Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I'd change justice centre to county court. I also wouldn't be including a telegraph article in the bundle. It doens't prove anything law and you don't have distribution rights on it. I also wouldn't personally break down the exhibits on the index page, normally people have a seperate page for this right before the exhibits. The main index page normally just says Exhibits to WX of [Your Name] or at least that's the format I use/see people here use, although really it makes minimal difference.   I also see that despite referencing several judgements you haven't included the EVRi one   paragraph 46 really needs to go imo it has nothing to do with anything. Your in court to apply the law to your case, not to tell the judge about a newspaper that means nothing to your claim.   I also see you've adopted the issues in dispute/not in dispute, which is also known as a scott schedule. if you are taking this approach, for things not in dispute I would say this needs to be things that are agreed between parties, not things like "There is no dispute that I am happy to supply all this evidence which is included in the court bundle." I would say that issues in dispute is to focus on the aspects of the claim that are in dispute, such as whether liability is limited by insurance or not, so I'd be changing that accordingly.   BF should be along shortly to advise on things.
    • J, I just numbered them like that; once the witness statement is made, I'll add it to the pages.   The court date has been set as 02 July 2024. Please find attached V6. I will send an unredacted to the email.  claim budle_V6.pdf
    • I'm afraid that I have tried downloading it three times and each time I am getting an error message. Would you mind scanning it again please and uploading it again. I understand that JK has managed to open it but others may not. Thanks
    • I can see that.   In this case, I'd email both that receipt and your tracking label to evri's small claims email and say that is the information you have.   They'll figure it out from there I'm sure
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - Charges


Blue-eyed-girl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have hit the lull that my husband has not worked since christmas properly and we have tried to ask welcome for some understanding and time to get back on track. The are not very forthcoming at all. We borrowed 14,000 altogether over 10years. we are paying £343 a month but their capitalisation charges are just as much so therefore will our loan ever come down??

 

What are these charges that are so much? Can they threaten repossession even if they have not asked for an income expenditure details how can I rid them of harrassing us continually and being charged for these calls. My husand has reached the end of his teather and I am so near with them too.

 

Please advise, will be ever so gratefull

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blue capitalisation is what is commonly known as interest hope that helps a little.

 

Have you told them in writing you want no futher verbal (telephone) contact?

 

Dont panic about being charged for calls that is something you can claim back.

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear they are harrassing you so much. I only joined this forum a few weeks ago so am not the best to advise you but we are in a similar situation. The loan with welcome is not mine but my partners and i felt so strongley about they way they treated him i joined here for advice. We send off a letter about telephone and doorstep harrasment over 2 weeks ago but sadly that hasnt stopped them, i would say if anything they are worse than ever! We are the end of our tether with them and their threats. Also my partners loan is 103 a month or something like that and each month they are adding on 106 capitilisation so it will never be paid off, how can that be legal???!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

HELP! I have today received a letter from Welcome Financ containing a Default Notice, I am alreadyat my wits end with them as last week I asked them to ring me so I could talk properly instead of in the office and I have not heard from them.

My husband has been out of work for quite a while, I have taken on as many repayments as possible and cannot literally afford to pay Welcome, they are aware of our situation.

Our house has gone back on the market this week as we are pretty certain that if its not sold it will almost certainly be repossessed.

I wonder if we handed the keys back to the mortgage people what order do the loans fixed to the house get settled? is there any particular order? We have the mortgage which has a suspended possession order, fixed loan with welscum and a court order on which we had on car finance which is currently being paid monthly under arrangement by myself.

We are worried sick that we dont know what to do in the right way, please any help and advice would be welcome to us ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello, does anyone know if there is a letter available to ask for charges for telephone calls and letters that they have charged me please, I have £718.00 worth of charges and I would like me money back. Please any advice or template would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, just wondered if someone can help me, I have had my SAR returned and my statement says that I have had £718.25 worth of charges in telephone calls to me and charges for letters from 4/1/2006 to 3/4/2010.

 

Can I collect this back from welcme or can they say that it is legal and stands as their charges? If so is there a letter that I can use as a template.

 

We have had enough of them ;-(

 

Any help will be so gratefully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my charges back. I believe it is wrong for them to charge interest on charges which is why they now send a letter stating if the charge is paid in the timescale interest will be added. I would write to them and tell them the charges should not have been charged interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they charge interest on their charges then claim it back the same way as PPI + 8% as well.

 

there are many threads about his .

just remember you charge them intererst from the date EACH charge was levied not enmass in one lump .

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today spoken to Welscum and they have confirmed that they do charge interest on charges applied to my account ie telephone calls or charges for letters issued.

 

So far I have according £157 worth of charges which is being charged a monthly interest of £2.63 (this months charge). How do I go about reclaiming and calculating the interest at 8%?

 

Again any help is gratefully recevied :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to do some reading up

look for simular threads here to yours

 

the process for charges+int is the same as PPI reclaim.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

So sorry to be a pain, I have looked through and am going crosseyed trying to take it all in, can I claim the interest that has been charged on my letter/telephone charges as well as the charges themselves?

 

I am not clued up on all of this.

 

Please explain as I have it in writing as I requested a SAR and received it.

 

Thank you in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Several threads merged. Please just use this one thread for your Welcome case.

 

Thanks

 

:)

Edited by slick132
edited after merging

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...