Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help require with Default Judgement/Redetermination/Set Aside/Interim Charging Order/Final Charging Order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is horrendous and a procedural/administrative error by the court, subsequently admitted by the court that has as a result caused you considerable distress.

 

Not heard of this before (although it must happen quite regularly I would imagine) and personally I would write to the court manager detailing the facts (as simply and concisely as possible to hold their interest) and ask that this is reviewed as a matter of urgency as the implications for you are severe.

 

Perhaps worth including that your case was entirely credible and with merit deserving of the courts proper attention (if you have an invalid default notice) and as such the court has failed you and not provided you with your right to a fair hearing.

 

If the court manager does not deal with this properly I'd then take it higher, they won't like that at all. Finally, don't admit to anything, that'll just give them an excuse to try and justify what they've done.

 

Quite simply the court issued the wrong document, you had every right to take the courts order for what it is and you then acted in good faith on what turned out to be entirely incorrect info. Outrageous :-x.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i cant see that writing to the court will change anything

 

the other side have won the case and you cant simply ask the court to change their decision without the "other side" being able to challenge your application

 

(i suggest you would be the first to complain if the court and the creditor discussed and came to a decision against you without your knowledge)

 

the correct course of action would be an appeal - upon which based on the facts you have stated would seem to be a good chance of success

 

what i am not clear on (and inexperienced) is to what extent your "admission" has damaged your case

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DD.

 

Yes I agree, I don't think a letter would do much good either, but as I am now not sure of the procedures avaiable to me I am trying to explore everything!

 

CPR 14.1(5) appear to give the right to apply to have an admission withdrawn - whether you can do that after a Judgement and to which court and in which form I am not clear on.

 

Clearly the admission was based on false testimony and evidence produced by the Claimant and fresh evidence has brought that to light, so I hope that in the interest of Justice some court would allow me to expose this - the court process has been abused afterall.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IDAH

 

Goog thinking but I don't think it will hold up. Once the court realises it's error, it would act to correct it. It would not re-instate the error.

 

What I was thinking is that if the court will ignore my admission because I made it by mistake, then the Judgement made could no longer be based on that admission. It would either have to be a Summary Judgement or Judgement in Default (I think). In which case I could apply for set aside... See what I mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I was thinking is that if the court will ignore my admission because I made it by mistake, then the Judgement made could no longer be based on that admission. It would either have to be a Summary Judgement or Judgement in Default (I think). In which case I could apply for set aside... See what I mean?

Hi IDAh what I meant here was that it is unlikely the court will change it's own erroneous Judgement Order, having already discovered it as an error, just to give you the opportunity to appeal. Once they realise their mistake, they will (and should) act to correct it.

 

However, the impact of their error in the process of justice would be taken into account in allowing you to appeal on any basis going forward as per emandcole's post #51 for example.

 

As DD has said, you have more than a good chance, IMO, of a successful appeal though I've tried not to comment too much on the process for that as I don't have much experience on it.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the court this morning to ask what judgment was originally entered and to ask for a copy of the N225 submitted by the claimant asking for judgment.

 

I was told I would have to write and ask for a copy of the N225 and a judge would have to approve it - i.e. it's not something I am automatically entitled to.

 

HOWEVER they confirmed that the judgment entered against me is Judgment in Default and gave me the reason for that judgment; the judgment entered on the court records is NOT judgment under admission and therefore what the Claimant's barrister argued at the set aside hearing was erroneous and I think deliberately meant to mislead the court.

 

So, procedurally, what do I do now?

 

Do I simply write to the court? Or must I begin an appeal?

 

If I need to appeal I have maybe 13 days left to do so, though I haven't received anything from the court following last Tuesday's (20th) Hearing.

 

Help!

Edited by indebtandharrased
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a very quick reply that think is very relevant. I picked up on a post that said you were told that there is no CPR that allows a set aside of a Judgment by Admission. You were not trying to set aside a Judgment by Admission, you were applying to set aside a Judgment in Default of an Acknowledgment of service. CPR 13.2 is your friend as you appear to have used 13.3 where you must show that there is a reasonable prospect of defending the claim. In 13.2 no such test applies.

 

Cases where the court must set aside judgment entered under Part 12

 

13.2

 

The court must set aside(GL) a judgment entered under Part 12 if judgment was wrongly entered because –

(a) in the case of a judgment in default of an acknowledgment of service, any of the conditions in rule 12.3(1) and 12.3(3) was not satisfied;

 

(b) in the case of a judgment in default of a defence, any of the conditions in rule 12.3(2) and 12.3(3) was not satisfied; or

 

© the whole of the claim was satisfied before judgment was entered.

 

12.3

(1) The claimant may obtain judgment in default of an acknowledgment of service only if –

(a) the defendant has not filed an acknowledgment of service or a defence to the claim (or any part of the claim); and

 

(b) the relevant time for doing so has expired.

