Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SW Train Penalty Fair


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning I traveled to work from Syon Lane station to Putney as usual. I always use Oyster card and always have a valid ticket but this time over the weekend I forgot I dont have enough credit. I only had £1.20. :(

So I was about to use the ticket machine in the station, but it didnt take notes and there was a coin stuck in it so basically I couldnt pay by cash. I couldnt use my debit card because I didnt have any balance left.

As I arrived in Putney I explained my situation but they still made me pay £20.

I would like to appeal this as I think it is unreasonable to make me pay penalty because the ticket machine wasnt fully working. (There is no PTT machine in Syon Lane as far as I know) :(

 

I would appreciate any advice on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning I traveled to work from Syon Lane station to Putney as usual. I always use Oyster card and always have a valid ticket but this time over the weekend I forgot I dont have enough credit. I only had £1.20. :(

So I was about to use the ticket machine in the station, but it didnt take notes and there was a coin stuck in it so basically I couldnt pay by cash. I couldnt use my debit card because I didnt have any balance left.

As I arrived in Putney I explained my situation but they still made me pay £20.

I would like to appeal this as I think it is unreasonable to make me pay penalty because the ticket machine wasnt fully working. (There is no PTT machine in Syon Lane as far as I know) :(

 

I would appreciate any advice on this.

If there's no way you could have purchased a ticket at Syon Lane, you should purchase one at you soonest feasable opportunity. In your case that would be when arriving at Putney (if you had to change train to get to your destination, for example if you were travelling to East Croydon Via Clapham Junction, then Clapham would be your first available opportunity). It often helps in these situations to take a picture on your mobile phone or something, just to back yourself up. It's strange that they weren't aware of the machine being faulty though, as even if the machine itself didn't send signals to its helpdeask type place (they do that usually ya know!) you'd have thought other passengers would have had similar issues.

 

Sometimes faults aren't correctly logged though, and this leads to a break in communication. If the machine was not accepting notes, then the Revenue Staff should have been aware of this, if it was the fact that your note wasn't accepted due to an issue with you note being damaged or too crumpled up, that wouldn't be classed as a fault with the machine. In this sort of instance, Revenue Staff should use their discretion accordingly. I suggest you appeal, on the grounds that as there was a coin stuck in the machine, you couldn't use it effectively and given that your primary means were coins, it would be wrong to penalise you when you tried using a banknote that was rejected.

 

As a side note, I have witnessed broken machines in the past, and when I Revenue Staff phone up regarding the machines, there's often no fault logged, and they are showing as in full working order. Obviously the system isn't that precise then!.

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

not knowing the local area, was there a ticket office at the station?

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just two TVMs I believe...

if thats the case i'm presuming BOTH were out of order?

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I believe that there are two machines and the monitoring of these machines will show if they were out of order or not. Sometimes they don't show up immediately it is true, but a print-out of the machine log will normally show what time any faults occurred

 

If one machine was available, they will almost certainly reject any appeal and as Stigy points out, the changing point was the first opportunity to pay if the traveller genuinely could not get a ticket at the start of the journey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...