Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Amex as with any creditor must help you the FOS should go with you and make them remove all interest charged from the very 1st time of asking for help. the FCA regulations actually almost dictate it, they most certainly clearly state that if the are FCA registered they must help.   it's very telling they have no marked your credit file....almost as if they know they are wrong. it's also telling that an irresponsible lending complaint might well be in order hear too, they can just keep upping the credit limit without checking you can pay. and ofcourse covid plays its part here and they've already admitted as they allowed payments holidays until october in line with the rest of the industry and they should be continuing that. you problem is you keep using the phone, no paperwork no record of things discussed. i'd get an SAR off to them. and get the comms/account log and all the statements from day one and go nail them.
    • Hello CAG, Bit of a long post, may want to get a cuppa before starting reading... 😁   after being a lurker for many years and trying never to get into a mess with credit cards like i did 20 years ago, i've got myself into a mess with Amex... I've tried being open and honest with them, but now getting the feeling they are messing me around.    Its not a chargecard, but a Nectar Credit Card with them. TAKEN out 2016. Balance is just under £15k as of today, was almost at £17k.  Debt still owed by Amex, not been sent to NCO/Arrow etc - YET...    Background (short version): Was all fine with more than min. payment (£500 or so), being made until April 2020 when a number of things reduced my monthly salary from work (mainly, take a pay cut or be made redundant), so I soon quickly realised i needed to tighten my belt quickly. Phoned Amex, advisor said nothing they could do except Payment Holiday. Was put onto that for 3 months, told that Amex will be in touch at the end to restart payments. I asked about interest being stopped/frozen/reduced - not possible. So agreed to payment holiday to give me breathing space. 3 months came and went, no contact from Amex... No payments made, interest still racking up at around £300 a month...    Rang Amex back (July 2020), we cant do anything today because your in the middle of the statement cycle call back next week. Called back week after, no solution yet (i asked about things i seen on Amex US website = Regain program - basically freeze card, lower interest rate and pay a set amount for 12 months - more about this later) > Not available in UK yet.   Want to stay on payment holiday Mister B? I asked if there was any way interest could be stopped as this is making the balance increase and increase. No. Do you want to stay on Payment Holiday? Ok. (Bear in mind, if i came off Payment holiday. Minimum Payment was around £570 per month.  So, stayed on payment holiday... Didnt hear anything from Amex again. Called back up in September 2020. Please call back in October after 10th and we can assist.   Called back after October 10, went through loads of stuff, different options etc, was warned that Payment Holiday might not be extended much longer, but now have a program. Worked out with Amex woman that i could pay around £200 per month. But please stop interest - no we cant but we can reduce this down to 9.9APR instead of 23%... . Amex woman said she needed to submit details to 'Seniors' at Amex, please call back next week for update.   Called back week after, advised that first Amex woman was wrong and had made mistakes, shouldn't have told me what she had told me, £200 is too low, minimum would be £389 per month for 12 months or account will default. Told Amex woman 2 that couldn't afford it, went through this last time, etc etc. Amex woman 2 went off, came back, £329.74 is minimum they can possibly accept, 12 months at that amount per month and interest would be lowered, but not stopped. If you dont take out this 'Program' then account will default and will be passed to NCO or Arrow (I hate them both).  Went off, tried to get loans etc, all refused. Rang Amex back, reluctantly agreed so i can keep credit rating at 'good'.  So, been paying since Nov 2021 @ £329.74.    Letter arrived in December - due to out mess up with moving accounts around whilst on payment holiday, we are going to give you £3074 back. Logged into account, only £30.74 refunded, not £3074. Phoned Amex cos thought it was a joke/mistake - Spoke to some bloke - Oh dont worry, the rest will be applied to account automatically in 7 days. he advised was genuine but then got cut off during call. Called back, spoke to some other bloke, yes, looks genuine but please hold... Came back 10 minutes later. Oh, its a mis-print, you are not the only customer to receive one of these. Each should have been £30.74 not £3074. Me = Gutted.    Wrote a letter to Amex saying how dissatisfied i was with general customer service and felt they were incompetent, blah blah etc. Final response received, Complaint partially upheld, heres £150 credit because we were a bit silly, but thats it. IF your still not happy, go to FOS. Opened a case with FOS... Have sent them the complaint letter to them and have had a call from them about this... FOS are backlogged though and will take another 3 months for complaint to be looked at by them.   