Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hey have filed a defence at 4pm today the day before I could request a judgement.  I thought it was last Friday but it was infact tomorrow they would have ran out of time 
    • Hello All,   My query is about the Service charge. I am leaseholder of a 3 bed flat in a purpose build block in London (Westminster) our service charge used to reflect the maintenance of the building and overall look and feel. But now not only service charge goes up every year but quality of service like general maintenance gone down. For example lifts keep breaking down, building needs refurb, walls are dirty, my windows are so old that in winter no matter how much heating you put on room still feel cold.    additionally they keep adding major works charges to service charge with this year being £1917 in addition to £1890 service charge. Don’t mind paying only if I see improvement in the block but we have only seen steady decline over many years now. So today I called them (city of Westminster) saying I don’t want to pay and cannot pay so high charges where there’s no evident results.    I came here to find if anyone has been successful in negotiations on regards to service charges complain or any advice regarding this. Charges are too for what we get    Thanks in advance  
    • this is going to be really simplistic, but have they started by talking to senior management now the bad apple has gone?
    • Hi everyone  . . .  Just an update   The CMD was this morning.  It started with cheap  manoeuvrability  by Intrum’s lawyer, but let me give you quick summery background:   The judge issued an order to us to submit evidence supporting our case such as call for witnesses or ask the court to order the original creditor to some action.  We were giving 21 days for the submission.  In my simple calculation without, allowing time to post, the final date was to be 10 March 2021, with post time 2 days later.   On the 10th March, and to be on the safe side, I send to the court the response version giving to me by DX100UK.   Then on 12th March, I send to the court the version giving to me by Andy, asking the court to replace the first document with the second  one.   On 7th of April I send Intrum lawyer the document 2 as it is our official response.   ON the 12th April I send the court the medical certificate for my niece asking to be viewed exclusively by the court.   At the start of the CMD the Judge ask Intrum lawyer to start.  So he started by claiming the following: 1.    We failed to meet the 21 days deadline set by the court. 2.    He received a response on the 7th April which is only a week ago. 3.    He admitted that he has the two version of our submission. He claimed that they were collected by colleague of his from the court’s Clark while he was in court. 4.    He said that this case has taken too long and the defendant just messing them about and keeping changing their plea.   At that time the judge announced that he does not have the two documents in the case file. He only has the medical certificate.  Then he turned to me to ask me for explanation. a)    I said that we met the deadline set by the court and submitted the required response.  Also I explained the issue with two documents. b)    I confirmed that we have received a confirmation form the court on their receipt of  my submission emails. c)    I stated that Intrum lawyer’s claim is incorrect that we failed to meet the deadline, and pointed out that he has our two documents in his possession which he obtained from the court.   Then the judge started asking Intrum lawyer on the content of the two documents, which is bizarre not to ask the author of the documents.   Intrum Lawyer stated that the two documents almost identical. He then started pointing out the negative sides in the documents such as our change of the 50% settlement.  He continued claiming that we are changing our defence without following the certain set procedure, which it seemed to confuse the judge. The lawyer  continued to ridicule the document in general without being specific.  At the end the judge turned to me  to response.   I said that the court must see the document as it is important to the case.  It is not correct to ask the lawyer to a brief the court on our document as he has been selective in what to read.  The judge came in and said that he asked the lawyer for a general summery of its content.   I continued that the full claim case is fundamentally flawed, and I continued to list why: 1.    The nature of the relation between the original creditor and defendant does not constitute the need for Financial Agreement between the two parties.  The claimant stated in their case that the defendant was in breach of a Financial Agreement. Where is this agreement? 2.    There is no Default Notice that the claimant stated in their submission there was a Default  Notice. 3.    Also has the original creditor served a notice of assignment on the defendant? 4.    The other fundamental issue is the question of the nature of the sum claimed!. .  .  .  . . .   At that time the judge stopped me asked me if I was asking for the other side to present these documents.   I responded:  Intrum are experienced organisation in this type of business.  They know very well the importance of these documents to the case, why they have not been  incorporated them in their case submission , . .  my answer Yes  . . . our missing response document put the claimant to Strict Proof to present these documents to the court.   The lawyer then announced that the Default Note was included in their submission and, he continued to quote a reference number, then he retracted his claim, which is I had a sense that he felt he has gone too far in his BS***t.   However, the judge spend most of session faltering and does not know what to say.  At the end he decided to go for another CMD. But then the funny part he asked the Claimant lawyer to send him the two missing documents.   I feel more positive now on the case but I would appreciate your views and comments.   Thank you
    • Had a reply from the Council today. While they didn't specifically say the car can be parked there, they gave me this bit of info which I am reading as parking being allowed during those hours as long as you don't enter the street:     Hadn't even considered deliveries! I live just outside the catchment area so I've never had problems, but it does make me wonder how Royal Mail, DPD and the rest are handling these kinds of restrictions...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Flyermonkey Vs Halifax Bank Of Scotland **WON


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Should the Bank of Scotland not be included under the Halifax group as they are now the same company?

