Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hfo, sent photo of my house.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4593 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need help urgently please.

Last week i got a call from someone who i could barely understand and found to be very impolite so i put the phone down on him. He has been phoning me at least a dozen times a day from a mobile phone (ive got caller id) Now he has sent a letter demanding money i owe to Barclaycard (i dont deny the fact) which i think is a lot more than i originally owed, also a photocopy of my house and a photocopy of my experian credit report with the barclaycard debt highlighted. I feel very threatened by the photo of my house (which belongs to the council so i dont know why he sent a photocopy of it) and very vunerable when i am on my own. Does it mean hes watching me? Please help me urgently, i am at my wits end, very frightened and having sleepless nights. What should i do?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and Welcome,

 

I'll move this thread to a more appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's likely the photo is from Google Streetview. I'd b tempted to write to HFO enclosing copies of what they sent you, and demand to know why they are in breach of Office of Fair Trading guidelines. Also ask for a copy of their complaint's procedure. Also a complaint to the OFT in these circumstances is a good idea, as HFO are harassing you.

 

You can send them the "Harassment by Telphone" template from the forum template library. Also send them the "Prove I owe anything" letter in a seperate envelope.

 

Can you post what they have sent? Remove any personal details first. Then we can advise you on what to do when they respond to your complaint and prove it letter.

 

You are under no legal obligation to speak to them on the phone. If they call. Just say, "In writing only please." And hang up. Also if anyone turns up on your doorstep, refuse to speak to them and lock the door. If they don't leave, call the police and tell them someone is on your property, and as you're on your own and they are using threatening and intimidating bahaviour, you'd like an officer to attend and remove them.

Always remember that DCA's are not bailiffs, and have no more rights than the postman or paperboy when it comes to knocking on your door. If asked to leave, then they should do so.

  • Haha 1

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as fuzzybobble says, don't deal with them in ANY form other than writting.

 

A good tip when they call and ask to go through security is to refuse to go through security. If they ask why just tell them as it is "becuase if I don't confirm my details and you continue to discuss this account you will be in breach of the Data Protection Act for which you will be personally liable as well as the company you work for, bye"

 

They have a lot less power than you think, in fact they tend to only have as much power as we allow them (or a court if it get's that far).

 

Have you asked them for a copy of the agreement ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would make a point od demanding to know why there is a photo of your house sent through. If they are stupid enough to admit they use this tactic to scare people they will be shooting themselves in the foot.

 

Make sure you complain to the OFT about the photo regardless of what reason they give (or more likley don't give).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Grief!

 

After the Bank Holiday, telephone Consumer Direct in order to make a complaint about this firm

 

Consumer Direct, is the consumer arm of the Office of Fair Trading;

ask them to log your complaint and pass it on to the OFT statistics. They will also put you in touch with your local Trading Standards, who should take up the matter for you.

 

It would also appear that, this is a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998;

there is a complaint form on the ICO website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unlikely to be HFO ringing you from mobile number, it will be some ****** field agent they have farmed it out to.

 

Having said that HFO are responsible for the actions of their 3rd party collectors.

 

This is blatant intimidation and should be reported.

 

I cant make out what the letter says as it too small to read

Link to post
Share on other sites

HFO are well out of order here. You MUST report them and as you feel vulnerable take their letter to your local CAB and see if they can do anything.

 

Sending a photo of your house is really naff, it doesnt prove they are watching you, Googleimages have pics of all the streets which are about 2 years old... I would also wait until the elections and take this claptrap to your local MP and demand action against this type of intimidation.

 

You could also send it to Watchdog and to Tony Heatherington of the Daily Mail.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remove your personal details you have left account number and amount owing

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pic of where I live on google was done last year. There is a bush my neighbour planted last summer in their garden, and also the car they sold just before christmas.

 

Send them the "Prove it letter" letter first. They can have as many pics as they like of your house, but without a CCA they're stuffed anyway.

 

Also if the Barclaycard was first taken out before 2007, then it's unlikely that they can produce an enforceable CCA anyway. I've yet to see anything from Barclaycard that is eforceable pre 2007.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send that letter to trading standards, they are investigating this company, it sounds as if they are operating offshore from the poor level of grammar in the letter.

 

I also believe that this company are hiding in India now and using outsourced workers to call people. They really do need to be reported via Consumer Direct as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou everyone for your help, i really dont know what im doing. I keep forgetting its bank holiday, im at work tonight and im really tired. Must get ready now but please keep sending your replies, will look again tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

what letters do i need to send to them, ive never heard from Barclaycard for years. The experian credit report says default date 05/01/2007 and default balance $1,983, current balance $2,001 and HFO balance $2,795.36. There seems to be a big difference in figures (I cant find the pound sign) Which one is the real balance because i do owe barclaycard money and wiling to come to an arrangement and pay it off but not to HFO - id never heard of them

Link to post
Share on other sites

How nice, they want to help!

 

A picture of your house? what will these people try next

 

As said, complain to OFT, Trading Standards and CAB (anyone else you can think of as well!)

 

I have a stack of letters from worthless cretins like this shower, they threaten everything and do nothing because they are powerless without a court order (and the chances of them getting that on a Barclaycard debt and pretty remote - especially with the help you'd get from all of us)

 

Pour yourself a nice drink and dont give these idiots a moments worry

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...