Let me make this 100% clear, fully admit to owning the debt, yep, ive spent this money (wish I knew what on, cos having got much to show from it - just general stuff and holidays)... Not trying to shirk out of it, trying my best to keep up with re-payments but im really struggling. After I got paid on 1st April, after paying all outgoings i had £9.83 left in current account so am having to go into overdraft each month which is just a vicious circle.  I would really like to NOT have to down the default route and trash my credit rating and then have to deal with the morons at NCO / Arrow etc.    Meanwhile, this is where I need the advice of the CAG experts... - Credit Limit increases... These were coming every few months and it was just being upped and upped and upped. Credit limit eventually was stopped at £15,400. Some of the increases I never even received letter for, just noticed when I logged into account. >>>> Would this be a case for irresponsible lending?   - Stopping interest - I've read something on FCA site that they recommend (not policy) that if a customer is put onto a payment holiday then they recommend freezing interest for customer so the debt doesn't continue to build. I've asked time and time again, Amex just refuse.  >>>> Any tips on how to get Amex to play ball?    - Full & Final/Short settlement I've rung Amex today, told them I might be able to pay it off. Initially they said full balance, i then pushed, they then said they would accept 80% of balance, pushed them a bit more, got it down to 70%. >>> Surprised, and then very surprised they would accept 70%, anyone else think this is a bit odd? Normally they wont budge, or they wont budge from their first offer... Could their be something wrong on account (missing CCA etc?), or do they want rid of me and account as much as I do with them?   - Cant really keep going at these £329.74 repayments. Something is going to have to give somewhere. I believe they wont go any lower and they will just default it i send £100 instead of £329 and send it out to NCO/Arrow. This might not be a too bad thing though because this would stop the interest right? Anyone thoughts on this?    Anyone think of anything else I could try with them? Again, its still with Amex, not defaulted or anything yet, yep, its all my own fault, i've spent the money, dont deny that, just feel Amex have took advantage etc.   Many thanks for reading. Any advice is greatly appreciated.   Kr, Mista B.     
    • Ok so we have complained to HMRC but were still no further forward with getting the P45/P60. We need this as DVLA has said they need more proof of who he is before giving him a provisional license.  What more can l do. 
    • Hi All   just looking for some advice. I bought a used Porsche Boxster from one of Marshall motor group’s Audi dealers (can I name them?) recently and was assured that it received a major service in October 2020 in line with the manufacturers requirements. The service book confirms this. The dealer also told me on the phone that they have a 6 month rule with any mot or service being done if due within this period which assured me when making an offer over the phone on the car that it wouldn’t need anything doing for a while as I recall saying that.   However, digging through the receipts post delivery I saw that the service was in fact minor and after calling the specialist who serviced it in Oct both they (Sheepishly) and the invoice confirmed that the car did not receive new spark plugs, an air filter, brake fluid replacement or a new fan belt which have now all fallen due and hence the major service due warning light. Had I not investigated this then the car would have potentially gone another 4 years, so 8 in total without some of these items being done.   i emailed the salesman to ask what they would propose to do. The matter is complicated by my living 450 miles away in Scotland, and 200 from their nearest branch, a Mercedes dealer in the Lake District, so I suggested getting my cheapest local specialist to do the works that have fallen due, however I have received no response.   Whilst I am still within my 30 days i don’t want to reject the car, which is otherwise perfect, but the fact remains that the Audi 150 point check only asks for upcoming mot’s to be checked and not services and surely you wouldn’t buy an approved used car and expect to have the service light come on 2 weeks later and have to spend almost £500 putting it right.   i would really appreciate some advice on next steps and perhaps who to escalate this to. Meantime the car is booked in for 2 weeks time to get the work done at the cheapest reputable place I could find.   Many, many thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Dodgy Hypnos Mattress - Help Required Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3677 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine bought an ex-display Hypnos mattress from furniture company Levines last year in October. By the beginning of this year both my friend and her husband were suffering with their backs. The springs in the mattress were simply not doing their job and supporting their backs, in fact when lying on it, their backs are very low and their legs almost raised in comparison. Both are on the lighter side of the weight scale so it's not a size issue! They went back to the retailer in April / May this year and were told someone would come out to assess the mattress.

