Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA request denied


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send the SAR to the original creditor.

 

 

The original creditor?I have no idea!!Would this be Hillesden Securities Ltd(ie Hillesden against you)then,or Nolans whom the letter was received from?I believe Nolans to be a solicitor acting for Hillesden............8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo
The original creditor?I have no idea!!Would this be Hillesden Securities Ltd(ie Hillesden against you)then,or Nolans whom the letter was received from?I believe Nolans to be a solicitor acting for Hillesden............8-)

 

look at the correspondence you have. something must say who you owe money to. other than that, contact the people chasing you and ask if they own the debt or if not, who does. if need be, SAR everyone

 

its not hard, someone must have made a claim about who you owe money to, and business correspondence of this nature usually tells you if the author is a debt collector or a solictor or something else. Trace it back. the one most likely to have an agreement if it exists, is the original creditor as pinky says, but it seemed you were unsure of who that would be which why I made the advice above about the owner of the debt.

 

You can also get details of the courts decision from the court. that should tell you who the judgement was in favour of and may identify the original creditor

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok,I understand.... I did receive an email when I originally queried this debt and it states that the original debt is owed to a CitiFinancial...I now have their address so I will send off the relevant paperwork to them,thnx

Link to post
Share on other sites

as yet I have not got round to sending a subject access request,too much been happening lately!!!

Anyway,I am now receiving more letters from Nolans regarding Hillesden Securities Ltd.

They seem to be stepping up the hunt,maybe due to the fact they know I am seeking advice elsewhere.

Of the 2 letters I received today are a Service of Debt Advice and Info Package,basically a leaflet,received by Nolans,whom I sent the CCA to(should've sent to Hillesden)

Another letter received at the same time is from Alex M Adamson Messenger at Arms & Sheriff Officers,which states;

 

"Dear sir/madam

Hillesden Securites Ltd v You

 

We are instructed by Nolans,(address) in respect of the above matter to carry out an attachment against you for recovery of the outstanding sums due.

We would remind you that a Charge for Payment of money was served on you on 16th October 2008 for the sum of £1825.29.

 

We hereby give you notice that our officers will call for the purpose of executing an attachment ten days from today unless payment in the sum of £2024.50 is received by the above agents prior to that date"

 

So I guess I can expect a visit from a couple of wannabes,lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the process of printing out a Subject Access Request,top be sent to Hillesden Securities Ltd

If these clowns come to my door,before I knock them out shall I inform them that I am disputing the debt and have sent a SARN to Hillesden?

The knock out part was a joke,lol......Do I sign anything accept anything etc,

Thnx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the process of printing out a Subject Access Request,top be sent to Hillesden Securities Ltd

If these clowns come to my door,before I knock them out shall I inform them that I am disputing the debt and have sent a SARN to Hillesden?

The knock out part was a joke,lol......Do I sign anything accept anything etc,

Thnx

Sign nothing, acknowledge nothing and say as little as possible. Not even the priviledge of your name. All the proof burden is on them.

 

They won't be able to do squat!

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I recently contacted these Nolans clowns again...sending this

 

Dear Miss Taylor

 

Following a recent email and with reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement and a full breakdown of the account including any interest or charges applied.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 [sections 77-79], I am entitled to receive a copy of any credit agreement and a statement of account on request.

 

Should you require payment for this,I will forward a payment of £1.

I believe this would represent the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I understand a copy of any credit agreement along with a statement of account should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

I also understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with the request for a copy of the agreement and statement of account under these sections of the Act.

 

I should also remind you that any Court Judgement will have NO bearing on this request.

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

I just received this email back from them;

 

I refer to your email and advise that we have already outlined our position and in the circumstances will be proceeding.

 

If you still dispute this matter you will be required to seek your own legal advice.

 

We would remind you that we act on behalf of Hilleden Securites and under no circumstances should our clients be contacted by you directly.

 

Miss Taylor

 

 

wtf are they playing at?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We would remind you that we act on behalf of Hilleden Securites and under no circumstances should our clients be contacted by you directly.

No. They CANNOT prohibit you from writing direct to your original creditor and requesting your CCA. They also CANNOT prohibit you from serving a SARN request to the original creditor.

 

Have you served the CCA request to Citi Financial? I believe they are your OC?

 

Hillesden and Nolans are further down the chain.

 

You want to reach the stage where CF are in breach of your S77-79 request, the debt is legal in dispute and the provisions of S77-79(6) now apply - which basically means they can't enforce until they remedy the breach.

