Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoping someone can help me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5056 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ahh i c...yeah they'll be more on banks and debt agency side.

 

I bet all the FOS will tell me the same info. Just out of interest are there any forum members on here that are or were in my situation? If so, what sort of outcome did they have? Any links?

 

thanks very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

* * * * UPDATE * * * *

 

hi guys,

 

just got a call from the ombudsman today who seems to have come to a conclusion:-

 

Mackenzie are offering to stop chasing me and will pass my debt back to the original debt owner - 1ST CREDIT. He says that since my complaint is against Mackenzie, that if i accept this offer then it'll go back to 1st credit and if they continue to chase me then i'll have to make another complaint again. I said to him that i'm disappointed as this isn't solving the problem, but is simply kind of "pass-the-parcel" game to the debt companies, i.e. 1st credit can then pass the debt to another debt company etc. He says to me to think about it and to let him know ASAP.

 

I'm gonna phone National Debtline tomorrow, but would also like your advice on what to do please.

 

thanks guys...much appreciate your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mackenzie are offering to stop chasing me and will pass my debt back to the original debt owner - 1st credit
Because they know you have them by the danglies. ;)

 

MH are the bottom of the DCA foodchain, a debt can't go much further after it reaches them. There's every likelihood that if they pass it back to 1st crudites that'll be the end of it. No doubt MH will give a report to them as to why they're passing it back. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So i guess i should accept it, right? :)

 

2. Also should i ask for everything in writing before acceptence?

 

3. Lastly should i safely call this the end of my debt problems? or can i still get letters about this debt?? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So i guess i should accept it, right?
Obviously only you can make that decision, but I would myself.
2. Also should i ask for everything in writing before acceptence?
They usually send you a letter anyway.
3. Lastly should i safely call this the end of my debt problems? or can i still get letters about this debt??
I doubt whether they will continue, but if they do report them to the OFT this time because they are in breach of their guidelines.
Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm getting slightly different opinions as i've also posted these questions on Moneysavingexperts (this forum recommended your brilliant CAG website). According to a user on there, i could still be chased as my complaint is not against 1st Credit, so they can carry on.

 

I'm off 2 sleep, but i will b online again tomorrow morning.

 

take care and thank u for helping me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good morning,

 

thanks for that info cerber. The ombudsman i spoke to yesterday seems to think that 1st credit can still pass on the debt or continue to chase me, even if MH are passing the debt back to them. This is why i was disappointed as that doesn't solve the problem, but merely passes the problem to someone else.

 

But i did mention one thing - that it was 1st Credit who originally got the SB letter and after that was when MH took over, so they kind of already had their warning that this debt is SB, so if 1st credit start sending me letters, then i'm sure i can remind them that they never replied to my original letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just spoken to NDL. They also have said that it show MH have no proof that the debt is not SB and that most likely even if the debt is going to be passed back to 1st Credit, they will most likely not bother chasing the debt.

 

I'm thinking to contact the ombudsman and:-

 

1. tell him that MH wrote to me saying that they will investigate and forward some proof that the debt is not SB, so i would like to know the outcome of their so-called "investigation".

 

2. ask him to tell MH to remove my data from their system.

3. get him to give me their full offer in writing.

 

What do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

Unfortunatly this will now get passed around the various DCA's and ain't nothing you can do about that.

However each time it passes on and you get the letter saying You owe us Blah blah blah you send the S/Barred letter. If they still bug you then send the idiots this

Courtesy of ScarletPimpernel......... ...

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter dated (date). I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any firm you claim to represent. All communication in this matter must be in writing.

 

The alleged debt is statute barredlink3.gif under the Limitation Act 1980. Take notice that no funds will be forthcoming.

 

You are reminded that the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif considers it an Unfair practicelink3.gif to pursue a statute-barred debt when it has been made clear that no payment will be made.

 

I do not expect to hear from you again, and no further correspondence will be entered into.

 

Your etc.

 

Don't forget to send any letters recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that as Muck Hall have offered to return it to Worst Credit, I would let it.

If any other idiot tries it on (including 1st Crud) report them to Trading Standards.

 

You have stated your position, they have to drop it or prove it's not SB. You could report them to the CSA as well but they are the credit industries buddy boy club

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoken to the ombudsman. I tried to push him to deal with 1st credit too as i told him that 1st credit is already mentioned in the complaint. He said that when i filled the form, i only wrote the address of MH as the business i want to complain about and in order to deal with a second business, i needed to use another form.

 

Again he finalised by saying that MH offer is that they will no longer pursue me and that the debt will be passed back to 1st Credit. He said that if 1st Credit then send me more letters, then i need to make a complain about them too. He said that the complain can be fast tracked to him, so it'll get dealt with a lot quicker (although i'm not sure if i'd want to use him again).

 

He lastly said that he's aware that the complaint isn't fully solved, but at least MH can now never come back and 1st Credit are the owners of the debt and only they can write the debt off. He said that I maybe better off writing a letter to them and asking them for a response of my original SB letter. What do u think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Your right PGH7447,

 

I can now slightly relax, knowing that they may have run out of options to pursue the debt. I'm going to let you know when i receive a written letter explaining the offer and hopefully you guys can guide me. ;)

 

Thank you so much for all your help which is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello again everyone,

 

hope you had a good weekend. I've just received the ombudsman letter and would like to run everything past you guys, before i send a reply back.

 

Here are the two pages of the letter:-

 

PAGE 1

p1010425detailsremoved.jpg

 

 

 

PAGE 2

p1010427detailsremoved.jpg

 

 

Please could you let me know ASAP what you guys think and what you recommend i do.

 

I eagerly look forward to your replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not offering, but the FOS adjudicator is kind of backing me into a corner. If you read from the previous posts, he's saying that the debt is not SB if i've deliberately ran away from the debt companies.

 

I tried my best to tell him that he needs to get them to prove it that the debt is SB, but he is not listening and insists that MH can't prove it as they are simply trying to "collect the debt" for 1st credit, who are the original owners.

 

Therefore this is the offer MH have made that they will stop pursuing me for this debt.

 

What should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the FOS adjudicator says that is not possible.

 

The excuse that MH have presented to the adjudicator is that the debt is not owned by them and that 1st credit have simply told MH to collect the debt on their behalf.

 

The adjudicator has said that for this reason, MH have said they can't prove if the debt is SB or not and can't write off the debt as only 1st credit who are the owners can do this and this is why the debt has to be passed back to 1st credit.

 

I'm beginning to smell something fishy too and most likely I may get 1st credit chasing me instead now, although i did send a SB letter to 1st Credit too.

 

I don't know what to do...what do you recommend?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again guys,

 

After your advice, I have just spoken to National Debtline. They have said that since MH have agreed to close my a/c and pass the debt back to 1st Credit, then they believe this is a very successful outcome for me.

 

But now what NDL recommend is that I write back to 1st Credit and "in my own words" ask them why they ignored my SB letter and forwarded the debt to MH and also to tell them that I demand a reply ASAP regarding proving my Statute Barred status etc etc.

 

The reason they say that i should write is because there is a good chance 1st credit will then pass it to a 3rd party, so i should try to stop them before they do this.

 

What sort of a letter should i write and is this pushing my luck too far?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...