Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Djokovic is back in the news - the BBC has cast doubts on the date of his covid test prior to arriving in Australia. They've done some clever research with serial numbers and QR codes but the Serbian public health authority isn't giving information.   And Nadal is a step closer to his 21st Grand Slam title, which would make him the first male player to reach that. He won't be able to compete in the French Open under France's current rules which require all sportspeople to be vaxxed.   Novak Djokovic: Doubts over timing of Covid test WWW.BBC.COM The BBC has uncovered fresh evidence questioning the timing of Novak Djokovic’s positive Covid test used to enter Australia.  
    • Hi   I could be wrong here so could @namedisplay please clarify if I am correct or completely wrong?   In your post#1 you mention that due to your health issues and your mental state at the time you rang the Training Room and was told it would cost and initial £200 and then £15 per month until you finished the course.   Then further in post#1 The Training Room told you you were not eligible for an extension because you hadn't completed enough of the course.   With the above I now refer Post#12 which mentions your circumstances are covered by 13 in the TTR Terms and Conditions.   What is mentioned above seems conflicting from TTR for the following:   1. IMO that money of £200 and then £15 per month (on top of original Course Fees) was them at that time agreeing to an extension as per 13 in TTR Terms and Conditions   2. Them stating you can't extend Course as not completed enough of Course is not in TTR Terms and Conditions (that I and others can see) (Note they could be referring to 15 in TTR Terms and Conditions)   Can you clarify the above and were you informed those extra costs were due to an extension of your Course.   Again I will ask did you provide the Training Room with Medical Evidence when you asked the above?   We also still need to see the Letter from Training Room Threatening Legal Action (fully redacted) which you still haven't posted?   You need to send The Training Room a Subject Access Request (SAR) asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase means whatever format they hold that data in whether it be written, email, recorded phone calls etc.   They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond to your SAR Request and that Time Limit only starts once they have acknowledged your SAR Request. They can extend that Time Limit if they need to prove identity before actioning the SAR Request so be aware of that.   A SAR Request is now FREE and make sure you get Free Proof of Posting from the Post Office     Your right of access ICO.ORG.UK   Can you please make sure you answer the questions asked of Caggers to assist you    
    • I've been trying to resolve a issue with 8 PCN issued by Tyne Tunnel 2 (tt2.co.uk). Tyne Tunnel 2 is a gated toll charged tunnel to cross the River Tyne in Newcastle. We moved in recently so all a bit new to us. My dad had been using the tunnel about twice a week and he had been paying cash for the toll fee at the booths. At some point in November 2021 they had done some constructions where the gates had been closed and payments had transitioned to online methods. My dad had been oblivious to this and been on his merry way multiple times thinking that he doesn't need to pay. So he received the first PCN some where end of November which had been issue on the 26th after which point I went on alert and sorted out the online accounts and such. However the current total of fines has amounted to £255.20 and I have appealed explaining that soon as the letters were received we have resolved the issue but they insist on us paying 8 PCN. I feel it's unfair that the fine is for the same offence which we couldn't have rectified or known until we received the first PCN letter and after the first PCN we have rectified it so feel they are being bit draconic. Any advice on this matter? 
    • No need to apologise! I am extremely grateful for both your help   Gosh very good attention to detail going on here   Great thank you, i will put them back as below   Good evening to you   DEFENCE   1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.     2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement/account number within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.   3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.      4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.   5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.   6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.    Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears, d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.   9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.   10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Sainsbury CCJ - old credit card debt - need to set aside.


Axiom99
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Agreement101.jpgAgreement101.jpglink to the agreements.... ( 4 further pages of the first agreement and all 8 pages of the 2nd agreement)

 

Agreement101.jpgAgreement101.jpgAXIOM pictures by hunni2006_photos - Photobucket

 

and below is the defence....

 

 

 

 

was there any explanation as to why you got 2 agreements in response to your CCA request?Agreement103.jpgAgreement101.jpg

 

Hunni,

Thanks again for taking the trouble to post the documents :D.Don't know why there were two separate agreements sent in response to the 77/78 request its a bit of a mystery.

Any thoughts on the defence allegedly sent to court by the solicitor or on the timescale to respond issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, that looks more like terms and conditions to me. I would suggest they have probably sent a set that they claim to have been from inception and a current set.

 

You would need to see if there is any date code or it means checking all the clauses to see if there were any changes made from one set to the other.

 

As Caro has already pointed out, there doesnt appear to be anywhere for you or them to sign. Usually an agreement / application would be one A4 page maybe doublesided with your personal details on one part, and the prescribed terms. There would be space for both you and them to sign. There would also be a declaration in respect of the Data Protection Act. All of that appears to be missing, so it would seem to me all you have is a set of terms and conditions.

 

So, your plan is to have the default judgement set aside yes ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well originally my solicitor allegedly submitted a defence to the claim but it appears not to have arrived at the court so a judgement in default was issued.

The solicitor then said they would apply to have the judgement set aside but after chasing them for months all of a sudden they wanted 500 quid plus VAT to do this which is how I ended up on this thread having concluded I might as well try to apply for set aside myself.

I was then advised to post up agreements here so people could advise if I had a defence to offer and thats where I am now.

I was advis

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am concerned that enforcement action will be taken by the lender soon,can anyone please help with opinions about the agreement I have posted and the defence which was prepared by the solicitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the documents supplied, the court have enforced the agreement so your first priority must be to apply to set that aside, and the sooner the better. What did the court order say?

