Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

paying token payments on unenforceable loan - what course of action?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5118 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My OH took out a loan of £8,000 with a major bank early 2004. He made regular payments every month. In October [whilst he was not working] he requested a top up on the 1st loan of another £4,000 - this was done over the phone. He was totally honest and explained to the bank person that he was currently unemployed but that he was expecting to start a new job in a week or 2. He was told that was fine and the money was in our bank account within a day or so.

 

After a couple of years [sorry not exactly sure of the time scale] he was once again made redundant and claiming JSA, this meant he could no longer afford the repayments so the account went into arrears. A while later a DCA began phoning badgering him for payments. I think they were acting on behalf of the bank as we've never a NA or anything to suggest the debt was sold. Amazingly they agreed to accept £10 a month and this has been paid regularly each month without fail.

 

He also had a credit card with the same lender but the balance of this was paid in full in 2003 well before the loan [and top-up] was taken out.

 

 

So...

  • Does the fact it was 7 years ago stop him claiming the charges back on the CC?

There was PPI on the loan, on the CCA [which we have - the actual original] it shows as a separate figure of almost £5,000 for the PPI- I'm not sure if this sum would be the total PPI that would have been paid by the time the loan was all paid for or something else, as when this figure is added to the amount borrowed, they equal the 'total amount' but there's no mention of the total repayable i.e. nowhere does it say how much it would be with interest added - only a percentage rate for the interest.

 

As I said above, we have the original CCA, for the initial loan and the top-up. I have run both of them through the 'checker software' on a website that allows you to check your loan agreement - I can't vouch for the site's authenticity - BUT..... on the initial CCA it found 5 breaches, on the top-up 7!! So it looks like we have a case to class it as an unenforceable debt!:-o

 

 

 

What should I do now?

  • Try to reclaim any charges on the credit card/PPI on the loan?
  • Send them a SAR?
  • Is there a case of any misconduct on the bank's behalf for topping the loan up while OH was not working - and after he told them as much? And could it be written off for that reason?
  • Use the fact that their CCA is unenforceable and offer a full & final?

I'm really not sure what should be the next move, so your advice, oh wise caggers!;)

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually sent a CCA Request to either OC or DCA?

 

It does not matter that you have the original, file it away and 'forget' about it, they are required by law to send you a copy of an original that may or may not be in their possession. This should be send to whoever is dealing with the account now, probably a DCA.

 

When this is received you can remove all personal and identifying details and post on here for the experts to give opinion as to its' enforceability.

 

You can send the SAR to OC in which they should include a copy of the Agreement together with the other information you require with regards to the PPI.

 

CCA allows 12 + 2 days for them to send and then the account is in dispute until they do.

 

SAR takes 40 days.

 

Other questions will be answered by people with more experience than I on PPI etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying harrassed, no, no CCA request has been sent. Our concern is that sending the CCA request and or SAR might result in them [DCA or OC] to re-examine the situation and decide to take some further action i.e. try to increase monthly payments or take court action, thus opening a can of worms we'd rather rather stayed closed.

 

Also wouldn't it be preferable to try to claim back any charges that were incurred on the credit card first as wouldn't that be harder to do once we start shouting 'unenforceable' at them regarding the loan?

 

Is there any way of getting the original CCA's that we have checked for enforceability - before we do anything, at least then we have a 'safety net' so to speak?

 

Have you actually sent a CCA Request to either OC or DCA?.

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't you make a claim under the PPI? It sounds as though you had a perfectly good case.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No scanner, but I've photographed them [one's only a photocopy so it's not great quality] I'll post a link once I've taken all personal details out.

 

Scan them and post them up removing personal details

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

We fully intend to. It's just a case of doing things in the right order so as not to jeopardise ourselves with the token payments in the mean time.

 

Why didn't you make a claim under the PPI? It sounds as though you had a perfectly good case.

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If we manage to claim the PPI back, I'm guessing they'll deduct it from the outstanding balance that's owed them, rather than refund us?

 

Why didn't you make a claim under the PPI? It sounds as though you had a perfectly good case.

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we manage to claim the PPI back, I'm guessing they'll deduct it from the outstanding balance that's owed them, rather than refund us?

 

:confused:Why didn't you use the PPI you had in place to make the monthly payments whilst your other half was out of work after being made redundant?

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rather sickeningly, we only discovered recently [when finding some old loan related paperwork] that he HAD cover, they [the lender] never even suggested he claimed on the PPI when he explained the reason he couldn't make the monthly payments! But hey, I'm sure they wouldv'e found some way of wriggling out of paying anyway!

 

:confused:Why didn't you use the PPI you had in place to make the monthly payments whilst your other half was out of work after being made redundant?

"Someday a real rain will come and wash all this **** off the streets" - Travis Bickle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...