Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I cant help thinking that if we had to complete a questionaire that asked if you were "physically able bodied" before you were interviewed then this would be classed as discriminative.   Yet you can be asked to explain a gap in employment and that this is not classed as discriminative to people who may have had a mental breakdown.   Ok on this occasion I had taken a work break, if thay had asked a bout a break I had taken 10 years earlier then it would have been a different story as I had suffered depression and anxiety at that time.   It just seams to me that it puts people who have had a mental health issue at a disadvantage.      
    • I am just outside of the HS" zone for compulsory purchase. However,I put my house up for sale 4 weeks ago, and have had 2 viewers. Both said they like the house but the threat of HS2 having framework across the road put them off buying my house.    I am aware that I can take HS2 to court and get the court judge to (hopefully),force HS2 to purchase my house at market value under the Blight Order.    How do I go about starting the process?. Which court would the case go to?. Am i best enlisting a claims specialist with success in this field?.    The estate agent who my house is on the market with has told me that they have the feedback documentation from the 2 viewers testifying that HS2 put them off buying my house, so they would be available to the court.    Apparently there has already been 1 successful case on my street, and 1 two streets down, and there is another case on my street going through the court.    Any help, laws,quotes etc would be greatly appreciated.
    • Hi HubbaLoo and welcome to CAG   It's no surprise that the likes of CARS and Harlands  make far more charging admin fees than they do from taking a small monthly percentage of the gym fees.   It's best to tell CARS your new address - best that you know what they're up to at all times.   Send them a typed letter (no emails for now) saying:-   Dear sir or madam,   Membership at [town/city] DW Gym   My current address is as shown above.   I cancelled my membership when I relocated and supplied details of moving. I do NOT have to supply utility bills etc as demanded from you and will not enter into further correspondence with you.   If you continue to harass me for payments of admin fees, I will make formal complaints to the appropriate authorities.   Yours faithfully.    
    • It is not the DVLA that insist it must be insured, it is s.144A, Road Traffic Act 1988. Off road and SORN is one of the exceptions - s.144B of the same act.
    • Update  Ico and tpos are both useless Martin quinn has said to them that the signature on the tenancy agreement is diffrent and neither have asked for proof  The police have not given me an update on the supposed burglary or speakers that went missing that the man n van was meant to deliver  even after asking 9 times so now I'm trying to put pressure on them to tell me why they wont    I'm also going to try and get him under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 as what he has done is a criminal offence
  • Our picks

Fluffystuff

Egg card withdrawn, then D/N.

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3083 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

In February we received written notice that our Egg card had been withdrawn but the account "would remain open for repayment purposes only".

 

" In accordance with your Egg Card Terms & Conditions" your Egg card has been cancelled with immediate effect.

If there is an outstanding balance, you must keep making payments until it is repaid. The Egg Card Agreement will continue to apply until your balance is cleared when we will close your account."

 

 

We have just received a D/N and were wondering if the above notice of withdrawal of facility before the issue of a D/N, has any detrimental effect?

 

(By the way, the agreement is unenforceable as per PT's thread.)

Edited by Fluffystuff

Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The wording is very interesting.

I might be reading too much into this, but there could be an admission there...

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BEC01 - An admission as to it being unenforceable ??

 

Anybody else have any thoughts, in particular, does it have any bearing on the D/N?


Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issuance of a DN based on non-payment is precursor to withdrawing card privileges and attempted collection of the entire balance outstanding.

 

Egg chose to withdraw from further lending just as a cardholder may decide to abstain from further borrowing, but at the time of withdrawal Egg did not demand full repayment, only monthly minimum payment.

 

The subsequent issuance of DN would be justified by proven non-payment, unrelated to Egg's earlier decision to withdraw from further lending. These two different decisions are separately justified, the second not justified on the first and arguably not related to the first.

 

One cardholder went to High Court to try overturn his DN on the basis no copy of enforceable agreement was received from RBS. In court RBS did produce an agreement ruled by the judge as enforceable. For good measure the judge added that collection activities (other than CCJ, Charge Order, Attachment of Earnings etc which are the prerogative of the court) may proceed before enforceability is proven in court.

 

This ruling triggered by a proactive litigant upset cardholders big time. Once a ruling is made, it applies to everyone and inflences consideration by other judges even where they are not literally bound by legal precedent.


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your clarification Mistermind.


Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update ~

 

After months of silence, we have now been contacted by Fredricksons & Brian Carter demanding the full balance or else. Sent Egg CCA request in September '09 to which we received barely legible agreement (the approved limit kind) but no statements - a'c placed in dispute and we waited with baited breath for the outcome of 'pt's' case. Alas not the result we were all hoping for.

 

We have informed Fred & B Carter of the dispute and requested copies of the agreement and guess a SAR to Egg would be prudent.

 

Two questions ~

1. Any tips on dealing with Mr Carter?

2. If Egg had applied PPI to the account, we assume this would be shown as a monthly debit on the c/cd statements?


Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Advice needed please.

 

Fredrickson's have recently sent copies of agreement and statements.

 

1. I note the agreement only states the APR which I believe is not sufficient for cash withdrawals as these incur a 1.25% fee, thereby making the APR quoted inaccurate?

 

2. The D/N arrears amount includes penalty charges and if we had forwarded a chq allowing 8 working days for clearance (as Egg request) we would not have had 14 days to rectify.

 

3. The account was terminated in June 2010 (whilst in breach of s78 request) and charged off in Nov 2010.

 

My question is, are any of the above 'enough' to challenge the enforceability of this debt or as I suspect, should we begin negotiations for a F&F?

 

Opinions gratefully received.


Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice anybody??


Notwithstanding the fact that I sometimes ramble and I'm such a worrier, all postings are made with the best intent and entirely without prejudice.

You are welcome to use any information you may find here entirely at your own risk. Please do not hold it against me! :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...