 

IMO you have a good chance of success if you appeal as the DJ was wrong to just consider CPR 13.3 as DJ must set aside by 13.2. Forget about the DN at moment as it is irrelevant.

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further info on your admission. An appeal to set aside the default judgment is one thing and the admission is another. If you decide to appeal you are able to make other applications to be considered at time of appeal. You will need to apply for your admission to be withdrawn and you would ask that this application is dealt with at the appeal hearing imediately after the appeal should you win. This will get the admission withdrawn at that time and will stop claimant applying for judgment by admission.

 

Did you get permission to appeal at the set aside hearing? If not don't worry as you would apply for permission at same time as appellants notice filed and served. Suggest you get onto court asap as you will need the order being appealed

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Robin

 

However, I am still unclear on the position regarding the orginal Judgment and what may happen to it as a result of the order(s) made on 20th July. As you say I need to know what the Judge has finally said.

 

Is it possible the Judge could change the judgment that has been entered regardless of the circumstances? The clerk was quite clear on the phone to me today that the Judgment in Default was correct for the situation - but without seeing what judgment the Claiment requested on their N225 I cannot be 100% certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is you went to court with an application to set aside a default judgment that was wrongly entered. You made the application and therefore any other order made by the DJ was against your application. CPR 13.2 is clear that judgment MUST be set aside, there is no other option unless you agreed to or applied for a variation of the judgment.

 

IMO it really doesn't matter what the judgment was at the set aside hearing. If it wasn't to set aside the default judgment, you lost and the judgment is wrong and as in my case, can be successfully challenged. However the process is not easy.

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read from post 38 again. My earlier posts stand. It doesn't matter whether the claimant applied for judgment to be entered in default or if court made a mistake, CPR13.2 is clear.

 

I think you need to decide whether you want to take action to get the irregular default judgment removed or whether you just accept it and keep making agreed payments against the judgment secured by the charging order. Only you can make such a decision.

R

 

Thanks Steven

 

But have you read from post 38 onwards what has happened?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As the status/class/type of the original judgment is unclear, I have written the following to the court today:

 

Date: 29th July 2010

 

The Court Manager

 

CLAIM NUMBER: XXXXXXXX

 

Re: Judgment in Default dated XXh June 2010

 

Dear Sir

 

Some while ago I received a Judgment in Default dated XXh June 2010 sent out by your office.

 

At a recent hearing to consider setting aside that Judgment I was told by the Judge that the judgment had been ‘sent out on the wrong form’ and the judgment was not, in fact, a Judgment in Default.

 

To confirm this, yesterday (28th July 2010) I called the Court Office to make enquiries about this judgment and was assured by one of your office staff that the judgment was indeed a Judgment in Default.

 

So now I am confused as to the true status of this judgment as I was told one thing by the Deputy District Judge and another thing by one of your staff, so I am asking you to please confirm in writing if the judgment was, or was not Judgment in Default. If in your reply you could give as much additional supporting information as possible I would be grateful. For example, the date on the N225 form that would have been sent to the court by the claimant, and the date the N225 was received by the court and whether the claimant had ticked box A or box B on the N225. If you could let me have a copy of the N225 – for which I would be prepared to pay a copy charge – then that would perfect.

 

Please can you let me have your reply as a matter of urgency and certainly within 7 days, as I only have a limited time to make any appeal, which would require me to establish the true facts of this matter and which facts only you can provide me with.

 

Yours faithfully

 

IDaH

 

I feel that without this information, any application for an appeal would be foolhardy.

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry IDaH, I totally disagree. You have a judgment in default entered against you, is that correct? You filed an acknowledgment of service in time, is that correct? You made an application to set aside the Default Judgment, yes? Did the claimant attend the set aside hearing and object to the set aside?

 

It is totally down to you what you do, but I don't think the letter will help you at all. Because you have a Judgment in Default of replying to the claim when you did, you have a cast iron case. The only way forward if you want to challenge this is to appeal. Don't forget, the clock is ticking and if you are to appeal you should be preparing your appellants notice now. The most important part of the appellants notice is your Grounds of appeal. If it was me I'd be chasing the court for a copy of the judgment of the hearing you are to appeal. I would not send the court a letter and wait for a reply as time will run out. Please get other opinions and then you must decide the course of action you want to take.

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry IDaH, I totally disagree. You have a judgment in default entered against you, is that correct?

I don't know - the Judge said not - a court worker has since said yes. Who should I believe?

 

You filed an acknowledgment of service in time, is that correct?

Yes

 

You made an application to set aside the Default Judgment, yes? Did the claimant attend the set aside hearing and object to the set aside?

