Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barrowby -v- EGG


barrowby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4839 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Barrowby,

They are not allowed to make home visits without your permission although they do. I have information sheet on how to deal with door stop collectors which details your rights and how to get rid of them. Let me know if you need it.

 

Regards DLC, here is the letter I sent them subsequent to which they passed the account back to EGG.

It may not be right for you so edit to suit....

 

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your letter dated.......

I must inform you that this account with EGG is in dispute and has not been resolved satisfactorily. I will therefore not communicate with you further on this matter and suggest you pass the account back to EGG for their urgent attention. You should be aware that this account is not permitted to be passed to a third party whilst in dispute and if I receive any further communications from you or anyone else I will report them to the relevant persons. Furthermore as you well know you are not permitted to make home visits in any event without my express permission which I absolutely refuse.

MAKE A NOTE ON YOUR FILES OF THIS:

Should you contact me further I will simply ignore your letters I have never had an account with you or signed a contract and your attempts to scare monger me with home visits will prove futile. I will however report you to the relevant authorities if you continue to harass me in any way shape or form.

Please pass the account back to EGG who I am willing to communicate with.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barrowby, keep a camera near your door. if you get a collector calling take his picture and a shot of his licence plate number. tell him to leave your property immediately.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MAKE A NOTE ON YOUR FILES OF THIS:

Should you contact me further I will simply ignore your letters I have never had an account with you or signed a contract and your attempts to scare monger me with home visits will prove futile. I will however report you to the relevant authorities if you continue to harass me in any way shape or form.

Please pass the account back to EGG who I am willing to communicate with.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

I'm a little unsure about one thing which perhaps you can clarify. I was under the impression that if the dispute started AFTER a DCA was involved then they are not under an obligation to send the account back to the OC? Am I wrong?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barrowby, keep a camera near your door. if you get a collector calling take his picture and a shot of his licence plate number. tell him to leave your property immediately.

 

Further to debt stars adice here is a guide on dealing with door step collectors(in case)...............

If you receive a visit from a debt collector, remain polite. You will make far more of an impact if you remain calm and speak slowly and carefully during the visit. If you lose your temper, you will lose control of the situation. The debt collector has far more experience than you and is very used to being dealt with aggressively. Remember that the debt collector is on your premises and if he does not have a court order, then you are the person with the authority and it is you who are entitled to control events. If you are receiving a visit from a debt collector despite already having written to make it clear that you did not want any visits, you should terminate the visit immediately and make complaints to the OFT, Trading standards under CPUT. If you allow the visit to continue in these circumstances, you will have given in to the debt collector and he will start to dominate you in the meeting.

When receiving a visit from a debt collector, you should attempt to have another adult next to you who can witness everything which goes on. It should be agreed beforehand that the witness is not to say anything at all and is there merely as a witness. If a witness starts to get involved in the conversation in any way, it is likely that the exchange will deteriorate and that you will lose control.

Do not invite the debt collector into your home. Do not even invite him into a porch. The best approach is to ask the debt collector to stand on the pavement side of your front gate if you have one while you stand within the boundary of your front garden. The debt collector will prefer to be on your premises. This puts more pressure on you. By getting access to your home - even to your front garden, the debt collector has started the process of getting access to you. Before you discuss anything with the debt collector, ask to see his identification. Take your time and read it carefully. Make notes of all the details the identity document contains. You should make sure that you make a note of the debt collector's name and the name of the organisation he is working for. If there are any additional identity numbers then you should take a note of these as well.

Make sure that any identity document is in date and make a note of that date. Once you have obtained the basic details, you can then decide whether or not to continue the visit. If an official form of identity is not provided to you by the debt collector then you should terminate the visit immediately. If the debt collector will not permit you to make notes from his identification document then terminate the visit immediately. If you decide not to continue the visit then inform the debt collector that you have nothing to discuss and that you require him to leave. Do not get drawn into any other conversation. A debt collector will try to start getting you to respond to his questions. You should simply respond "I do not want you to be here. Please leave." You should repeat this in response to any statement or question put to you by the debt collector. If you decide to allow the visit then remember the following points:- The debt collector is there by your permission. He has no court order. You are entitled to terminate the visit at any time. You are entitled to dictate the terms of the visit. You should make it clear at all times that it is you who are in charge of the visit. If you wish to terminate the visit, you can do so simply by telling the debt collector that the visit is over. You should then walk away or go into your home and close the door. You are not obliged to give reasons or to say anything other than that the visit is ended and that you want the debt collector to leave - "Please leave now" If the debt collector does not leave then inform him that you will call the police. (If you do not believe that you will call the police then do not make this threat. You will lose all of your authority and the debt collector will dominate the meeting from that point onwards.) If you do call the police, then do not be frightened to call 999. Explain to the police that you are being harassed by a man who has visited you and who refuses to leave your property. Once again, keep calm but if you are frightened, then tell the police that you are frightened and that you believe that you need help.

