Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell And Old Egg Card Debt


onestressedwoman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a problem with egg

 

In January last year I requested a copy of CCA which was not provided -

 

They then sent me a letter directly asking me to sign a form and return it to them my representative sent them a letter informing them that contact with me directly was classed as harrasment and informing them that all correspondance should be directed to her.

 

In May a letter was sent stating that as they had not provided a copy of any CCA then this debt was not enforcable - to no response

 

However I have now been contacted by Lowells / Hamptons Legal

Demanding payment threats etc continuous calls

 

I have spoken to the company that were representing me but unfortunately the girl who was dealing with my file has left and the new person has not done any work on the file

 

I don't know what to do now as they are telling me that Egg doesn't have to supply me with CCA to enforce debt

 

What can I /should I do Egg as had over a year to supply me with CCA

 

How can they transfer this matter to another DCA?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They can't. I would send the following letters to Lowells (amend to suit):

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the **original creditor/DCA** and has been since DATE.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My last letter from **original creditor/DCA** was DATE and intimated that my complaint would be resolved on **DATE**, this obviously hasn’t happened.

 

As **original creditor/DCA** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, OFT Collection Guidelines, *Subject Access request and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor/DCA** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **New DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If **New DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by clemma
found a better version of bemused letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

My heart is feeling a little lighter with your support !!

 

Even if my rep is not working on my file then at least now I feel I do have support THANK YOU

 

Anyone know if there is a place I can get a perminent assistant to help with my matters as now I am a neurology patient I can not cope with things myself as I don't understand anything anymore

 

Will send that letter see how I get on think they are really underhanded

 

Especially requesting my signature - might be slow now but knew that wasn't right

 

Thank You all advise welcome and NEEDED

 

Smiles One Stressed Woman

Link to post
Share on other sites

....and the letter you need:

 

Dear Sirs

Harassment by telephone

 

Account Number: XXXXXXX

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[NAME HERE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Pinky

Blood Problem little oxygen - after critical illness - no treatment available -

Leaves my husband to do everything poor man

 

Babies ? was always a clever girl now thick as 2 short planks lol

 

Yes many Babies 5 - Cope I can cope with them make me smile everyday but feel I am letting them down use to love racing them home everyday etc

 

Too young been like this for 6 years started at 33 - just when my life was coming together - nevermind have to start again. If I can get someone to deal with paperwork.

 

If debt is not enforcable what will happen to credit rating ?? Will charging order show on report ?

 

Will this affect future purchases e.g got rubbish mobile contract no reception anywhere would like to change provider. Settling for service that is far from realiable.

 

Smiles

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the event that they have not provided you with your CCA request, they are legal barred from enforcing the agreement at all - this would include the further addition of penalty charges, interest, requesting payment by mail or over the phone.

 

This has been confirmed to me by the Office Of Fair Trading, interestingly this was sent to me with relation to Citi Financial Europe Plc, Citi owning Egg there is a parallel here.

 

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/1-8.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/Image2.jpg

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c104/telso/Image3.jpg

 

What i'm going to suggest is that you contact the Office Of Fair Trading to make a complaint, outlining what has happened here, threatenning phone calls and so forth.

 

Additionally enquiring with your local trading standards as to whether they can assist you, this is a document that you are legally entitled to, in the absence of fulfilling their duty they hassled you for payment and instead chose to sell the account which I am pretty sure would be another act of enforcing the agreement.

 

Certainly there are grounds to request that the account be returned to the original creditor as there is a clear dispute - and Egg have not fulfilled their legal obligations.

 

Out of interest was this a credit card account?

 

Any further problems write to your MP to request his/her assistance. If you need help in finding the details of either your TS department, or your MP send me a PM.

 

Think that banks and debt collection companies are simply reliant on people not knowing their rights, as such i'm happy to assist you.

 

Hope this is of help.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Recieved this letter this morning - havent got scanner so I am coping it below

 

Pre Bankruptcy Petition

 

Your account has been reviewed by our head of litigation and due to a number of oppertunities you have been given to enter into a repayment program and clear your balance it has been decided that your acount is to be fast tracked to our bankrupcy division to consider filing a petition at a county court for your bankrupcy.

 

Bankrupcy is a very serious matter Being made bankrupt can have serious longterm implications.

