Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I am new to the forum and I am looking for advice as to my next step should be. I have various mental health issues that meant I was told by an advisor at the jobcentre that I needed to go onto ESA, this was back in either Nov or Dec last year, in feb I had a letter from ATOS telling me to go for a medical assesment and after reading the various horror stories of the assesments I wrote to both ATOS and the DWP asking for information such as the name and medical qualifications of the person who decided that a face to face medical assesment needed to be carried out and also the name and medical qualifications of the HCP carrying out the assesment so that I could check they are suitably qualified to asses my medical conditions with the BMA, I stated that once I had recieved the required information I would consider making an appointment. I had a phone call from ATOS on the day of my assesment and explained that I had written to themselves and the DWP and would not be attending, I was informed I would recieve a did not attend letter I would have to fill in and send back, which I did and once again went over the same issues raised in the first letter.

I heard nothing more until I got another letter from ATOS yesterday asking me to contact them to make an appointment, it seems to me they are totally ignoring my request for some basic information, it seems to me that they are or could be in breach of the freedom of information act and a possible violation of my human rights.

So should I just write to them again demanding the information or seek possible legal advice ??????

Many thanks for taking time out to read this and any advice gladly recieved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there and welcome to CAG.

 

I haven't come across anyone doing this before. I hope you manage to unravel this, but I fear Atos and the DWP are a law unto themselves and they have the whip hand financially of course.

 

Most people on the forum have resigned themselves to attending the assessment, getting no points or well under the 15 they need, having their appeal to the DWP declined and then going to a tribunal, where one would expect them to win. This is what happened to me.

 

I defer to our experts, but would recommend you go carefully. We'll help as much as we can.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like a perfectly reasonable request to me, if someone is going to assess whether you are medically fit to work, then then it seems fair game to me that you should expect them to have the necessary qualifications to do so.

 

I haven't read of anyone approaching it from this angle before but I agree with HB that they will just more than likely reduce or even stop your money until you go to the assessment. Having said that I really admire you for taking the stand, as it is only by people doing this that there is any chance of getting a ridiculous process changed.

 

If you are going to be medically assessed then the person making the assessment has to be medicaally qualified, otherwise how can it be a correct assessment.

 

I wish you every success with this and hope that despite the sanctions thay are liable to bring against you, you are able to see it through, it won't be easy.

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

As honeybee and Simon have said, failure to attend a medical can result in sanction or termination of your ESA. They can lawfully do this in accordance with the ESA legislation.

 

There should not be an issue in ATOS providing you with the name of the HCP your appointment is to be with, to enable you to check the GMC or NMC registers to ensure they are registered to practice.

 

All HCP's performing assessments for DWP purposes have to be either registered with the GMC or NMC, and be approved by the Secretary of State to DWP.

 

Although ATOS can have assessors working for them whom are not registered with the GMC/NMC (such as an occupational therapist for example) these assessors cannot perform for the purposes of DWP assessments.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks for the welcome to the forum.

Erika I understand what you are saying that they can sanction or terminate my ESA and if that is the case then so be it, my main concern with the appointed HCP is their qualifications and their area of expertise, I for example don't want to be assessed by a midwife or anyone other than someone who is qualified in mental health issues which would result or at least should result in a fair assesment being taken. Once they give me that information I would gladly have the assesment provided the HCP was qualified in the field, this is now a matter of principal for me and I intend to see it out to the end no matter what the outcome.

I am going to call the ESA in the morning to ask why they have not supplied the information requested and will inform you all of the outcome all calls recorded lol.

Thanks for taking the time to read and answer my post

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Former ESA processor here. The ESA section at your BDC won't be able to tell you the name and/or professional qualifications of the HCP who would do your medical assessment. They're not being obstructive, they simply don't know and have no easy way to find out.

 

ATOS are the people to speak to about this.

 

Advice if you do call ESA, though: if you've made an FOI request or Subject Access Request, you shouldn't bother hassling the telephony staff. Simply state what it is you need and ask for a callback from the Customer Services team - they're the ones that deal with such things.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...