Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have a minimum of 10 minutes' grace period to find a parking space, read the signs, walk to the stores, later walk back, etc.  There is no maximum.  I think in COVID times when you had to wash your hands thoroughly after consuming food and there was a queue to do so 😉 13 minutes is not excessive and the fleecers' claim can be easily batted off.
    • I offered to read the meter for them based on prepayment of £2400 but they didn't respond.   I also offered to wave the fee for doing so if they send me reasonably estimated bills.
    • Agree completely.  What is disturbing is that VCS actually went for an appeal, the motorists were too lazy to turn up so Simon now has an appeal level verdict in his favour.
    • There were a number of matters that concern me in Judge Saffman's verdict. The first is  that you cannot form a contract with a forbidding  rule. This was not the case in PE v Beavis as it was within the bounds of a carpark where motorists were allowed to park their cars.  Also if a motorist who does stop when apparently they shouldn't is therefore a trespasser and as such VCS cannot sue for trespass only the landowner can do that. Secondly and the Judges in the Beavis case alluded to the fact that while the amount charged -£85- was not a penalty, that had he offence been one of secondary importance then the charge would have been a penalty.To pull off the road for 30 seconds would in most people's view be of secondary importance and therefore a penalty. It is interesting to note that the new Appeals charter for motorists will include mitigating reasons and a tiered system to differentiate between major and minor offences.  On top of that what does a driver do if a pedestrian walks out on to the road. At the moment it looks as if the driver has to run them over since to stop would bring on a fine. That would be ridiculous. And what about a tyre burst or a collision between two vehicles? The Law for the latter  is that you have to stop and exchange details. And there are several other reasons why a motorist may have to stop and none of them would be mitigating. And for every case where a "no stopping" rule has been upheld by a Judge, there have been about  five where the decision has gone the other way.   The Judge paid too much attention to the Beavis case and took its arguments into consideration to justify his reasons when the Beavis case had little similarity to the no stopping case which was confirmed by the District Judge who staed that the two cases "were substantially different on the facts".  
    • Ok I sent off my letter to Gladstone and MB, now the waiting game. I showed MSE and National Consumer Service my letter before claim response and the majority people were not impressed with my letter.   But after reading this quote on CAG, it feels like the next best approach regardless: ''No, it is not a joke reply. The more you show these con artists respect the more they will try to fleece you. Don't fill in their Section D. Treat them with contempt. They're not the police or the council, they have no right to this money and they know it.''   I still feel I've made the right decision but I feel doubtful at times with the wide amount of different opinions people have approaching this situation on the MSE and National Consumer Service forums.   (When I put in p.e.p.i.p.o.o it auto corrects to National Consumer Service)  
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

can British Gas disconnect me?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2794 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have a mega bill from them and have gone a repayment plan (a plastic repayment card sent to me in the post, the works). The Indian call centre operative in their debt collection wing threatened me with (a) Experian and (b) having my gas supply cut off.

 

was wondering where the law stood with that?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you dont pay then yes they can cut you off

PGH7447

 

 

Getting There Slowly

---------

 

Advice is given freely but is in no way meant to be taken as Gospel:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, I was pretty sure they could. I was wondering though if there may be special rules about not disconnecting vulnerable people like if there are kids living at the address etc. I had a vague recollection that the Water utilities can't disconnect and wondered if that was true of gas.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is

 

Gas arrears and disconnection

 

If you have gas arrears, you risk being disconnected. However, it is very unusual to be disconnected if you fail to pay your gas bills.

If you have gas arrears, seek help from an experienced adviser, urgently if you have been threatened with disconnection, for example, a Citizens Advice Bureau To search for details of your nearest CAB, including those that can give advice by email, click on openinnewwin.gifnearest CAB.

Steps your supplier must follow before disconnecting you

 

A gas supplier must follow standard licence conditions, one of which sets out how it deals with customers who have difficulty paying. A gas supplier cannot issue a disconnection notice until at least 28 days after issuing a bill. You must be given at least seven days notice of disconnection. If you can't pay your bill, contact your supplier straight away. You should be offered an arrangement to pay off the arrears at a rate you can afford. If you can't afford to pay off the arrears in this way, they must offer to install a prepayment meter – see under heading Meters.

 

Some groups of customers may have extra protection from being disconnected. This may apply to you if you:

  • are of pensionable age
  • have long-term ill-health
  • are disabled
  • have severe financial problems.

-----------------------

There are also rules about threatmonkeys who threaten customers with all manner of dire consequences, so make a complaint about the guy who dealt with you

PGH7447

 

 

Getting There Slowly

---------

 

Advice is given freely but is in no way meant to be taken as Gospel:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
there is

 

have severe financial problems.

 

Certainly applies. Any idea what their criteria is?

I have to say though that they always deal with this by 'phone and I get put through to these bl**dy awful foreign call centres that are often impossible to communicate properly with and who use their poor levels of spoken English as a means of bamboozling you.

 

Is it possible to negotiate with British gas by post?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its worth a try but I bet my hat they'll write asking me to 'phone Bangalore 0845.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Indian call centre operative in their debt collectionlink3.gif wing threatened me with (a) experianlink3.gif and (b) having my gas supply cut off.

 

If this was done whilst you were negotiating a payment plan this was an unfair practice.

 

If after a plan was negotiated it is nuts and shows that BG have still not got their internal communications sorted.