 

A representative did come out and was very surprised, as Hypnos mattresses are normally very good and are very rarely faulty. However this particular mattress was definitely faulty and he said as much. He also said that he would have to go back to the store and write a report and new mattress would be arranged and that they would be contacted within two days to arrange this.

 

Two days came and went and no contact was issued, and over the course of weeks my friends went back to the store several times to chase this up. On the third visit they were told that there was no such report. The manager of the store did call up the representative who had assessed the mattress. The rep (whose name my friends don't have unfortunately) was very vague and said initially that he couldn't recall coming out to their house, he then turned around and said that he didn't feel that their mattress had been faulty.

 

The store manager suggested another rep come out to assess the mattress, this one came over on July 28th and said that the mattress was fine. He said he needed the serial number off the mattress so just ripped the label off it to take with him!

 

The mattress was bought in October 2005 and my friend has had two extended periods of time off work, once in October 2005 and once in February 2006, these were due to back, shoulder and neck ache. She is now in pain on a daily basis. However when she spends the night elsewhere on a different bed her back is fine the next day. Her husband has also started to suffer with back pain and both of them have had to go to the doctors due to the severity of the pain.

 

Can anyone please advise what they should do next? They feel as though they have no recourse as they've been to the store and they have denied any problems.

 

Is it possible for them to involve trading standards and if so how do they go about doing it, or would a strongly worded letter to the retailer threatening legal action do the trick?

 

Please, please, can someone help, my friends are on a low income and can't just afford to throw away the mattress and buy a new one, and instead their health is now starting to suffer.

 

Thanks

Angie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very sorry to hear about your friends condition, wish her a quick recovery of her back problem from me!

 

First things first, Under the Sale Of Goods Act Ammended, all goods bought from someone selling in the course of a business must meet the following three points:

 

1) The Goods Must Be Of Satisfactory Quality:- This means the goods must last a reasonable amount of time and not be faulty, the court would take into account the price paid when coming to a decision on whether the item is of satisfactory quality.

2) The Goods Must Be Fit For The Purpose In Which They Were Bought:- This means that a kettle must boil water, and that a phone charger should be able to charge phones etc. So this mattress must be suitable for sleeping on, which if it causes back problems, it obviously isnt.

3) The Goods Must Be As Described:- This means that any description that was given to the matress in the shop must be true, this includes anthing the sales assistent said, e.g, if she shop worker said its a double bedded matress, it must be just that, not a single.

 

Write a letter to the shops head office, stating the fact you believe the goods do not comply with the Sale Of Goods Act Ammended, because they arent of Satisfactory Quality because...........

 

State what you want, e.g, an exchange, a repair etc. But you ARE NOT entitled to a refund because you have accepted the goods, but if they cant exchange or repair it, you may just be entitled to a refund.

 

I'll quickly draft a template letter below:

 

Company Name,

Head Office Address,

Town,

County,

Post Code.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Iam writing to you in relation to an on going problem I am having with a faulty product I purchased from you.

On (date purchased) xx/xx/xxxx, I bought a xxxxxxxxxx from your branch in xxxxxx, since the purchase date I have realised that the product is inherently faulty.

The Sale Of Goods Act Ammended states that all goods must be of Satisfactory Quality, due to the fault in which I will outline below, I do not believe that the item complies with the above legislation.

The item has caused back problems to me ever since I purchased it, and I have evidence to prove the back problems resulted from your faulty product below: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (outline the reasons that you believe prove the back problems are from the fault matress)

I request that my goods are promptly exchanged or repaired so that I do not suffer any further inconvience.

Should you fail to furnish me with a positive reply within 14 days, I regret to inform you I shall be seeking to commence civil proceeding for Breach Of Implied Contract Terms.

I hope that such action will not be required.

I have included my name, address, telephone number and proof of purchase with this letter.

I await your prompt reply.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

xxxxxxxxx

 

Other users feel free to make positive contributions to the above template but i think that about sums it up.

 

If they dont respond to the above letter positivley within 14 days, come back and we'll sort you out with a "Letter Before Action".

