Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

We have so much debt, it seems only hope is selling house!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4235 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wilchil.........have read your thread from start to finish and with interest! Taken me hours, but great to see that with all the help and support you have had, you have done so well to date. I was a bit miffed at toymakers comments, but sadly there is always someone who oozes negativity!

Best wishes to you...... SB :wink:

 

Thanks Stonebroke. The situation is much easier to deal with now and I am so grateful to everyone here who has helped us. We couldn't have done it without them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 608
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi Tingy

 

If you asked about everything you'd never heard of you would be approaching search for universal truth (Rumsfeld and unknown unknowns).

 

Seriously though, there is a lot of stuff in templates that is not explained; our 'library' needs to become a knowledge base? The value of every thread is in its tail or tale or talents.:-D It's late, but I can't afford Latte.

 

x

 

v

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I tend to keep my own library on my computer and ensure it's backed up. I rarely use templates nowadays as I think most companies are wise to them. They make a good starting point and are very handy for newcomers to a topic area, but I much prefer to craft a letter in my own words based around the template. I tend to find they tend to have better responses as well.

 

Letters are among the most significant memorial a person can leave behind them. (von Goethe)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tingy

 

I disagree: RIP are letters. We need a more human centred and revolutionary view and I don't think your German friend was a revolutionary; I prefer " "Man is the measure of all things: of things which are, that they are, and of things which are not, that they are not" Protagoras, although I could find something more modern, notwithstanding that there is nothing new under the sun, Ecclesiastes.

 

There is a danger that that poor DCA drones paid to trawl this site might not understand.:-)

 

x

 

v

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you're being pedantic! Indeed RIP are letters, and important ones if you believe and possibly if you don't. Having said that, I've had a lot of fun with DCA's by taking what they say literally when it is obviously not meant to be taken in this way.

 

What I was saying was I prefer my own words to templates. Templates are just that, a template. Letters (proper letters my dear pedant!) can be crafted almost into a work of art, and I've scribed a few where I'd love to be there when they're opened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Could someone take a look at the attached letter and let me know whether we need to reply and what we should reply if so.

 

The letter is from Moorcroft, debt collectors for Santander loan. The original creditor was Cahoot, taken out April 2006. Neither Santander nor Moorcroft want to accept lower payment and sent a notice of intended litigation to collect the total debt, rcvd 19/4/11. In reply we CCA'd them. Letter attached is their response to CCA.

 

Thanks.

moorcroft1.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Cahoot are now part of Santander. Moorcroft would not take the court action. They clearly don't own the loan, so only have an equitable assignment whereby they gain the rights to try to collect the money from you. The only way they could take court action would be in partnership with Santander (now the OC).

 

I would therefore be inclined to ignore any requests for what you'd rely on in court etc.... and either do just that, totally ignore it, or send them a letter saying that as they have not yet supplied the agreement the account is in dispute and so they must, as they have, stop all collection activity on it until the CCA is produced, or a reconstitution of it. I would also go on to say that you consider requesting details of what you would rely on in court if it went that far as an aggressive commercial practice under CPUTR 2008 Part Two Section 7, sub section 2 and against OFT Debt Collection Guidance.

 

If you do respond, finish by saying court procedures will be dealt with within clear timescales laid down by the court and as you disagree with them that their suggested course of action would be helpful, you have nothing further to say on the matter for the time being.

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wilchil :-)

No response required. That's their standard letter when they receive a CCA Request and can't supply the agreement within the required period.

They've stated the account is on hold till they do, which is good.

 

You can safely totally ignore the other guff about identifying legal issues. Just their rather transparent attempt to intimidate you and put the idea of court (argghhh, help, panic, worry, scare.....LOL) into your head, without justification.

Just sit back and wait.

If they or anyone pester again before supplying the CCA just send the account in dispute letter.

 

Take care,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

W

 

Happy Anniversary! A Year today since you started your thread! Things seem to be quiet with you just now - which hopefully is a good sign?

 

Look back and see how far you've come in the last year.

 

Good luck.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BD and all. Things quiet at the mo. We are making token payments to all bar Santander loan (formally Cahoot), we have requested CCA beginning of May (see above) and have heard nothing else, we are not making payments to them at present (is this the right thing to do?). End of contract looming again and things up in the air so fingers crossed!

 

Thanks for your support over the year guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

W

 

Glad things mostly still under control.

 

Re Santander, some advise to keep paying a token amount if account in dispute due to not sending out a CCA. However if they CAN'T find it - and can't enforce the debt at all - then that is just money down the drain.

 

I personally DO NOT PAY A PENNY to those OC's and DCA's who have still not produced enforceable CCA's. Currently I'm only paying out £5 to each of two DCA's - zilch to all others - and not even getting threatening letters any more - phone calls all stopped after the "harassment" letters.

 

One £11k card debt (Morgan Stanley) reached the SB deadline last year - with nothing paid to it for over 6 years. Others are now working towards that same goal as we speak! Perhaps some of the remaining creditors will get heavy again - but no sign of that so far. I think they are all far too busy going after easier targets and so leave us bolshy ones on the back burner - I certainly hope that's the case!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally DO NOT PAY A PENNY to those OC's and DCA's who have still not produced enforceable CCA's.

I would concur with BD on this one.

 

One £11k card debt (Morgan Stanley) reached the SB deadline last year - with nothing paid to it for over 6 years. Others are now working towards that same goal as we speak!

Two years down, four more to go in my case!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...