Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council tax debt forcing bankcruptcy any advice???


selinajayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i recieved a letter today from the council saying my debt had been passed over to solicitors for bankruptcy.

I have been claiming income support for the last 2 years and was suppose to e getting council tax benefit but somewhere along the line the claim has been cocked up.

At the begining of my claim they made a mistake and thought i was not getting income support any more so they stopped the council tax claim. i informed them i was still getting income support and thought the council tax claim was carried on but apparently it wasnt and now they have handed it over to soliciotrs.

can anyone give me any advice on this as i really dont want to be declared as bankcrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i think the debt is for 3 years but i have been on income support for 2 years. when i first went on income support they made me pay £11 a month to pay off the arrears i already owed but then they thought i stopped my income support clain so they stopped the council tax claim. i still dont know if they are paying the council tax now apparently its been handed over to the right people at the council but it is also in the hands of the solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but the level of debt? i.e amount? As in if it is relatively small amount it is not cost effective to make you bankrupt as that in itself costs a fair chunk of money.

 

Do you own your own home/have realisable assets?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt they'll go for bankruptcy at this stage of the game but if they do there is a process to be followed such as a statutory demand etc etc. If in the unlikely event that they do you should come back here for help.

 

On the letter they sent where they mentioned bankruptcy what did it say? as in was it 'me're passing this on to our solicitors who 'may' issue bankruptcy proceedings against you'

 

Also, you say 'we' is there an income in the house other than benefits that the council may have known about and which would disqualify you from council tax benefit?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my husbands off sick and claims income support for the both of us. we have a young baby that he cant care for so thats why i cant work. the letter says they have handed it over to soilicitors to file for bankcruptcy. the thing is they thought we werent on any benefits so have said we owe the full amount but we were on benefits so obviously dont owe that amount

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't make any submissions on the debt owed but it sounds like something has gone awry between yourself and the council but....

 

Did not the council tell you how much the debt was that was owed to them when they wrote saying it was being handed over to solicitors?

 

At the same time as this you say you were paying them £11 a month on arrears which at least 1 years was prior to any claim you made for council tax benefit? when did you stop paying them the arrears? Why did you stop paying them? Was there a specific reason? Is this what they are handing over to solicitors?

 

At the same time as this I would of thought the council would have written to you over the last couple of years reminding you of your obligation to pay your council tax? They'e usually pretty quick off the mark when it comes to money owed to them and at about this time every year they send out new council tax bills for April to April, did you not get one last year as this would have shown your alleged arrears? If you were on council tax benefit it would show on your annual statementsbut would also include any areears you may owe and probably when you owed it from/to

 

If you are on benefits that qualify you for council tax relief and your situation hasn't changed since making the initial claim then I see no reason why the council cannot pull your file to help establsih this, if however you came off their radar for a while because of the claim lapsing or changing then there may be some work for you to do to establish just how/when the changes occured etc etc.

 

You're a bit hazy on details, you really should know a little more than you currently do. First port of call would be to the council to establish the details and go from there, In the first instance I would phone them with a view to going to see them and at the same time as this would write to them by recorded delivery asking them to claify the issue and go from there.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

march 2008 i owed quite alot and had no payment plan, in april 2008 my husband and i went on to jobseekers allowance and started to claim council tax benefit and the council made arrangements for us to pay £11 a month to start paying off our arrears. In june 2008 we changed to income support and the council stopped our claim because we came off jobseekers. They asked for proof that we were now on income support which i sent. In novemebr 2008 we recieved a letter from them saying we owed council tax and they knew nothing about us being on income supprt. we then heard nothing until june 2009 saying we owed all the money and they knew nothing about us being on income support. they asked for proof and a list of all our outgoings which i provided.we heard nothing untill the other day saying they had just "found" our letter with proof of everything and it has now been handed over to the right people in the benefits office but it has also already been handed over to the solicitors for a bankruptcy order and tells me i should call the solicitors. it doesnt say how much the amount is but im assuming it must be about £3000

