Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax problem for renting privately without contract


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry for this lenghy post and if anyone can help it would be much appreciated.

 

My mate rent a house privately without any written contract from a landlord from Dec 2007 to Jun 2008.

 

Recently she received a council tax bill from local authority asking her to pay for the period upto April 2009. She called the office to say that she had not been living in that property since Jun 2008 and also she has showed the evidence proving this and made a writen declarition saying that she was not living in that proporty. As I thought this should be enough to waive that bill.

 

But what the council said was she would still have to be liable for paying that council tax unless obtaining a written confirmation from the landlord. This is because that landlord reported to the council that she moved out on April 2009. The landlord is just lying as he doesn't want to pay for that money which should be his liability.

 

The reasons why my mate has to pay for that money according to the authority are:

 

1. Eventhough she is not living in that property, she may still be liable for the council tax even she is living in another property.

2. As she failed to inform the authority within 21 days after moving out and she had no contract with the landlord, the check-out date will sololy depent on what landlord has reported to the authority. ( assuming if the landlord reported she checked out today, she will have to pay the tax up to today) THIS IS UNFAIR!!!! WHO GAVE THE LANDLORD THIS RIGHT TO DO WHATEVER HE WANTS TO!!!

 

 

Well, in order to avoid this bill so far is having to get a confirmation from the landlord, unfortunately my mate can't hold of him. And I thought if he had done this on purpose, why on earth he would provide something against him.

 

By now my mate intend not to pay this and leave it the court to judge, but she worries if the court is in favor against her then the bill will be even more to pay at the end of the day.

 

She is helpless and desperate and can anyone HELP PLEASE!!!

 

MANY MANY MANY BIG THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!!

 

OSCAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them where it is laid down that they can only accept a statement from the landlord. If you have other paperwork especially a council tax bill for you new property, I can't see that they can refuse this on a whim.

 

First sentence in the council collection of taxes is 'make as much money as you can even if you have to lie and cheat to do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff, thanks for your prompt reply.

 

Well, my mate has already showed the council with the tenancy agreement for the new property which indicated her not living in that property. however, the council would not accept that. They may only accept a confirmation for the landlord. I thought this was really stupid as first I cannot get hold of the landlord and second if the landlord did this on purple to avoid the bill, why he should provide anything to us to against him.LOL!!

 

The only thing is my mate didn't sign a contract with that landlord, can this give him the right to the report to the authority whatever he said? This is not fair!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely it's up to the landlord to furnish a proper rental agreement to show the property was occupied by your friend.

 

But the fact was there was no such contract at all and my mate has proved to the council that she was not occuping that property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, forgot to tell one thing.

 

Since my mate cannot get hold to the landlord, and then she asked if council can contact the landlord to solve this problem. The funniest thing is they cannot get hold to the landlord either as they dont have information.

 

On the other hand, the council insist requiring my mate to that stupid confirmation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the fact was there was no such contract at all and my mate has proved to the council that she was not occuping that property.

 

Exactly. They may as well come after any of us for their money and expect us to prove we weren't living there. The person responsible for the council tax is the owner of the property unless they can prove there were tenants incumbent. The council can't just chase random people because they can't trace the owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. They may as well come after any of us for their money and expect us to prove we weren't living there. The person responsible for the council tax is the owner of the property unless they can prove there were tenants incumbent. The council can't just chase random people because they can't trace the owner.

 

The council told my mate that since she had no contract with the L/L and she failed to informed the council when she moved out, in this case, the L/L can say anything about the moving-out date (even up to today or any time in the furture) and he doesn't even have to prove it with any B&W documents. This is really ridiculous and unfair to my mate.

 

Since I though if the landlord cannot provide anything (contract) to suport that my mate lived there, the council could take some factual evidents from my mate (eg. new contract proving she is leaving somewhere else) to take her name off from the paying list. Unfortunately this is not the case so far!!!!!!!!

 

Does anyone know is this true that if there was no contract and then landlord can do whatever he can? OH DEAR!! if this is true I will be laughing with tears!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'll wait for someone with more knowledge to come along but I'd have thought they have to prove the debt. If your mate can show they have been living elsewhere and paying coucil tax for that address I'd say they have a pretty good case if the council take it to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'll wait for someone with more knowledge to come along but I'd have thought they have to prove the debt. If your mate can show they have been living elsewhere and paying coucil tax for that address I'd say they have a pretty good case if the council take it to court.

 

 

Yes that was what I thought as well, however the council argued that even my mate was living somewhere else she might still be liable for both properties eventhough she was not living in that property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council can argue that but as she has no connection with that property it sounds like a load of twaddle to me. She doesn't own it and she doesn't live there. There isn't even any evidence to suggest she did live there. There may be evidence that she paid the council tax at one time. I paid my brother's for a short time when he was experiencing difficulties, doesn't mean I'm responsible in the future just because I wrote them a couple of cheques.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council can argue that but as she has no connection with that property it sounds like a load of twaddle to me. She doesn't own it and she doesn't live there. There isn't even any evidence to suggest she did live there. There may be evidence that she paid the council tax at one time. I paid my brother's for a short time when he was experiencing difficulties, doesn't mean I'm responsible in the future just because I wrote them a couple of cheques.

 

 

Thanks hightail, this makes sense. The only problem now is that landlord reported my mate lived there until April 2009 and council counted on his words and he even dosen't need to prove any evidence, simple due to no contract was signed between them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, forgot to tell one thing.

 

Since my mate cannot get hold to the landlord, and then she asked if council can contact the landlord to solve this problem. The funniest thing is they cannot get hold to the landlord either as they dont have information.

 

On the other hand, the council insist requiring my mate to that stupid confirmation.

 

All the council has to do is check with the land regisitry to see the owner of the property indeed your mate can do this as well for a small fee.

 

Perhaps it is one of these people in the council that owns the property and they know how to stitch people up, these council officials have no morals regarding joe public the tax payer. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you dealing with the council when you phone or letter them

most councils contract out council tax administration and enforcement

therefore when you think you are dealing with the council you are not

 

one of these company's is capita who own Equita bailiffs so its in there own interest to collect as much council tax arrears as possible regardless of who owes it

 

personally i would write a formal complaint to the chief executive of your council include a copy of your tenancy agreement for the year they are chasing that you don't owe tell them if its not sorted your next step is a complaint to the local government ombudsman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all guys giving suggestions here.

 

Updated:

 

I have just called valuation tribunal and advised to write a letter to the council saying my mate disagree that she should be liable for that bill. If the response is still negative, then my mate will have a appeal to valuation tribunal for a hearing to decide.

 

I will keep updating here for the progress for information.

 

Cheers all!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

!

Thanks to all guys giving suggestions here.

 

Updated:

 

I have just called valuation tribunal and advised to write a letter to the council saying my mate disagree that she should be liable for that bill. If the response is still negative, then my mate will have a appeal to valuation tribunal for a hearing to decide.

 

I will keep updating here for the progress for information.

 

Cheers all!!!!!

 

 

I believe the council goes for whoever is the easiest to contact or easiest to get the money out of! I am a landlord who let a house without a contract, (silly I know, but to family and I thought that would be ok, but they did a bunk and didnt pay the rent). The council want me to pay it and have charged me for the whole period they were there and they have stated that I have to prove that they lived there!! I have a separate period of time in the hands of the Valuation Tribunal and the council are refusing to accept that these tenants were in my house and are insisting that it becomes part of the period disputed with the Tribunal!!

 

I wish I had your council who I could tell what I wanted and they would believe it!!!

 

Good luck.

 

JQ

Edited by jqinfo
Spelling. Doh!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...