Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sainsbury CCJ - old credit card debt - need to set aside.


Axiom99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5094 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Agreement101.jpgAgreement101.jpglink to the agreements.... ( 4 further pages of the first agreement and all 8 pages of the 2nd agreement)

 

Agreement101.jpgAgreement101.jpgAXIOM pictures by hunni2006_photos - Photobucket

 

and below is the defence....

 

 

 

 

was there any explanation as to why you got 2 agreements in response to your CCA request?Agreement103.jpgAgreement101.jpg

 

Hunni,

Thanks again for taking the trouble to post the documents :D.Don't know why there were two separate agreements sent in response to the 77/78 request its a bit of a mystery.

Any thoughts on the defence allegedly sent to court by the solicitor or on the timescale to respond issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, that looks more like terms and conditions to me. I would suggest they have probably sent a set that they claim to have been from inception and a current set.

 

You would need to see if there is any date code or it means checking all the clauses to see if there were any changes made from one set to the other.

 

As Caro has already pointed out, there doesnt appear to be anywhere for you or them to sign. Usually an agreement / application would be one A4 page maybe doublesided with your personal details on one part, and the prescribed terms. There would be space for both you and them to sign. There would also be a declaration in respect of the Data Protection Act. All of that appears to be missing, so it would seem to me all you have is a set of terms and conditions.

 

So, your plan is to have the default judgement set aside yes ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well originally my solicitor allegedly submitted a defence to the claim but it appears not to have arrived at the court so a judgement in default was issued.

The solicitor then said they would apply to have the judgement set aside but after chasing them for months all of a sudden they wanted 500 quid plus VAT to do this which is how I ended up on this thread having concluded I might as well try to apply for set aside myself.

I was then advised to post up agreements here so people could advise if I had a defence to offer and thats where I am now.

I was advis

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am concerned that enforcement action will be taken by the lender soon,can anyone please help with opinions about the agreement I have posted and the defence which was prepared by the solicitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the documents supplied, the court have enforced the agreement so your first priority must be to apply to set that aside, and the sooner the better. What did the court order say?

 

I think you normally have 7 days to apply for a set aside, so the longer you leave it, the harder it will be to justify not dealing with it sooner.

 

Apply on an N244 using the grounds that your solicitor led you to believe that a defence had been filed, but the court had not received it, and that you believe that the CCA should not be enforced.

 

You need to make up your mind if you're going to deal with this yourself or with the solicitor.

 

Once the judgement is set aside, you will be able to put in a defence, and can decide what you want to use.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro,the default judgement was received in January and I have been trying to get the solicitor to act since then with no result so I guess I have no choice but to either pay him 500 quid( and given his performance so far that seems like a waste of money) or deal with it myself which is what I will do.

 

I can show the court many many emails between the solicitor and myself to back up my assertion that my solicitor has let me down and I acted in good faith so hopefully that will be enough for the court.

 

I would appreciate if someone could please clarify the points about completing the form which I raised in post number 3.

Also I have been told that when attending the court to apply for the set aside the court will probably ask what grounds I have for believing there is a valid reason for the set aside to be granted,ie the argument that I believed a defence had been submitted by my solicitor is not sufficient and I will need to convince them that I had a valid defence which had at least a realistic possibility of success in the first place.

 

I guess this is to stop people issuing spurious set aside applications to drag things out even when they do not have a cogent argument to present which will be seen as a waste of the courts time.

 

The only thing I have at the moment is the defence prepared by the solicitor posted up earlier so I will have to go with that unless anyone has any opinions.

 

Having checked out some other threads it occurred to me that I have never actually had a copy of the CCA sent to me and that according to what I have read theere should have been a copy sent with the claim and a copy of the default notice as they refer to it in the claim.

Can I therefore offer an embarassed defence as such:

 

1. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form or sent to me as laid out in Practice Direction 16. Paragraph 7.3.

Any thoughts?

 

Having checked out some other threads it occurred to me that I have never actually had a copy of the CCA sent to me and that according to what I have read theere should have been a copy sent with the claim and a copy of the default notice as they refer to it in the claim.

Can I therefore offer an embarassed defence as such:

 

1. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form or sent to me as laid out in Practice Direction 16. Paragraph 7.3.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Can anyone please help me to progress this situation or failing that advise where/how I can obtain further help,

Thanks

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Axiom99 said:

 

3.What order are you asking the court to make and why? I am seeking Summary Judgement ordered on xx January 2010 to be set aside as the defence submitted by my solicitor was not received by the court.

 

4.Have you attached a draft of the order you are applting for?

You could put something along the lines of:-

a The defendant requests that the summary judgement given on xx January 2010 is struck out.

b The claimant provides the following documents within 14 days.

(list all documents you need that they refer to, any docs you need to form your defence, and exactly how they've arrived at the figure claimed).

 

c The defendant is permitted to file an amended defence within 21 days after receiving the above documents.

d That the claim is allocated to the small claims track (assuming it's under £5k).

etc

 

5.Presumably I should ask for this to be dealt with at a hearing

 

Ideally the set aside could be dealt with without a hearing which will make your application cheaper. If the court feel it's necessary they will order it.

 

6.How long will the hearing last? Leave blank

 

 

7.

Give details of any fixed trial date or period Leave blank

8.

What level of Judge does your hearing need? Leave blank

9.

Who should be served with this applicatio

The claimant

 

 

 

10.

What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

the attached witness statement

the statement of case

the evidence set out in the box below

 

 

I guess the statement of case is 'my solicitor cocked it up' and the evidence would be a print out of all the emails I have mentioned.

 

Cheers :)

 

You could send the application to Sainsbury's solicitors along with a covering letter explaining the lost defence from your own solicitor, and ask them to agree to the set aside, which would mean you wouldn't need a fee.

 

If they don't agree you can still apply to the court, but will need to pay.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the help and the suggestion of writing to Sainsbury's solicitors but I am concerned about more delays as the judgement was nearly 3 months ago and the case has been passed to my local court for enforcement.

I am worried that I will run out of time to apply for the set aside and also that Sainsburys will apply for a charging order or similar before I egt the judgement set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Help!kicking myself for prevaricating now but have had lot of other problems going on and have not submitted N244 yet(solicitors did say they would deal with this but have not done so predictably!)

I have now received Interim Charging order dated 7.05.2010 and the date for application to be heard is 16.06.2010.

I hope I am not too late to still apply for set aside,can anyone please help with advice as to what to do next?

 

Can any one please help with my question above ,starting to get very worried now about what to do next with this charging order situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have flagged your post for attention of the site team.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will move this to legal issues.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the move I presume this is a more appropriate place for this problem :D

 

Most caggers lurk around the forums they are best able to help in. Those with legal knowledge, or experience are more likely to be found in the legal issues forums.. so yes, where a claim has been issued or situations such as you find yourself it.. the legal forums will be a more appropriate place.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Sainsbury CCJ - old credit card debt - need to set aside.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...