Link to post
Share on other sites

i called the solicitors and council yeaterday. solicitors cant help or tell me anything untill we recieve the hand given letter from them and the council can only tell me how much i owe. i told them i thought i was recieving council tax benefit and it turned out im not. i also told them i had sent e mails and they told me it had gone to the wrong dept so should they have not forwarded it to the right dept or at least told me i had done it wrong in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have recieved the statory demand and replied to it. i ahve also filled in another council tax benefit claim form and asked for it to be backdated. i got a letter back from them saying they could not back date it as it was my fault i wasnt claiming.

im worried sick i dont want to loose the house and i dont understand how its my fault. i have always filled in any forms sent to me and sent off any proof of benefits but they are saying i havent, why on earth would i say i did if i didnt

Link to post
Share on other sites

please help we thought we were recieving council tax benefit but it turns out we werent. the council have now passed it over to solicitors who have served a statory demand.

we are really worried and dont want to loose the house

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't lose your house hunni.

It may pay you to ask to see a member of your councils revenues division to discuss the matter - if you haven't done so already!

Have you had any correspondence in the past that led you to believe you were in receipt of Council Tax Benefit? Do you claim Housing Benefit at all?

Best wishes.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we own our house so cant claim housing benefit but we do get housing costs in our income support payments.

we were getting council tax benefit but we changed from jobseekers to income support. the council stopped the benefit because they thought hubby had gone back to work, i called them and said we were now on income support and sent the proof they required.

apparently they never recieved it, they sent a letter a few months later and i again replied with 2 emails and said i thought we were on council tax benefit. it wasnt till a year later before they sent me another letter and form which i filled out and sent off, that was in june last year and they are saying they have only just recieved it through a third party (whatever that means) then last week we got the statory demand for insolvency.

i have filled in another council tax benefit form and personally returned it asking for it to be back dated but yesterday got a letter to say they wouldnt back date it as it was my fault

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, you need far more professional assistance than I can give. I would gather up all the paperwork you have that supports what you say and make an appointment with CAB or some other Welfare Rights people depending on your area.

I'd also draft out a letter highlighting what you say has happened and send both the Head of Revenues and whoever the solicitor is a copy.

I would also - if you haven't already - just pop my head round the door of the forum listings as I'm sure there is a forum on site advising about insolvency.

Good luck and best wishes.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks hun

i have written a letter to solicitors with all the information and proof i have of everything and have appointment with cab on the 11th so hopefully i will get somewhere. its all such a worry

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

we have a huge council tax bill because of a cock up. I say its the councils fault they say its my fault.

So as a result i'm left with a huge bill and they are going to file for bankcruptcy if i dont come up with a reasonable payment plan.

I have offered £10 a week as we are on income support at the moment because i have an injury due to a failed operation.

The council have said they are expecting payments of £500 a month!!!!!

If we cant pay that, which obviously we cant, then they will file for bankcruptcy which will mean we have to sell the house.

Any advice would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be easier if you kept to the one thread about your Council Tax problems rather than starting two.

 

Coniff - the problem is around CTB. They were on this but it stopped when there was a changeover from one benefit to another but OP did not know this. Seems as if the Council was informed that one had stopped but not that another one had started so they stopped the claim as they thought her partner was now working. Then there was info not received, etc so it was not restarted.

 

SelinaJayne - Your last post on the other thread stated you had an appointment booked with the CAB. How did that go? What advice did they give you? You were also advised to get legal advice if possible. Did you do that? I really think that you need some professional help on this since they are threatening bankruptcy.

 

It would also be good to know a bit more about the contact you had with the Council (both the Benefit and Council Tax) depts and vice versa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So from reading, this would appear to be the councils fault for assuming something without knowing. I don't think they would like it if I paid £500 because I 'assumed' that it had been cut in half.

 

Bankruptcy isn't a cut and dry thing, if you go to the hearing, the judge will look at all things and if it can be shown that the current tax and something off the arrears can be maintained, then he would be very unlikely to grant it and the council will have wasted more that £1,000 of taxpayers money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...