Yes to both

 

It is totally down to you what you do, but I don't think the letter will help you at all. Because you have a Judgment in Default of replying to the claim when you did,

As I understand it, I could ONLY be in default of 1) not acknowledging the claim 2) not submitting a defence in time or 3) not appearing in court. The Court Office says I was defaulted for not completeing and returning the Allocation Questionnaire in time; If they issued an allocation questionnaire (which they did) this means they know I acknowledged and know I submitted a defence. I also was in court on the day allocated for the summary judgment hearing. I HAVE NO IDEA (without asking) what they are on about - but GUESSING is surely not a good idea, in my opinion.

 

you have a cast iron case. The only way forward if you want to challenge this is to appeal. Don't forget, the clock is ticking and if you are to appeal you should be preparing your appellants notice now. The most important part of the appellants notice is your Grounds of appeal. If it was me I'd be chasing the court for a copy of the judgment of the hearing you are to appeal.

Isn't that the original judgment? In which case I have one - the one the DDJ said was sent out 'on the wrong form'. You don't, I assume, mean the order from the set aside hearing (I think that's what you said above?) In which case, I waved the original judgment I received in front of the Judge - and she had her own copy - at the set aside hearing, and she STILL said it was simply on the wrong form!!!

 

I would not send the court a letter and wait for a reply as time will run out. Please get other opinions and then you must decide the course of action you want to take.

R

 

I take on board what you have said - but if a Judge says that the Judgment was NOT in default and therfore there is no procedure under CPR 13 I can use to requeat a set aside - what am I to do (other than appeal)? An appeal can be costly - and I want to be sure of the facts - i.e. WHAT the original judgment actually is - i.e. default/summary/something else.

 

I have no clear definition - from you, anyone else or from extensive research of the CPRs and Practice Directions - of what a judgment 'entered wrongly' means. Does it include court administrative errors? Or does it mean simply what Judgment the claiment (wrongly) requested?

Edited by indebtandharrased
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have the original judgment and it is that you must be working from and if the original judgment, no matter who made the mistake, is Judgment in Default of Acknowledgment of Service then that is what it is.

 

You need both the original Default Judgment and the Judgment made in the set aside hearing to appeal. When you phoned the court, did you phone the local court or the court that entered the original judgment. If it wasn't the court that entered original judgment then phone them.

 

Also, did you post earlier that claimant has a charging order? If yes, look at the Interim Charging Order as that will refer to the judgment that allows them to obtain the ICO.

 

Also, What did you put in your application to set aside? Did you not state you were applying to set aside a Default Judgment that was wrongly entered?

 

The Judgment against you is either right or wrong. You need to act quick to resolve it if you chose to do so and yes it can be costly in many ways, not least the stress in making sure everything is done correctly and on time.

R

Edited by RobinWayRobinme
Just added more
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have the original judgment and it is that you must be working from and if the original judgment, no matter who made the mistake, is Judgment in Default of Acknowledgment of Service then that is what it is.The document sent from the court - the one I am working from - says simply Judgement in Default - it does not say in default of acknowledgement (or anything else).

 

You need both the original Default Judgment and the Judgment made in the set aside hearing to appeal. Somehwere above in this thread I was told that at a set aside hearing there IS no judgment - just an order or orders made. Is that true, or not? I am relying on posts from this thread to procede, and if I get conflicting answers you will, hopefully, understand my reluctance to rely on what one poster says over another.....

When you phoned the court, did you phone the local court or the court that entered the original judgment. If it wasn't the court that entered original judgment then phone them. As soon as I submitted a defence (following acknowledgement) the case was transferred to my local court. The Judgment in Default came from my local court The hearing for set aside was in my local court. I called the local court yesterday - where the original judgment was made - to establish whether or not the judment was a Judgment in Default - or not.

 

Also, did you post earlier that claimant has a charging order? If yes, look at the Interim Charging Order as that will refer to the judgment that allows them to obtain the ICO. The Interim Charging Order refers to the judgment I am talking about - there has been no other judgment.

 

Also, What did you put in your application to set aside? Did you not state you were applying to set aside a Default Judgment that was wrongly entered? No. I did not KNOW it was wrongly entered. In fact I do not NOW KNOW if it was wrongly entered, because I don't know WHY a default judgment was entered. Do you? Can you say it was wrongly entered from what you have read here?

 

The Judgment against you is either right or wrong.

Very true - but which?

R

 

I have answered all your points above to the best of my ability and knowledge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow

 

This seems quite incompetent from your local court. They should be able to provide you with written clarification, one way or another.

 

You may want to take both Judgemets - your original one and any new one from from the Set Aside hearing to the court and ask the court manager exactly what you should do, under the circumstances. They won't (can't) give legal advice but they can certainly help with clarifying procedure.

 

If the court acknowledges it's error, they should let you apply for the Set Aside without insisting it is a Judgement on Admission.

