Of course it wouldn't help the industry much of they started ratting out on their agreements even if they weren't binding - but you never know. It is a nasty industry and even amongst the Nasties - there may be some Super-Nasties who are prepared to abandon all of their scruples in order to claw away every red cent of money that they can lay their hands on.

 

All of this is to explain that your F&F is potentially nothing more than a piece of paper.

 

However, it is all you have.

 

I suggest that you write to them with a copy of your agreement and point out to them that the matter is settled and that if they bother you any further then you will report them to TS and the OFT.

 

See what happens.

If they come back and tell you that the F&F is not binding and that they intend to pursue you for the rest, then you are on shaky ground.

Let us know about it because it will be a serious matter for the debt collection industry and for the huge number of people who have already entered into F&F agreements.

 

In fact if the credibility of F&F agreements were undermined then I think that the debt collection industry would lose money as a result because there would be no point in entering into compromise agreements.

 

Before you write, however, how long is there to go before the 6 years is up?

 

If you do write then make sure that your letter very clearly states that you do not acknowledge any indebtedness to them for any reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...