Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

We have so much debt, it seems only hope is selling house!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 608
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Would be grateful for some further advice. We had a letter on Saturday from Sainsburys Bank, saying one of their reps. will be calling at our home on 7th October, please telephone if not convenient.

 

What do you suggest? If we write, it may not be read by the right people in time to stop them coming. Are they allowed to come to our house? Would it make sense to ring and say it's not convenient and then follow up with a letter, pointing out rules and guidelines etc.?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their rep may be 'phoning' you on that day, rather than making a personal visit.

 

Doorstep callers have NO legal powers and cannot make an inventory of your goods for pre-legal purposes as some DCAs like to claim. You can quite safely send them packing and should the company concerned CHARGE you for the visit a complaint directly to Trading Standards AND the OFT is in order.

 

There is a letter in the templates you can send them telling them you don't want visits, and you can print a copy of the letter for the 'agent' should one appear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I'm not going to "be in" if they call at the house anyway.

 

The actual wording is "Our representative will be calling your home on: 7th October 2010". I didn't even consider it might mean a phone call ...

 

I'll look for the letter in the templates now but am worried it won't reach the correct department in time. My husband is set to call them today to tell them we will only correspond in writing, just wanted to check here that we don't say the wrong thing!

 

---

 

I've searched for the template but can't find it. Any suggestions what to include in a letter to them?

 

Thanks.

Edited by wilchil64
Added re template
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question: Are we more likely to get somewhere with lower payments if we go through CCCS or national Debtline etc. I feel we're not getting anywhere with offering lower payments as only 2 have accepted and am struggling with the stress of all the letters, arriving almost daily - I should be concentrating on my family but spend most of my time writing to these stupid companies. I can't keep writing to them daily, getting nowhere - and I'm not convinced they'll ever accept F&Fs either, as they are generally not being helpful at all, don't seem to read our letters or respond to them, just keep repeating that they want our I&E details or they can't help us and can we ring them? I don't want to go to court and don't want them knocking on my door. I just want some peace of mind and to get on with my life. I know we got ourselves in this mess and we are trying to sort it but they don't seem interested at all.

 

On top of everything my husband's pay has decreased a bit and I have less work each month also. In the meantime, everything just gets more and more expensive.

 

What will happen - worst case scenario - if we only write to them once a month, replying to all their letters in one letter from us and enclosing a monthly payment as calculated by us to be what we can afford.

Link to post
Share on other sites

W

 

I thought you had contacted CCCS already? If not, then do so and let them work out your I&E and then tell each creditor your paymentb of £xx is based on CCCS advice. It should carry a bit more clout than just your own workings - but make sure you hold back money for unexpected repairs and annual cost slike house and car insurance, road tax etc. as well as regular monthly costs.

 

Up to you re the doorstep visit - but as said above there is a "no doorstep visits" template you can send if you donb't want it.

 

I know these things are stressful - but eventually they usually accept low monthly payments and offer F&F's - but you need to persevere to get these down to a level you're happy with.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I wasn't very clear, was I? I did contact CCCS in June and completed a budget sheet online with them to work out how much to pay each creditor. What I meant above was is it likely that my creditors will accept a DMP coming directly from CCCS, rather than from me? i.e. if I let CCCS handle it and just pay a monthly sum to CCCS so that they send the payments and letters to the creditors?

 

I'll get the doorstep visit template sent off to them.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

W

 

Yes - it's worth a try to get CCCS to get a DMP set up - provided they don't charge anything for this service- provided the agreement can be changed if you find you need to hold back more in future if you need to do so - and provided you ENSURE you ONLY allow them to pay what you CAN afford. Remember you ARE allowed some LUXURIES - and UNEXPECTED bills do arise for car and house repairs etc.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another quick question: If a credit card was taken out 6 years ago but you keep using it, is the debt 6 years old or only if you haven't used it for 6 years?

 

Thanks.

 

Hadn't noticed this question before - sorry. I believe the 6 years Limitation (after which debt is SB) is to do with when you last made any PAYMENT - or acknowledged the debt in writing - not when you first took on the debt - but not sure about how any subsequent usage of the card after stopping payments (if they actually allowed this) affects when the 6 year clock starts to tick.

 

Anyone else know?

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a quick question:

 

What is the difference between a Default Notice and a "Notice of default sum"?

 

I take the latter to mean they are just informing us that we didn't make the minimum payment last month, is that correct

 

In that case, I can just ignore them, can't I? I will of course still send the lower pro rate payments each month.

 

We've just replied to a couple of letters from creditors, pointing out that we don't want to call them as we need any agreements in writing. Nothing exciting apart from a Notice of default sum from Sainsos.

 

Thanks for your help. Have a good weekend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Heckmondwike. We'll keep fighting.

 

Got a load of letters to plough through tonight from this week, started with a letter to M&S last night, more tonight! What a way to spend a weekend!

 

W

 

Try to play them at their own game - with as near a standard computer generated letter as you can sent to each creditor - with minimum editing only as required. Once you have them taking the payment and not complaining the same letter can be sent to them all - or none at all if you pay them by BACS (as you should whereever possible)

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BD. I copied and pasted the main bits about not talking on the phone, deem them to have accepted proposals by cashing cheques etc. I've now set up a more or less standard letter with the important bits in it so I can delete the bits not needed and reply to their letters with the minimum fuss.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got a pile of letters from this week to wade through tomorrow evening but this one arived today and I thought I'd better scan it in to see how you advise replying to it.

 

This is from Sainsos "the grocer".

 

To recap, we have been offering a payment of approx. a quarter of the original contractual payment since July, they have been cashing cheques and not accepting our proposals, and they are the ones who said they would call our home, which we took to mean a doorstep visit (they didn't come). Our last letter to them, which they are replying to here, said

 

- we'll only communicate in writing

- won't accept doorstep visit and that we are aware of the law and will call the police if they do.

 

Letter prior to that said

 

- we don't understand why they say we aren't contacting them, listing the dates of our letters and cheques, all of which they have cashed.

- we won't discuss by phone

- cannot afford payments previusly made but will continue to make payment of £xx (lower amount). They are only to bank if accepting my proposals to suspend charges and interest.

- won't send more cheques unless they confirm they will not issue DN.

- that they are contravening OFT guidelines re. how they treat those in financial difficulties

- a paragraph saying if they bank the cheque they are deemed to accept our terms and the amount will be deemed to be the new contractual monthly payment (as BD advised above).

 

My thoughts are:

 

I am loathe to stop payments to them as then surely the court won't be happy with us anymore if we do get taken to court? Isn't it better to keep paying the lower amounts? If this is the case, should we ignore their letter and carry on with nice letters with a cheque once a month, or better to reply.

 

How ridiculous! They say they are a telephone based collections centre and can't correspond in writing!!! Idiots!

 

Also, I'm happy to put something in our letter again, saying, thanks for advising we contact Payplan or CCCS, I'm sure you'll be happy to know we have contacted CCCS and are acting on their advice by sending you this payment, etc etc.

 

Would be grateful for advice.

 

Thanks everyone.

sainsburys rcvd b 141010.PDF

sainsburys rcvd 141010.PDF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...