 

I am taking the Bank Of Scotland to court over £2500 worth of charges and under Scottish law the limit for Small Claims is £750 and for Summary Causes is £1500 which means that I have to have a lawyer representing me, which is annoying as it takes so long the minute lawyers get involved! However the advantage (I think) in Scottish Law is that you can go to court in the place that you were due to be paid the money (rather than where the bank is based) which means that if you live in a remote location with few lawyers then the bank has to send a lawyer from at least a 120 miles away (and you know how much lawyers charge for their time....).

 

Interestingly enough, my solicitor can't get any more sense from the bank than I have ever got! So a writ is now winding its way to the local sherrif court, and hopefully will get some kind of reaction. As soon as I have further details and / or a reaction then I will update the site here.....

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the heads up on the BOS. I'll move it.

 

Amazingly low limits in Scotland, then but what are the rules for costs? I hoep that you don't lose but what happens if you do?

 

Do you want to repost or continue this in the BOS?halifax forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess its just as well leaving it here, as the law for Scotland is differant?

 

Yeah, it is a problem that the limits for Scotland are so much lower. I think that if I lose then i will have to pay most of their costs. I know that when I took a company to court a few years ago for not paying a £6000 bill (I was self-employed at the time) it dragged on for over a year with the company settling out of court the day before it was due to come up and I still had to pay over a third of my own legal costs, as the costs are set by the court (normally at half to two thirds of the actual costs). I assume that If I lose then I will have to pay a certain amount towards their legal costs, but as far as I understand it is limited - though last time it was still over £2000 plus their own costs that the losing side had to pay!

 

I am gambling on the fact that they won't want to take the risk of losing in a court and that if I have to pay some money out of my own pocket it will at least be less than the money I will lose by dropping the case.

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aargh!

Yes I think that the keeping jurisdictional things together is possibly a better idea.

I'll move it back.

 

Doh...!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have a Bank of Scotland Preference Account and have sent a letter asking for a schedule of charges to:

 

 

Bank of Scotland

Customer Relations Department

City House

City Road

Chester

CH99 3AN

 

In fact I have sent 2 letters. They say they did not receive the first so I sent the second one recorded. that was two weeks ago and they say they they still have not received it. I am pulling my hair out and am not sure what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have recorded delivery evidence that the letter was received by the Bank then frankly you don't need to do any more.

If the letter was a request for DPA disclosure then begin your complaint to the Information Commissioner.

If it wan't then now progress to a DPA discloure request - send it recorded delivery, of course.

 

I think that when the bank says that they haven't received correspondence which they clearly have because of recorded delivery evidence, then you just ignore them and keep trundling on to the next step until they "get it" and start responding to you.

To ignore correspondence in such an obvious way is simply a symptom of a large organisation which isn't used to being pushed around and they don't know what to do.

I think that it is a sign that you are doing well.

With a bit of luck they will mislay the summons as well. :twisted:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its any help, in over a years worth of 'correspondance' with the Bank Of Scotland neither I nor my solicitor have had any kind of sensible reply to any of our letters! They clearly either make a point of not replying to letters or are hopeless at dealing with paperwork.... I still get monthly letters from them and their debt collection agencies despite repeated requests to send them directly to my solicitor.

 

They are the most difficult company to get information from, even by phone or in a local branch as I have tried that route as well. I would just go straight down the legal path as at least you might get someones attention.

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent a letter by recorded delivery, the royal mail website will be able to tell you when it was successfully delivered, and the name of the person who signed for it. http://www.royalmail.com - give them the recorded delivery number and the date of posting.

 

Refusals of recorded mail mean the mail is returned to the sender; so I really can't believe it's been lost in the mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have two Preference Cards and a loan. I sent £3000 to pay half the loan and £2000 to pay one card off and £1000 to pay off the other. They cashed the cheques in October. Since then, I have received numerous letters and phone calls demanding money. I have sent them photocopies of the cashed cheques and they still have not quite sorted out where the money went. There are a load more wrinkles to this story, but I'm in a hurry at the moment, but it will keep for when the dust settles and I take action on their stunning incompetence.

 

Gerard

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread seems to have departed very well away from its original topic title.

I'm locking the thread and would be grateful if people who would like to continue any of the interesting discussions which have been started here could do so by beginning a new thread with a relevant title.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Another victory for the Bank Action Group after a long hard slog!

 

I started on this over a year ago and took on a solicitor to help me, but he turned out to be completely ineffectial so I took on another one 2 months ago.

 

Interestingly enough my account was with the Bank Of Scotland and I have always been resident in Scotland, but my solicitor advised me to try moneyclaim online as the Bank Of Scotland's head office is now the same as Halifax's in England and as the amount I was claiming was £4600 plus interest (£1200) it was still under the small claims threshhold in England.