 

If you were to be declared bunkrupt you may expect to:

 

have your situation advertised in the local press and the London Gazette for all to see.

 

Be required to fill in numerous forms and have an extended meeting with the offical reciever and if appointed a trustee in bankruptcy who will throughly investigate your affairs

 

Be prevented from running or controlling any businesses you currently own or being a director of a company for a time to be decided bythe courts or appropriate authorities

 

Lose any rights or benefits you may have to assests such as your home life insurances and any other property you own

 

Lose any rights or benefits to assets you may aquire during the term of your bankruptcy. Such as inheritences insurance settlements and increase in the value of your home.

 

Have your bankers creditors land lord etc immediatly informed

 

Have all bank accounts credit cards etc closed. Anything yo might leasing, or buying on Hire Purchase, such as your car maybe required by the owners to be immediatly returned to them.

 

You still have an option to avoid bankruptcy we will accept a realistic offer from you be it be a monthly repayment plan. Or an offer of full and final settlement. To make us an offer please call -------

 

If you are unsure about the contents of this or your rights we would suggest you seek advice from a solictor and we would also refer you to the website of the Department of trade and industry. www.insolvency.gov.uk/guidenceleaflets/guides.htm-1

 

Yours

 

Chief Operations OfficerGot Dates from my rep today detailed below:

 

28.02.09-Egg card services-account on hold letter

07.04.08-ARC Europe Limited-Chaser requested for signed Consumer Credit Agreement (‘CCA’) enclosing £1.00 fee

07.04.08-Egg Card Services-chaser for CCA and £1.00 statutory fee enclosed

16.04.08-ARC advised us that they are no longer dealing with this matter (incoming letter)

28.04.08-Egg Card Services-chaser for response

19.05.08-Egg card services-chaser for response

19.05.08-Egg card services-chaser for response

09.06.08-Egg banking-warning them of OFT guidelines that they should not contact client directly

 

HELP Fretting :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Citi who own Egg upto their old tricks, selling on accounts without providing a copy of the executed agreement.

 

I would definately complain to the Office Of Fair Trading, write to them outlining that a request was made to Egg for a copy of your executed agreement under s78(1) CCA but they never complied and subsequently sold the debt, now with regard to what Lowells are doing..... think they'll likely be next in line for a slap on the wrist from the OFT.

 

I'm gonna get some people who are knowledgeable about this kind of stuff on how to deal with Lowell - it maybe to request a copy of the CCA from them.

 

Its likely that this is just a threat-o-gram but considerring its content its probably best to wait and here what others say about how to respond.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells sent petition / don't think I've had default notice ??

 

CCA requested in first com. 28-02-08

 

Sent letter today as was waiting for dates from rep.

 

Should I email copy to them now

 

Also questioned the fact that they say I could lose my benefit thought this was protected - and can't afford them to touch my life insurance because no one will give me insurance not even for 20 years

 

Can't believe or cope with This

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you won't lose any 'State Benefits', you've misunderstood.

 

As you have only sent the letter today Lowells are doing their usual trick of threatening and harassing people. Please don't worry they cannot carry out any of their threats because the account is in dispute and they wouldn't dare go anywhere near a court.

 

Just give it a few days for them to receive your letter & see how they respond. As I said, please do not worry because we can easily sort them out;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pre Bankruptcy Petition.???????

 

This letter as far as I can make out has no legal standing whatsoever. Its just another scary letter from the Leeds Losers to try to scare you into ringing their telephone threat monkeys, hence all their warnings of what COULD happen IF they successfully obtained a Bankruptcy Petition.

 

Before they could even present a bankruptcy petition they would need to properly serve you with a Statutory Demand. Should they do this it will be an easy matter to get it Set Aside by virtue of the alleged debt being in serious dispute.

 

What you really need to do now is make a formal complaint to the OFT about the behaviour of the Leeds Losers.

 

Do not lose any sleep over these people. You will get all the help you need to beat them. They are nothing if not predictable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thamk you SOoooooooooooo. Much

 

Mellowing out now a little not fair they can send these type of letters being disabled cardiac patient effects my health big time !!!

 

What on earth would I have done if I hadn't found this website

 

As i've said before Your Angels :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...