Jump to content


Bryan Carter Solicitors re: Lowell Financial Limited


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4739 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Just got a reply from red DEBT collection services today dated 08 Nov 2010 after sending my statute barred letter.

 

 

Thank you for your letter, concerning the above account.

 

Your account is not legally unenforceable under the Limitation Act 1980 on the basis that a

default notice was served on you by Capital One on 8th Oct 2007.

 

Section 5 of the Act mentioned says that following the date when a cause of action arose

for payment of the debt, any creditor such as Lowell Portfolio I Ltd has a period of six years

to enforce such a right to payment.

 

The date of the default notice is when the debt in this matter became due for payment in full

and the period from which Lowell Portfolio I Ltd has to enforce their right to payment in the

absence any payments or written acknowledgements being made by you in between this date.

 

We trust this clarifies the situation and look forward to receiving your payment proposals.

 

Yours sincerely.

 

Does anyone have any advice on this please.

 

Many Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are implying you made a payment or acknowledgement some time in 2007. Any chance?

 

Thought not...

 

The date when a default or DN was issued is irrelevant. This is NOT a cause of action – the wording of the act is clear. If it mattered, no creditor would ever issue a DN – it would keep a debt alive forever, and no SB! What matters is when YOU last acknowledged the debt – not when they did.

 

This needs a complaint of the nastiest order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they have contravened the OFT’s guidance on debt collecting – they are in breach of 2.4(b):

 

False representation of authority and/or legal position

2.3 Those contacting debtors must not be deceitful by misrepresenting their authority and/or the correct legal position.

2.4 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

b. falsely implying or stating that action can or will be taken when it legally cannot, for example, referring to bankruptcy or sequestration proceedings when the balance is too low to qualify for such proceedings or claiming a right of entry when no court order to this effect has been granted

 

Write back and tell them as much – and that the issuing of a default does not count as acknowledgment of debt. Demand their complaints procedure, and tell them you will be reporting them to the OFT and TS immediately (and do it!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Great News!!! :-D

 

Thanks to everyone's help especially DonkeyB, I now have closure on the account.

 

Lowell wrote:

 

Your account is now closed.

We have today reviewed your overdue account.

 

We have discovered that section (5) of the limitation Act 1980 now applies to your account (this relates to the amount of time passing between now and the time you incurred the debt) and we will no longer be asking you for payment.

 

We will not send you anymore letters and we have now closed your account with Lowell.

 

Yours sincerely.

 

Thanks again DonkeyB and everyone else.

 

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

"We have discovered..."

 

No, they were told. They can't blame Red for the deliberately misleading response, as Red IS Lowell.

 

Send copies of all the correspondence to the OFT. If they are trashing your credit rating, get onto that too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...