 

Hope Ive Helped,

 

Regards, Tom3131.

Before you take any legal action, please read through the

FAQ's, then if you dont understand something, please ask for advice ;) .

 

If theres a thread in which you think I could help, please PM me using the Private Messaging facility in the top right hand corner of the screen.

 

Advice & opinions of tom3131, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to my friend and it would appear she has no proof of purchase...... She paid cash for the bed all in about £700 and can't locate the receipt. This will probably complicate it a bit won't it.

 

I imagine the fact that Levines have sent two reps out to look at it indicates they recognise the purchase. I suppose she'll have to somehow get them to send her a copy of the purchase invoice without alerting them as to why she needs it.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

good idea, althoughif you and your friends could all sign a form validating the date of purchase then i doubt they'll start challenging it.....great idea about getting the invoice though;)

 

tom.

Before you take any legal action, please read through the

FAQ's, then if you dont understand something, please ask for advice ;) .

 

If theres a thread in which you think I could help, please PM me using the Private Messaging facility in the top right hand corner of the screen.

 

Advice & opinions of tom3131, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you ha

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

Hi All

 

This has been going on for ages but my friend finally got a response from the retailer last week. She sent them the suggested letter above posted by Tom. Their only response was to say that they had already assesed it twice and that they were unwilling to do anything further. If my friend wanted to take it further she would have to get an independant body to look at the mattress to assess it.

 

Would anyone out there know how to contact someone to go about doing this? Would the retailer then have to pay for this if the mattress was found to be faulty?

 

I appreciate all your help.

 

Thanks

Angie

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've done fine so far with the letter as suggested. The proof of purchase issue could make things a bit trickier, although as you say they have clearly acknowledged it as their product. Did your friends get a copy of the invoice in the end?

 

Re. an independent report - you could try Qualitas who are a trade association for the furnishings industry.

 

Qualitas

 

Levines are not members unfortunately, so it will cost you more, but you could add this to your claim in the event it goes to the small claims court. Hopefully the judge would see that the report was necessary and if you are successful award this amount as costs.

 

(I say "you", I mean your friends, but I guess you know that!)

Please note I'm not insured in this capacity, so if you need to, do get official legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Rosie, I did try to get the invoice on their behalf but the details I gave Levines came up with wardrobes having been purchased and not the bed! Didn't want to push the issue in case they became suspicious.

 

I've looked at the site you've mentioned and it is definitely useful. However the fee of £250 they charge for their inspection will be too much for my friend to afford.

 

They may just have to cut their losses and buy a new one.

 

But once again thanks for your help, it's appreciated.

 

Angie

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 years later...

I know this is a very old thread, but this may help anyone else in a similar situation.

 

I actually spoke to someone the other day from 'The Sleep Council', when they contacted me about a new web site that I have just launched. I told them that I was very concerned about the growing trend for so called independent inspectors to always find in favour of the retailer. And as the sleep council are part of 'The National Bed Federation' then they said that they would look into it with their members.

 

Anyway the furniture industry ombudsman is FIRA:

 

FIRA International Ltd

Maxwell Road

Stevenage

Hertfordshire

SG1 2EW

UK t: +44 (0)1438 777700

f: +44 (0)1438 777800

Link to post
Share on other sites
qualitas is the same outfit as the furniture ombudsman. all part of fira, a trade association.

 

I'm in the trade but I've never heard of them being called that before. But you are right, thanks for sharing that.

 

FIRA aren't so much a trade association. They are the Furniture Industry Research Association. In other words they are the people who do all those destructive tests on furniture that Ikea try to convince us in their adverts that they are the only people to carry them out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are just like satra, but perhaps not as big. It's a membership club. You pay to join, they do their thing. They lobby for the industry, provide info and stuff. I think trade association as a label fits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
They are just like satra, but perhaps not as big. It's a membership club. You pay to join, they do their thing. They lobby for the industry, provide info and stuff. I think trade association as a label fits.

 

They specialise in the furniture industry, but are a research organisation. Don't confuse them with the NFB, which is a membership club for the industry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure I agree. it seems like spin to me.