 

It worked! They issued a notice of intention to claim and then they day before the court was going to set a date sent me a cheque for the full amount of charges, the interest as claimed and the £120 court fees.

 

Worth noting for any other Bank Of Scotland customers.

 

I am also working with my local MSP on putting out a press release about this, so if it gets published I will, of course, update the group.

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another victory for the Bank Action Group after a long hard slog!

 

I started on this over a year ago and took on a solicitor to help me, but he turned out to be completely ineffectial so I took on another one 2 months ago.

 

Interestingly enough my account was with the Bank Of Scotland and I have always been resident in Scotland, but my solicitor advised me to try moneyclaim online as the Bank Of Scotland's head office is now the same as Halifax's in England and as the amount I was claiming was £4600 plus interest (£1200) it was still under the small claims threshhold in England.

 

It worked! They issued a notice of intention to claim and then they day before the court was going to set a date sent me a cheque for the full amount of charges, the interest as claimed and the £120 court fees.

 

Worth noting for any other Bank Of Scotland customers.

 

I am also working with my local MSP on putting out a press release about this, so if it gets published I will, of course, update the group.

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great result.........but what a wait:mad:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I just used the moneyclaim online thing from Northhampton court - the only thing is that you need a mailing address in England, one of my friends volunteered and forwarded any mail onto me. It is just a mailing address, though, as I still used my own address in the pursuer section.

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a mailer address to use in England, - all my friends and family are Scottish does that mean I will have to follow the Scottish claims procedure??:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that the moneyclaim online procedure explicitly asks for a mailing address in England, so if you don't have one you can't go through it.

 

However, someone else on one of the threads asked if they can use an english solicitor which as far as I am aware would be fine. As, again, they would be only acting as your agent - the fees shouldn't be very much as you won't be asking them to go to court on your behalf or to prepare any legal documents as you would be doing these yourself.

 

The other posibilty is asking if any of the moderators would act as an agent? it doesn't involve anything other than forwarding mail (in my case it was three seperate pieces of correspondance, so not exactly a lot). There are no legal ramifications for them either, as again it is purely a mailing address.

 

Certainly it was much easier and better for me to do the whole amount in one go under English law than trying to do 7 seperate small claims as I would have had to do in Scotland - and the time it would have taken would have meant I would still be at it this time next year.

  • Confused 1

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure if a PO Box is acceptable, though as you point out the banks use one so it should be.

 

On the court form it just asks for a mailing address (if different from your own address) so I would guess that a PO Box would be fine. Like I say i don't actually know though?

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Go for it Clara, they will roll over and when you see that cheque come through I hope you are as pleased as I was!

Smile £315 Paid In Full March 2006 (no court action)

MBNA £2600 Paid In Full May 2006 (no court action)

HBOS £5800 Paid in Full August 2006 (action raised but not defended)

Morgan Stanley £585 Paid In Full August 2006 (no court action)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one suggestion..try speaking nicely to some of our English friends online and see if you can arrange to use one of them as a mailing address.. Its Just an Idea..lol

Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 :D:p (As Seen on TV) :p

Halifax settled in Full.. :D 22/09/06

TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06 :D

Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full

Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07

PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.

 

 

 

If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:

 

Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to using an English mailing address for moneyclaim. Could I/We let a mail box from (mail boxes etc) a letting company. Already looked into this briefly and the addresses they provide are normal, and they can also forward your mail on. Not too expensive either.

RBoS:(£570): *** WON *** £570 settled in full - HERE

Lloyds TSB: ** WON **

Abbey: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, 14/11/06 statements rec'd & partial offer (30%), declined, LBA sent 26/11/06

Studio Catalogue: S.A.R - sent 02/10/06, Prelim sent 21/11/06, won £94.95 refunded.

Capital 1: S.A.R 02/10/06, off’d diff between £20 and £12, declined 21/11/06

A&L: S.A.R -02/10/06, prelim sent 21/11/06, rejected, LBA sent 26/11/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am expecting the rest of my statements next week and then to begin the processes. However I have always lived in Scotland and the amount I estimate at the moment to claim from BoS is possibly about £11k, hence using the english court sysytem and moneyline would be more suitable. Do you have a contact address or email refrence for the PO Box?

 

Checxking my letter folder in my computer I have come across a letter that I wrote to bank in 2003, pinting out that they had taken over £4000 in charges during the past two years and asking for refund. There was no reply to that letter. Does that letter bear any significance to the five year period in Scotland?

Link to post
Share on other sites

FM, does this mean if you get someone with an English address, they can go through money claim and the English courts and claim back 6 years.

 

I am still at early stage with RBOS and would prefer to use English system as small claims threshhold would be more appropriate to me. (and I could get another year back!)

 

Oh, by the way... well done!:)

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...