 

They can off course threaten disconnection if you are not paying but a warrant of entry for disconnection etc must be heard by a magistrate, If you turn up in court to defend the application wil be withdrawn. They are only interested in getting easy warrants by default - which means that no defence case has been offered. The idea that applications will always be granted by the court stems form the fact that very few customers actually turn up to court so default warrants are the routine (dealt with at the rate of 40-60 an hour!!!).

 

Why the mega bill? - if you look into this you may well have grounds to dispute it. e.g. Estimated bills sent for more than 2 years. No bill sent for longer than one year. Poor or no monitoring of a direct debit plan. Have you checked the bill fully and compared it to your own meter reading and meter number

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The background to the mega bill was that it was a 'blank' meter in a rental flat and we set up a new account with British Gas. When we left after 10 months we gave a meter readijg and bingo the mega bill. In the meantime we had been receiving small estimated bills.

 

The threats WERE made while negotaiting a repayment plan and, while unfair practice, were nonetheless made and by a bloke in a Madras call centre who couldn't give a @!"£! and therein lies the problem.

 

You are dead right about the litigant in person thing. DJs hate lay people turning up to defend themselves and the solicitors who send their clerks along to get repos, CCJs, warrants, injunctions etc also hate litigants in person at the district courts.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

so sar BG and demand to know who paid the bill before you, I assume you have start and end dates to your tenancy

PGH7447

 

 

Getting There Slowly

---------

 

Advice is given freely but is in no way meant to be taken as Gospel:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do you mean it was a blank meter when you moved in? Were any further meter reads obtained? give a few sets of current read and demand if your opening meter read was estimated that it be revised based on your actual energy usage.

 

Are you sure that BG didnt suggest disconnection would be a consequence if the pay arrangement would not be kept to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble with that approach Nottslad is that they have vacated the flat!

 

Seems to me that there was a meter reading given to BG at the beginnung of the tenancy because the OP arranged a supply with BG (blank meter??? does he mean 0 most unlikely) so his bill must have based on actual readings by the OP.

 

MOZZ1

 

How big was the 'megabill'? Does it seem reasonable to you? Maybe there are reasons that it is large - for instance an old neter reading in cubic feet but charged in cubic meters.(around 9x larger bill) Are you sure that the first bill was not based on an estimate of your start reading. What does a blank meter mean?

 

BG can only disconnect gas for arrears if you are actually in residence so that guy in India was talking double nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a VERY old property, with a very old gas meter..........

The meter reading was accurate but the cubic feet theory sits well with what's happened. Our usage of gas I would say is average and the bill was for £790 for an approx 9 month period (or £351 a quarter which seems steep to me). Besides, the buggers never came to read the meter and sent miniscule estimated bills all that time.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are dead right about the litigant in person thing. DJs hate lay people turning up to defend themselves and the solicitors who send their clerks along to get repos, CCJs, warrants, injunctions etc also hate litigants in person at the district courts.

 

You have got your courts mixed.

 

Warrants for entry to disconnect are heard in the magistrate courts. These courts set aside a short session (about 20 mins) to deal with applications from one utility. There may be 30 to 50 applications "heard" at these sessions and default warrants are simply rubber stamped by the magistrate. If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
You have got your courts mixed.

 

If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

 

Even better then ;-)

Thanks for the heads up. Point is that turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the property and occupation these amounts are not excessiive. Certainly they are too low for a mis- conversion of a cubic foot meter. If this had been the case the bills would have been 27x higher than expected - my 9x factor in my previous post was an error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Yes, I have been paying them anyway. But you don't know what grief I have endured negotiating with their threatening debt collectors in India - hence my query about being disconnected (which was made when I rang them first time around to dicuss the bill; they also threatened a credit reference agency before trying to con me into making 4 large payments). In the end I got them to break it down into 13 payments.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites
If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

 

Not always correct, as several courts that i visit for warrant applications will postpone the hearing. A time is booked usually 1 to 2 weeks later when more time is given so that both parties can put their side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what has also happened in my experience Steve.

 

If you've vacated the flat and your tenancy has ended, why would the be disconnecting you? Are they the supplier at your current address?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Steve

 

Of course you are right that one of the other things a warrant officer can do is to leave the application in but withdraw it fom the rubberstamp session and request a later hearing. That could happen but not often.

 

My experience is that warrant officers are not properly briefed - they know this - and cannot possibly present a case at one of these default sessions should there be by chance time enough to hear a case properly. To be on the safe side they withdraw the application from the session. When they then investigate the case (the defendant is present) with a proper hearing in mind they most often find very good reasons not to proceed.

 

The very high frequency of default warrants (i.e. undefended) has encouraged utilities to think that poorly prepared ( sometimes completely mistaken) cases will do and their customers to think that granting of warrants is automatic. Most of the cases on these forums are complicated and applications will be withdrawn totally if the customer is present to defend - there is little possibility of actually going into court at that time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

 

Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites
turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

 

Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats what has also happened in my experience Steve.

 

If you've vacated the flat and your tenancy has ended, why would the be disconnecting you? Are they the supplier at your current address?

 

Yep, I took them with me to my new address (then I got the bill).

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites
Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

 

Everybody is given notifation of the court date and time, and indeed more should turn up. As a person who applies for warrants i personally hate it when someone turns up. I always try to resolve the matter prior to the court hearing, and will always contact the utility company whilst with the customer. If there is a genuine dispute on the case then it will get postponed, or indeed cancelled. People have to turn up first though.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question - if you turn up and have a genuine case i.e. they should not be applying for a warrant at all, can you have them pay your costs of turning up (e.g. travel costs, loss of earnings for the time you have taken off work, etc)?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...