 

http://www.fira.co.uk/membership

 

Then there is this:

 

http://welcome.fira.co.uk/service-technicians

 

'9 out of ten products kept in the home'? 'fewer returns'?Seem ropey to me. Certainly on the side of business it would seem. It also seems a bit odd that they offer this service. But its ok, because if you complain, then you can send a complaint to the furniture ombudsman, which is also part of the same club.

 

They might be genuine, but the evidence suggests it is a club and by every definition you can look at, they are a trade association.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure I agree. it seems like spin to me.

 

 

Then there is this:

 

 

'9 out of ten products kept in the home'? 'fewer returns'?Seem ropey to me. Certainly on the side of business it would seem. It also seems a bit odd that they offer this service. But its ok, because if you complain, then you can send a complaint to the furniture ombudsman, which is also part of the same club.

 

They might be genuine, but the evidence suggests it is a club and by every definition you can look at, they are a trade association.

 

You really need to get your facts right before you start arguing about something.

 

FIRA is not a trade association, it is as the name states the Furniture Industry Research Association. They do research and development for the furniture industry, they do fire, safety and endurance tests on furniture (as they do for Which Magazine), they provide consultancy services, and they provide an inspection service. And as they are independent they also provide an ombudsman service for the furniture industry. FIRA are a business who provide services to the furniture industry, they are are not a trade association.

 

NBF or National Bed Federation however are a trade association who are funded by a percentage of the turnover of it's members. The NBF will promote the bed industry, and even give out what is supposed to be independent advice (Ha Ha), through The Sleep Council, who are part of NBF. The trouble is that the NBF and the sleep council will never say anything against their members, their products, their gimmicks, or their sales tactics, because they are funded by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to get your facts straight. FIRA is a ltd company, that is funded by memberships. The Furniture Industry Research Association as it was (and as was established by the govt years ago) was sold out to private individuals years and years ago. They do outsourced customer services, and carry out paid for projects for industry. They lobby for the industry. They do do testing, but I'd wager it isn't a huge part of what they do these days as a percentage of turnover. They are part of a larger group of companies that sell consultancy services. None of this persuades me that they are actually independent, far from it. If they are reliant on businesses paying them for call centre services and 'consultancy' projects then they are hardly likely to side with me against someone that is paying them thousands of pounds, are they? I also think it is odd that an 'ombudsman' service would appear to be part of a profit making ltd company.

 

The trouble is that 'an organisation' will never say anything against their members, their products, their gimmicks, or their sales tactics, because they are funded by them. Sounds worrying. Sounds like a description of FIRA. A google doesn't show me any cases where they are sticking up for the little man against the likes of B&Q or Moben.

 

I ask you - Moben? Really? Just looking at the list of their members seems to paint quite a clear picture...

 

As for the name - anyone can call a company anything it wants. It doesn't mean anything. They'd love you to think that they are not a trade association, but really, looking at what they actually do, they are either a straight profit making company, or a trade association. Either way, as I posted above, it all seems odd to me and clearly on the side of business, not us customers.

 

If you feel they are not a trade association, could you define what you think a trade is and does?

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you need to get your facts straight. FIRA is a ltd company, that is funded by memberships. The Furniture Industry Research Association as it was (and as was established by the govt years ago) was sold out to private individuals years and years ago. They do outsourced customer services, and carry out paid for projects for industry.

 

Most of that is what I just said

 

 

They lobby for the industry.

 

Any company in the furniture industry would lobby for the industry

 

They do do testing, but I'd wager it isn't a huge part of what they do these days as a percentage of turnover.

 

Maybe you should visit their site in Stevenage if that's what you think.

 

 

They are part of a larger group of companies that sell consultancy services. None of this persuades me that they are actually independent, far from it. If they are reliant on businesses paying them for call centre services and 'consultancy' projects then they are hardly likely to side with me against someone that is paying them thousands of pounds, are they? I also think it is odd that an 'ombudsman' service would appear to be part of a profit making ltd company.

 

Are you arguing against yourself now??? Because I'm really not sure what point you are trying to make, except for maybe just having an argument.

 

I've already said that FIRA is a business who's line of business is to provide services for the furniture industry. Just like 1000's of other companies provide various services to various business sectors. That doesn't make them a trade association, it makes them a business.

