Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

can British Gas disconnect me?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a mega bill from them and have gone a repayment plan (a plastic repayment card sent to me in the post, the works). The Indian call centre operative in their debt collection wing threatened me with (a) Experian and (b) having my gas supply cut off.

 

was wondering where the law stood with that?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, I was pretty sure they could. I was wondering though if there may be special rules about not disconnecting vulnerable people like if there are kids living at the address etc. I had a vague recollection that the Water utilities can't disconnect and wondered if that was true of gas.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is

 

Gas arrears and disconnection

 

If you have gas arrears, you risk being disconnected. However, it is very unusual to be disconnected if you fail to pay your gas bills.

If you have gas arrears, seek help from an experienced adviser, urgently if you have been threatened with disconnection, for example, a Citizens Advice Bureau To search for details of your nearest CAB, including those that can give advice by email, click on openinnewwin.gifnearest CAB.

Steps your supplier must follow before disconnecting you

 

A gas supplier must follow standard licence conditions, one of which sets out how it deals with customers who have difficulty paying. A gas supplier cannot issue a disconnection notice until at least 28 days after issuing a bill. You must be given at least seven days notice of disconnection. If you can't pay your bill, contact your supplier straight away. You should be offered an arrangement to pay off the arrears at a rate you can afford. If you can't afford to pay off the arrears in this way, they must offer to install a prepayment meter – see under heading Meters.

 

Some groups of customers may have extra protection from being disconnected. This may apply to you if you:

  • are of pensionable age
  • have long-term ill-health
  • are disabled
  • have severe financial problems.

-----------------------

There are also rules about threatmonkeys who threaten customers with all manner of dire consequences, so make a complaint about the guy who dealt with you

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is

 

have severe financial problems.

 

Certainly applies. Any idea what their criteria is?

I have to say though that they always deal with this by 'phone and I get put through to these bl**dy awful foreign call centres that are often impossible to communicate properly with and who use their poor levels of spoken English as a means of bamboozling you.

 

Is it possible to negotiate with British gas by post?

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Indian call centre operative in their debt collectionlink3.gif wing threatened me with (a) experianlink3.gif and (b) having my gas supply cut off.

 

If this was done whilst you were negotiating a payment plan this was an unfair practice.

 

If after a plan was negotiated it is nuts and shows that BG have still not got their internal communications sorted.

 

They can off course threaten disconnection if you are not paying but a warrant of entry for disconnection etc must be heard by a magistrate, If you turn up in court to defend the application wil be withdrawn. They are only interested in getting easy warrants by default - which means that no defence case has been offered. The idea that applications will always be granted by the court stems form the fact that very few customers actually turn up to court so default warrants are the routine (dealt with at the rate of 40-60 an hour!!!).

 

Why the mega bill? - if you look into this you may well have grounds to dispute it. e.g. Estimated bills sent for more than 2 years. No bill sent for longer than one year. Poor or no monitoring of a direct debit plan. Have you checked the bill fully and compared it to your own meter reading and meter number

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The background to the mega bill was that it was a 'blank' meter in a rental flat and we set up a new account with British Gas. When we left after 10 months we gave a meter readijg and bingo the mega bill. In the meantime we had been receiving small estimated bills.

 

The threats WERE made while negotaiting a repayment plan and, while unfair practice, were nonetheless made and by a bloke in a Madras call centre who couldn't give a @!"£! and therein lies the problem.

 

You are dead right about the litigant in person thing. DJs hate lay people turning up to defend themselves and the solicitors who send their clerks along to get repos, CCJs, warrants, injunctions etc also hate litigants in person at the district courts.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do you mean it was a blank meter when you moved in? Were any further meter reads obtained? give a few sets of current read and demand if your opening meter read was estimated that it be revised based on your actual energy usage.

 

Are you sure that BG didnt suggest disconnection would be a consequence if the pay arrangement would not be kept to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble with that approach Nottslad is that they have vacated the flat!

