Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st Plus PPI Refund Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In need of some advice on this.

 

I had a successful PPI reclaim from 1st Plus a couple of years ago, without the need of the FOS. I thought everything had gone fine and received the rebate. This was made up of:

 

1) Full refund of original ppi premium credited to loan account.

2) Interest paid on ppi part of monthly repayment refunded and credited to loan account.

3) Overpayments of monthly premiums already paid refunded to me by cheque.

 

All good so far, however, I have recently received information from 1st Plus after sending them a SAR request. Along with a mountain of paperwork, they have sent me statements of the balance of the account at the time the ppi was refunded.

 

According to these statements, the original refund was credited to the account, as was the refund of interest. However, the amount that was refunded to me by cheque was added back onto the account. This was approx £3,200.

 

What I want to know is is this correct? Does this figure have to be put back onto the loan? In their letters at the time, they state that I was put back into the position of not taking out the ppi, but how can this be the case when they have given me something with one hand and taken it back with the other?

 

After over 4 and a half years repaying this loan which was for £57,000, and with monthly repayments of at least £570 per month (with ppi removed from monthly repayment) the balance is still at £54,000!!! If the £3,200 hadn't been added back onto the account, the balance would be £50,800.

 

I've only questioned this now because they refuse to lower their interest rate on the loan which is currently at 12% and I'm looking at the possibility of the whole loan being missold.

 

Any advice on this would be really appreciated.

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping this up guys!

 

Basically what I need to know is can 1st Plus issue me with a refund cheque for overpayments with one hand, and then add this amount back onto the balance of the loan account with the other?

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In need of some advice on this.

 

I had a successful PPI reclaim from 1st Plus a couple of years ago, without the need of the FOS. I thought everything had gone fine and received the rebate. This was made up of:

 

1) Full refund of original ppi premium credited to loan account.

2) Interest paid on ppi part of monthly repayment refunded and credited to loan account.

3) Overpayments of monthly premiums already paid refunded to me by cheque.

 

All good so far, however, I have recently received information from 1st Plus after sending them a SAR request. Along with a mountain of paperwork, they have sent me statements of the balance of the account at the time the ppi was refunded.

 

According to these statements, the original refund was credited to the account, as was the refund of interest. However, the amount that was refunded to me by cheque was added back onto the account. This was approx £3,200.

 

What I want to know is is this correct? Does this figure have to be put back onto the loan? In their letters at the time, they state that I was put back into the position of not taking out the ppi, but how can this be the case when they have given me something with one hand and taken it back with the other?

 

After over 4 and a half years repaying this loan which was for £57,000, and with monthly repayments of at least £570 per month (with ppi removed from monthly repayment) the balance is still at £54,000!!! If the £3,200 hadn't been added back onto the account, the balance would be £50,800.

 

I've only questioned this now because they refuse to lower their interest rate on the loan which is currently at 12% and I'm looking at the possibility of the whole loan being missold.

 

Any advice on this would be really appreciated.

 

MP.

 

If you reclaim mis-sold PPI and you are successful any rebate of PPI can as I understand it be used to offset any outstanding debt on the account. I would be inclined to check again on the PPi repayments on your loan to ensure everything is above board.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the point. They haven't offset it against the debt. They have added it onto the debt!

 

Quick example:

 

Account balance before ppi reclaim = £67,000

 

Original ppi amount @ £11,500 reclaimed and credited to account. Account balance now = £56,500

 

Interest charged on mis-sold ppi @ £2,800 credited to account. Account balance now = £53,700

 

Monthly repayments restructured and ppi element removed. Previous ppi overpayments already made @ £3,200 refunded to me by personal cheque.

 

Same £3,200 charged back onto loan account. Account balance now = £56,900

 

This was 2 years ago and only came to light through recent SAR request.

 

Original loan for £57,000 taken out over 4 and a half years ago. Balance now = £54,000 with over £25,000 already paid back in monthly instalments!:-x

 

1st Plus claim nothing wrong and all above board!:confused::confused:

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Update on this:

 

This matter is now being investigated by the FOS - has been for months now.

 

Current balance of loan now stands at £52,500, meaning that if FP figures are correct, we have only repaid £4,500 in over 6 years of repayments - with each monthly payment being at least £570!!!

 

Work out what we have paid them in return!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received letter confirming case finally passed to Ombudsman team for final decision, but depending on the complexities of the case, could take up to a year to reach a decision.

 

Have been reading up on the rule or 78 regarding interest and settlement figures. If our loan was for an initial £57,000 and we now still owe £52,500 after nearly 6 and a half years worth of payments, is it plausible that FP have used the 78 rule to calculate the settlement figure.

 

MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...