 

As for the name - anyone can call a company anything it wants. It doesn't mean anything. They'd love you to think that they are not a trade association, but really, looking at what they actually do, they are either a straight profit making company, or a trade association. Either way, as I posted above, it all seems odd to me and clearly on the side of business, not us customers.

 

As I said from the start, they are a company that makes a profit, not a trade association.

 

 

If you feel they are not a trade association, could you define what you think a trade is and does?

 

A trade is a line of business.

A trade association is a group of members in the same trade who work together as a group.

 

 

Maybe you should try and tell my friend who lives a few doors away from me, and who works for FIRA, that he doesn't know who he works for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The Furniture Industry Research Association was established over 60 years ago by the furniture industry for the industry. "

 

"Furniture testing remains a core part of FIRA's business" which implies it isn't the main bit of their business.

 

'The Furniture Industry Research Association is a truly unique, not for profit organisation that represents the whole of the UK furniture industry.'

 

Seems very trade association-y to me.

 

What would visiting the company tell me that the accounts won't? I'd wager if I went there I'd see lots of space given over to testing equipment and maybe a third or half given over to offices, or call centre type stuff. It wouldn't show me where they get most of their money from, just what they use their space for. I could turn my living room into a server farm, it won't make me an IT geek.

 

Most trade associations I know of are ltd companies that sell membership packages for a set of benefits or advice. Seems to fit FIRA.

 

As for the argument - you appear to be saying that they are not a trade association. I think that they appear to be a trade association.

Yo have stated that they 'are a research organisation' I don't think that this is the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"tim deegan"?

 

Why do I need to work in/for either of the above to pass an opinion on what something looks like? I freely admit that it is my opinion, I've not suggested otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites
"tim deegan"?

 

Why do I need to work in/for either of the above to pass an opinion on what something looks like? I freely admit that it is my opinion, I've not suggested otherwise.

 

So why would you argue so stongly about something that is just your opinion???

Link to post
Share on other sites

because you misrepresenting what the organisation is, are not providing substance to back up your opinion, are representing your opinion as incontrovertible fact, and are from the furniture industry so appear to be bias.

Link to post
Share on other sites
because you misrepresenting what the organisation is, are not providing substance to back up your opinion, are representing your opinion as incontrovertible fact, and are from the furniture industry so appear to be bias.

 

I have no connections with FIRA (apart from the fact that I have a friend who works there). And I have no bias towards them in any way. In fact when The Sleep Council called me the other day, wating to work together on my new mattress advice web site www.mattressadvice.co.uk , I actually complained to them about the way FIRA run their inspection service. The reason I complained to The Sleep Council is because they are part of NBF, who will obviously work quite closely with FIRA.

 

The Reason I was complaining about the FIRA inspection service is because there have been a huge number of reports of so called independent inspectors finding in favor of the big retailers who paid for their services. And this has happened when it is quite clear that a mattress is faulty. Now you would expect a few dodgy inspection companies to do this, but I have heard of a growing number of cases where FIRA inspectors have done the same. This is in my opinion very poor when you consider that they run the furniture industry ombudsman service.

 

So as you can see I have no bias towards them, but as I am in the industry I do know what they are all about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair comment, and such comments seem to support the statements made on the website - that they exist to support and promote the industry, not consumers. I suspect that it is not that fira pay for the services of the inspectors, but that fira is dependent on business from the same businesses that are being inspected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pls keep it respectful to other members guys, this is a flame free zone :-)

 

Unapproved a previous post

 

S.

Are You as Anonymous on CAG as You Think You Are? *Link*

 

The CAG is a free help site,should you be offered help that requires payment,please report it to site team.

 

Deal with your debts:

STEP ONE - Dont Panic! | STEP TWO - Priority & Non Priority Debts | STEP THREE - Personal Budget Sheet | STEP FOUR - A SAFE bank Account | STEP FIVE - Dealing with Priority Debts | STEP SIX - Non-priority Debts | STEP SEVEN - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt1 | STEP EIGHT - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt2 | STEP NINE - Perils of Consolidation | STEP TEN - RE-Evaluate Frequently

 

***** SERIOUSLY IN DEBT, DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, TRY NationalDebtLine's MoneySteps *****

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinion, These opinions are not endorsed by CAG in anyway and are offered informally without prejudice or warranty of any kind. These opinions are solely based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...