 

I think you normally have 7 days to apply for a set aside, so the longer you leave it, the harder it will be to justify not dealing with it sooner.

 

Apply on an N244 using the grounds that your solicitor led you to believe that a defence had been filed, but the court had not received it, and that you believe that the CCA should not be enforced.

 

You need to make up your mind if you're going to deal with this yourself or with the solicitor.

 

Once the judgement is set aside, you will be able to put in a defence, and can decide what you want to use.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro,the default judgement was received in January and I have been trying to get the solicitor to act since then with no result so I guess I have no choice but to either pay him 500 quid( and given his performance so far that seems like a waste of money) or deal with it myself which is what I will do.

 

I can show the court many many emails between the solicitor and myself to back up my assertion that my solicitor has let me down and I acted in good faith so hopefully that will be enough for the court.

 

I would appreciate if someone could please clarify the points about completing the form which I raised in post number 3.

Also I have been told that when attending the court to apply for the set aside the court will probably ask what grounds I have for believing there is a valid reason for the set aside to be granted,ie the argument that I believed a defence had been submitted by my solicitor is not sufficient and I will need to convince them that I had a valid defence which had at least a realistic possibility of success in the first place.

 

I guess this is to stop people issuing spurious set aside applications to drag things out even when they do not have a cogent argument to present which will be seen as a waste of the courts time.

 

The only thing I have at the moment is the defence prepared by the solicitor posted up earlier so I will have to go with that unless anyone has any opinions.

 

Having checked out some other threads it occurred to me that I have never actually had a copy of the CCA sent to me and that according to what I have read theere should have been a copy sent with the claim and a copy of the default notice as they refer to it in the claim.

Can I therefore offer an embarassed defence as such:

 

1. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form or sent to me as laid out in Practice Direction 16. Paragraph 7.3.

Any thoughts?

 

Having checked out some other threads it occurred to me that I have never actually had a copy of the CCA sent to me and that according to what I have read theere should have been a copy sent with the claim and a copy of the default notice as they refer to it in the claim.

Can I therefore offer an embarassed defence as such:

 

1. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form or sent to me as laid out in Practice Direction 16. Paragraph 7.3.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Can anyone please help me to progress this situation or failing that advise where/how I can obtain further help,

Thanks

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Axiom99 said:

 

3.What order are you asking the court to make and why? I am seeking Summary Judgement ordered on xx January 2010 to be set aside as the defence submitted by my solicitor was not received by the court.

 

4.Have you attached a draft of the order you are applting for?

You could put something along the lines of:-

a The defendant requests that the summary judgement given on xx January 2010 is struck out.

b The claimant provides the following documents within 14 days.

(list all documents you need that they refer to, any docs you need to form your defence, and exactly how they've arrived at the figure claimed).

 

c The defendant is permitted to file an amended defence within 21 days after receiving the above documents.

d That the claim is allocated to the small claims track (assuming it's under £5k).

etc

 

5.Presumably I should ask for this to be dealt with at a hearing

 

Ideally the set aside could be dealt with without a hearing which will make your application cheaper. If the court feel it's necessary they will order it.

 

6.How long will the hearing last? Leave blank

 

 

7.

Give details of any fixed trial date or period Leave blank

8.

What level of Judge does your hearing need? Leave blank

9.

Who should be served with this applicatio

The claimant

 

 

 

10.

What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

the attached witness statement

the statement of case

the evidence set out in the box below

 

 

I guess the statement of case is 'my solicitor cocked it up' and the evidence would be a print out of all the emails I have mentioned.

 

Cheers :)

 

You could send the application to Sainsbury's solicitors along with a covering letter explaining the lost defence from your own solicitor, and ask them to agree to the set aside, which would mean you wouldn't need a fee.

 

If they don't agree you can still apply to the court, but will need to pay.

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the help and the suggestion of writing to Sainsbury's solicitors but I am concerned about more delays as the judgement was nearly 3 months ago and the case has been passed to my local court for enforcement.

I am worried that I will run out of time to apply for the set aside and also that Sainsburys will apply for a charging order or similar before I egt the judgement set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Help!kicking myself for prevaricating now but have had lot of other problems going on and have not submitted N244 yet(solicitors did say they would deal with this but have not done so predictably!)

I have now received Interim Charging order dated 7.05.2010 and the date for application to be heard is 16.06.2010.

I hope I am not too late to still apply for set aside,can anyone please help with advice as to what to do next?

 

Can any one please help with my question above ,starting to get very worried now about what to do next with this charging order situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have flagged your post for attention of the site team.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

COs are not my thing but, if you are going to make an application, do it ASAP.

Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What's Best for You?

 

 

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

 

Alliance & Leicester Moneyclaim issued 20/1/07 £225.50 full settlement received 29 January 2007

Smile £1,075.50 + interest Email request for payment 24/5/06 received £1,000.50 14/7/06 + £20 30/7/06

Yorkshire Bank Moneyclaim issued 21/6/06 £4,489.39 full settlement received 26 January 2007

:p

 

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will move this to legal issues.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the move I presume this is a more appropriate place for this problem :D

 

Most caggers lurk around the forums they are best able to help in. Those with legal knowledge, or experience are more likely to be found in the legal issues forums.. so yes, where a claim has been issued or situations such as you find yourself it.. the legal forums will be a more appropriate place.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Sainsbury CCJ - old credit card debt - need to set aside.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...