 

Seems to me that there was a meter reading given to BG at the beginnung of the tenancy because the OP arranged a supply with BG (blank meter??? does he mean 0 most unlikely) so his bill must have based on actual readings by the OP.

 

MOZZ1

 

How big was the 'megabill'? Does it seem reasonable to you? Maybe there are reasons that it is large - for instance an old neter reading in cubic feet but charged in cubic meters.(around 9x larger bill) Are you sure that the first bill was not based on an estimate of your start reading. What does a blank meter mean?

 

BG can only disconnect gas for arrears if you are actually in residence so that guy in India was talking double nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a VERY old property, with a very old gas meter..........

The meter reading was accurate but the cubic feet theory sits well with what's happened. Our usage of gas I would say is average and the bill was for £790 for an approx 9 month period (or £351 a quarter which seems steep to me). Besides, the buggers never came to read the meter and sent miniscule estimated bills all that time.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are dead right about the litigant in person thing. DJs hate lay people turning up to defend themselves and the solicitors who send their clerks along to get repos, CCJs, warrants, injunctions etc also hate litigants in person at the district courts.

 

You have got your courts mixed.

 

Warrants for entry to disconnect are heard in the magistrate courts. These courts set aside a short session (about 20 mins) to deal with applications from one utility. There may be 30 to 50 applications "heard" at these sessions and default warrants are simply rubber stamped by the magistrate. If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have got your courts mixed.

 

If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

 

Even better then ;-)

Thanks for the heads up. Point is that turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the property and occupation these amounts are not excessiive. Certainly they are too low for a mis- conversion of a cubic foot meter. If this had been the case the bills would have been 27x higher than expected - my 9x factor in my previous post was an error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Yes, I have been paying them anyway. But you don't know what grief I have endured negotiating with their threatening debt collectors in India - hence my query about being disconnected (which was made when I rang them first time around to dicuss the bill; they also threatened a credit reference agency before trying to con me into making 4 large payments). In the end I got them to break it down into 13 payments.

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you turn up to defend this cosy system is not possible so the application is withdrawn and the utility will try something else.

 

Not always correct, as several courts that i visit for warrant applications will postpone the hearing. A time is booked usually 1 to 2 weeks later when more time is given so that both parties can put their side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Steve

 

Of course you are right that one of the other things a warrant officer can do is to leave the application in but withdraw it fom the rubberstamp session and request a later hearing. That could happen but not often.

 

My experience is that warrant officers are not properly briefed - they know this - and cannot possibly present a case at one of these default sessions should there be by chance time enough to hear a case properly. To be on the safe side they withdraw the application from the session. When they then investigate the case (the defendant is present) with a proper hearing in mind they most often find very good reasons not to proceed.

 

The very high frequency of default warrants (i.e. undefended) has encouraged utilities to think that poorly prepared ( sometimes completely mistaken) cases will do and their customers to think that granting of warrants is automatic. Most of the cases on these forums are complicated and applications will be withdrawn totally if the customer is present to defend - there is little possibility of actually going into court at that time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

 

Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

turning up at court can be the right thing to do.

 

Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what has also happened in my experience Steve.

 

If you've vacated the flat and your tenancy has ended, why would the be disconnecting you? Are they the supplier at your current address?

 

Yep, I took them with me to my new address (then I got the bill).

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turning up in court is nearly always the right thing to do. Unless you know that the arrears are completely fair, that the repayment schedule is semsible for you, that you are not classified as vulnerable and that the utility is putting a fair case how can you let them get away with a default warrant?

 

Everybody is given notifation of the court date and time, and indeed more should turn up. As a person who applies for warrants i personally hate it when someone turns up. I always try to resolve the matter prior to the court hearing, and will always contact the utility company whilst with the customer. If there is a genuine dispute on the case then it will get postponed, or indeed cancelled. People have to turn up first though.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question - if you turn up and have a genuine case i.e. they should not be applying for a warrant at all, can you have them pay your costs of turning up (e.g. travel costs, loss of earnings for the time you have taken off work, etc)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...