The matrix is intrinsically flawed. Within it is the program for it's own destruction. If you are reading this, you are in the matrix and it's days are numbered...so watch out! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading through rather quickly and the thing that has struck me and I may have missed it, did you ever received a summons, for this Court Case, prior to the Judgement, you say you received 'the decision' in 2008, but was that the first your heard from any Court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading through rather quickly and the thing that has struck me and I may have missed it, did you ever received a summons, for this Court Case, prior to the Judgement, you say you received 'the decision' in 2008, but was that the first your heard from any Court?

 

Hi,I don't recall if it was a summons as such,but I did agree to make repayments,apparently this was in response to a letter I received from court(summons?)

This was done a bit hastily on my part and in hindsight I should've put in a defence against this debt,as I am now in doubt as to whether it is mine.Receiving a letter from Court kind of makes you think the debt is indeed yours,thus agreeing to make repayments

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. They CANNOT prohibit you from writing direct to your original creditor and requesting your CCA. They also CANNOT prohibit you from serving a SARN request to the original creditor.

 

Have you served the CCA request to Citi Financial? I believe they are your OC?

 

Hillesden and Nolans are further down the chain.

 

You want to reach the stage where CF are in breach of your S77-79 request, the debt is legal in dispute and the provisions of S77-79(6) now apply - which basically means they can't enforce until they remedy the breach.

 

 

Hi Matrix,

I have not served the CCA request to CitiFinancial,I sent this to these Nolans people.I do not have any contact information for CitiFinancial,address etc.

I am currently responding to the last email I received from Nolans regarding them telling me NOT to contact Hillesden.Do you have any suggestions as to how I should respond as politely as poss;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

will have a look at your thread,but I am no expert here.I must say though,I got a car from Yes car years ago,returned car as timing belt broke,they still wanted over £6k...Got some very useful advice here,sent a CCA letter then received notice back that they would not contact me again regarding debt,lol...so you in the right place;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just got in and a letter from a certain dca..regarding an amount of just over £800 from a bank..i checked my credit file and a certain low dca has been checking my file every month for the last 6 months. What are my first steps in fighting this?..do i ask the dca for a cca? the first default was in 2005 according to my credit file..also how to get them to remove the searches as they werent authorised? (and yes it is me, i am back, after getting a kicking on behalf of my wife, but that is now sorted)..i just want to know my full rights and how to go about tackkling these lowlifes as they have also mentioned bankruptcy!! I have only just fought ousba and won over a ccj and has been removed, enabling me to get a bank upgrade within a week! Also been able to get a mobile phone on contract so dont want these gits messing things up for me..thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

forgot to mention,I did get a doorstep visit from Nolans chapI did not let him in.The guy was as interested in getting the debt as I was paying it!!!!

He asked if I had a car,then he answered no for me,lol....Basically told me to watch in case 'they' find out where you work,then they can take steps to arrest your wages until the debt is paid off..

What a nice little man he was.I think these lads basically know as soon as they see a person,what they will or won't get away with asking you,maybe my appearance scared him,lol....:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading through rather quickly and the thing that has struck me and I may have missed it, did you ever received a summons, for this Court Case, prior to the Judgement, you say you received 'the decision' in 2008, but was that the first your heard from any Court?

 

I'm with you here HS, I'm sensing you feel that there might not actually be a judgment.

 

OC checked their credit files I see and default was registered but no mention of the CCJ?

 

Seems very sus to me.

 

I'd wager upon a little digging the CCJ will turn out to be a faux Court letter from a DCA. Certainly hope so.

 

Give them both barrels if this is the case, claiming a judgment exists, producing letters intended to deceive the debtor into believing they're from Court etc. etc. All practices very much frowned upon by the OFT etc.

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have again looked at my credit report and there is nowhere that says CCJ.Regarding the Hillesden 'debt' it says next to it 'Default'....Jasper,do you really think they would send a false court letter in order to deceive me?

I sent off a CCA request and payment to Citi,this was sent recorded delivery and was delivered on 14th June 2010.I have not heard back from them regarding this.I have,however,received another letter from Nolans saying;

 

"We refer to the above matter and to our earlier letter advising you that our clients would be prepared to accept an instalment offer from you in respect of the aboves debt.We note that we have not heard from you in response to our clients offer"

YOU ARE NOW ON NOTICE THAT FAILING AGREEMENT OF INSTALMENT PAYMENTS WITHIN SEVEN DAYS WE SHALL PROCEED WITH ENFORCEMENT AGAINST YOU.

Should you wish to discuss your account with us,please call ************

 

There is then an attachment form for standing order etc!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...