 

If the court insists the Judgement in Default is in fact a Judgement on Admission and therefore cannot be Set Aside under CPR, then it will have to be an Appeal against the original judgement and would involve withdrawing your earlier admission in error.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have highlighted your very first post where you say Judgment in default of not replying to claim. Your set aside Application was based upon CPR 13.3 and the threshold there is based upon the merits of your defence. As I have said from the start, your set aside and your appeal should have and should be made under CPR 13.2.

 

I will point out that I am not a lawyer and subject to other opinions on this from the forum I can offer you little else at this time.

R

Hi

 

I hope I'm not too late to do something about a recent CCJ (in default)

 

Background:

 

Fairly recently I was taken to court for a credit card debt. Having checked in here first (you will see I joined in October), I initially defended with an 'embarassed' defence as I received only basic particulars of claim issued through Northampton Bulk Centre - having made a request under CPR31.16 for a copy of the alleged CCA which did not arrive until after my deadline to file a defence. My actions of requesting under CPR31 and submitting a defence provoked the familiar abusive, bullying, intimidating communications from the Claimant's solicitors.

 

After a month or so they finally served a more detailed POC and I received my copy complete with their court bundle evidence/exhibits. They were seeking Summary Judgement.

 

Shortly before the deadline for me submitting my amended defence I lost my resolve and caved in and submitted my N9A admission, asking for time to pay, to the court and the Claimant's solicitors. I attended the hearing, as I had not been informed it was cancelled, so that I could put my case to the DJ. The Claimant had contacted the court on the morning of the hearing to say it wouldn't be necessary - surprise surprise they didn't tell me and so wasted half a day of my time.

 

Just over 2 months later I have received a CCJ against me (in default) statingXXXXXX "You have not replied to the claim form"XXXXXXX. I thought I had by returning my N9A and on calling the court they agreed they had all the papers in the court file?

 

After a couple of days of research to find out what I could/should do, and within the 14 days permitted, I wrote to the court manager requesting a re-determination hearing, as I cannot afford to pay the amount on the judgement in one lump (suffice to say it is over £8,000) and I wanted to make the points I was going to make to the DJ at the previous hearing which was "cancelled" by the other side. I had already requested time to pay on my N9A; I'm still not sure why this hadn't been taken into account when the Judgement was given?

 

On receiving the Interim Charging Order (with notice of a hearing in less than a month) I began researching how I could/should respond at the hearing. However, I also took a fresh look at the Claimants POC and evidence, only to find that the Default Notice issued (or the copy of it they sent me and in the Court bundle) does not allow the required number of days - it's only a day short if sent first class, as they claim, or 3 days short if sent 2nd class. I spent some time yesterday and found the original DN - and the envelope. It was sent 2nd class!

 

This brings things up to date, more or less.

 

Moving on:

 

During this week and over the weekend (so far) I have been trying to decide what to do, and in what order. Can any of you help me please?

 

I propose:

 

1) to apply for the Judgment in Default to be set aside, with a XXXXXXdefence that bringing the claim to court was unlawful because the DN is deffectiveXXXXXXXXXX

 

2) to ask for the above to be heard on the same day but before the hearing for the Final Charging Order, so that should the set aside be granted there will be no need to proceed with the Final Charging order and the interim charging order can be disposed of

 

3) Should I not succeed in having the judgement set aside, to have the re-determination hearing I have requested follow the set aside hearing, but preceed the Final Charging Order hearing, so that I will hopefully have a Judgement giving me time to pay. This would mean that if I did not miss any payments ordered by the court I could ask that if the Final Charging Order was given that there could be conditions attached to the Charging Order such that no Order for Sale could be sought by the Claimant if I was keeping up the payments agreed in the Judgement.

 

I think that covers it. I guess, if I could, I would like to simplify the above schedule by not having all of these issues dealt with in court inside a month. If I can't I can see me spending huge amount of time over the next couple of weeks doing nothing but preparing my cases and papers for court.

 

So, first I would ask for any comments and guidance about the sequence of events so far and what I propose and if there is any way I can ask the court for more time to prepare for the possibly 3 hearings.

 

Secondly, any help and advice with winning a set aside of the Judgement

 

Thirdly, same as above but for re-determination

 

Fourthly, fighting the Charging order and avoiding any possible order for sale that might follow.

 

I know I am asking a lot - but please help with your best advice if you can.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

 

Here is the latest Judgment which arrived in the post this morning.

 

Please can anyone comment on item number 4.

 

It seems complete nonsense to me - how can a judgment be both on admission and in default? And what should/can I do about this judgmet? It seems that for a set aside I would have to have used CPR13 and CPR14 and now an appeal is the only route - but do I have sufficient grounds, based on item 4 of this ruling, if I have a valid defence (which I think I do)?

 

Your rapid replies would be appreciated as I have less than a week to request leave for appeal.

Copy of Judgment.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...