Be aware that debt collectors are faced with hundreds of threats to call the police every week. Almost every one of these threats is a bluff. It is likely that debt collector will stand his ground until he realises that the police really have been called. If the debt collector leaves before the arrival of the police, Then call 999 and cancel the call-out.

Once the visit is ended and you are back inside, you should immediately make a detailed note of everything that has happened and of everything which was said. Your witness should do exactly the same thing.

Do this quickly while everything is fresh in your mind.

Even if you did not proceed with the meeting and the debt collector left immediately and without incident, make a close record of everything which occurred.

If you you felt threatened by the visit and you want to complain then you should do so immediately by writing to the DCA and also complaining to the OFT and local Trading Standards under CPUT

If you want to make sure that you receive no more debt collection visits then you should write to the DCA immediately.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I could probably re-paper my lounge with the amount of doorstep threats I've had from DLC and all of their "sister" companies...the latest being Clarity.

 

For peace of mind, I tend to send them the "don't darken my doorstep" letter although have even become fed up of doing this as I've had about 3 different companies (all Hillesden/DLC) and really can't be bothered any more!

 

This has been going on for over a year now I believe.

 

Exasperated's advice above is the way to deal with them in the unlikely event that they do show up...

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a ccj from Egg through dlc. This was before I found this forum.

My agreement is from 2000 and is the "We will tell you from time to time...." variety. They have recently threatened me with bailiff action through the court which I have stalled with a payment and an N245 to vary the payments.

Is it too late to get the account put into dispute pending the outcome of the court case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a ccj from Egg through dlc. This was before I found this forum.

My agreement is from 2000 and is the "We will tell you from time to time...." variety. They have recently threatened me with bailiff action through the court which I have stalled with a payment and an N245 to vary the payments.

Is it too late to get the account put into dispute pending the outcome of the court case?

 

If you already have a CCJ then yes, it's too late to put the account into dispute.

 

I'm guessing that the court case you're referring to is in respect of the N245 to vary the payments?

 

There is always the option to get the CCJ set aside, if you didn't defend it, but you would need a very good reason for doing this, such as papers sent to wrong address, and the timescale between judgement and set aside application can also be crucial.

 

If you need anymore advice Eagleforms then it's best to start your own thread in the legal forum.

 

Best of luck with this!

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

agree with that but would add that as part of any f&f agreement you stipulate the coindition that your credit file be marked as "settled" and not as "partially settled" coz that is what they are most likely to do.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Without sounding too thick!!....how does this change the position re Prescribed Terms on
Egg
link3.gif
agreements?

 

I was waiting for a reply to my Account In Dispute letter which i sent to Egg 6 weeks ago. Received a reply yesterday with ref to Slater v Egg and also Waksman.

 

Can post the letter is it is of interest
link3.gif
.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Well....after a period of calm....I have had a flurry of activity over the past month from ARC Europe Ltd and Tremor Munn Solicitors.

 

Usual threats etc....but recent letter from ARC is offering a 40% discount for a partial settlement on my Credit File! Totally umprompted by me....end of the letter states that if I don't have the money then I had to ignore........if only I had the funds!!!!

 

Have anyone else had the same sort of offer?......or any suggestions

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting Barrowby!

 

I have recently offered just under 40% of the balance (as it was before asking for help), dlc came back offering settlement at the amount of the balance when I asked for help, I then asked who I was corresponding with as I was not sure whether it was Egg or dlc, re-iterated my offer but dlc have stated that they will not pass the offer on to Egg without me completing their I & E form!

 

Hope they're not holding their breath!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just add my experience of dealing with Egg. I received a F&F from CapQuest offering a settlement at 70% of the balance. I wrote them ofefring 50%. They rejected it. I then write to Egg direct with a 50% F&F and they ignored it. Seems they like to play tough or don't accept less than 70%??

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...