Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

If it helps M&S settled


Deb T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

balance of the account....

 

Sent M&S a letter requesting a lowering of the current £20 monthly on a defaulted personal reserve that has been paid for 5 years without any problems but as circumstances have changed and my disability has taken more prominence...I sent them a letter requesting they look at the debt of 3.3k and either accept a £1 token pm reduced payment for the next 6 months...or that my family may be able to help out and pay off a ffs. M&S offered this to me last year at 40% of the total debt...I couldn't at that time afford it but have paid 12months payment since then...I thought the FFS amount may have reduced a bit further.

 

In any case they were sent the letter, it was friendly and basically asked them for help and contained a little medical history...

 

That was in June....I phone din July as there was nothing heard from M&S and they simply said they were dealing with it etc....

 

Mid September I called them again, same answer, can't accept the FFS but they're dealing with it and will come back to me.

 

I think they were fobbing me off...so I sent them a CCa request enclosing the original correspondence from June and giving this as one of the reasons for the CCA....at the same time as this I sent a SARS request...again enclosing all the previous correspondence and asking why nothing had been heard etc....

 

Last week I get a letter from M&S stating that they their enclosed CCA agreement is what they were asked to supply...and that they now wanted the amount in full or they would place it with outside collection agents and that they would be placing my account in default..

 

However they 'defaulted' me in 2004 after I wrote to them saying I could no longer meet the original payments....my credit file shows the default.

 

At the same time and included in the letter was a statement of account showing just one transaction in late September....of £10....this was my SARS request the cheeky buggers....

 

The last item included in the letter was a Terms and Conditions effective from 26th July 2007....I'm not sure why they sent that, the original agreement was from 1999 and weas defaulted by M&S in 2004 so surely I'm not bound by those conditions

 

They haven't sent any response to any of my previous correspondence, they've cashed a postal order for a SARS request of £10 but included it in a statement of account as the only entry and took it from my balance but no sars and the enclosed letter says they've complied with theur legal duties under section 77 and 78 of the consumer credit act...really?...they haven't sent a particularly legible credit agreement if thats what you can call it..and although it contains my details it doesn't appear to have all the correct credentials...

 

What you see in these links is what they sent me (my details removed of course) it is as poor in quality as what you see, I cannot remember what a personal reserver was...I think they offered it me...what you see is the application form I think....says it's a credit agreement though...

 

This to me is a cca request (which I sent them as well...but they've taken the £10 subject access and given nothing back etc....threatening me with external collection agents and that they may default me..even though they did this 5+ years ago...and they have not listened/answered or even bothered to acknowledge my recorded delivery letters/requests to them...

 

Here is what they sent me...I've removed all my details/signature from it...

 

http://www.partnerpick.com/userspace/user3727/ms/ms1.jpg

 

and this ...which has a postmark on..no idea what it's about..

 

http://www.partnerpick.com/userspace/user3727/ms/ms2.jpg

 

What next?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would leave it the 40 days then chae the SAR. In writing after the 40 days give them a further 7/14 days informing them if they have not complied then u will report to the ICO.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the documentation they sent as in enforceabilty and their threats to default and their non answering of letters when asking them for help?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deb.

 

I dont really want to miss advise you on those due to them not being readable.

 

I would write back reminding them they have not complied as the documents are NOT LEGABLE.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it depends on a lot of things. They can send a application form as long as they send the t&cs in relation to the account when the account was opened and there is a clear link to them but as i cannot read what u have posted then i would not comment on it.

 

 

I would send a letter advising that they need to provide a legable copy of your cca and the t&cs of when the account was opened.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs,

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

This account is in Dispute .

On xx/xx/2007 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I have enclosed an excerpt from page 5 of the guidance which states

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

I trust this out lines the situation

 

idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

with me, took me a 7 months of writing to them, in that time they produced the original agreement and initially were somewhat difficult to even get a straight answer from. Sometimes I got different answers to the same question on the same day.

 

But, I continued on regardless and in the end M&S accepted a FFS from me, was at a reduced rate by some margin but in essence they settled and my debt with them is no longer.

 

I've read here for many months, all of us seem to have the same problem with M&S albeit it slightly different circumstances but anyway, there is light at the end of the tunnel, keep persevering with them, find a contactr above the drones of the Customer Services etc...and you might just get lucky, I did.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

had did they record this on your credit file

 

 

They recorded the default 5+ years ago, they've now since the FFS updated it to show as 'settled' and it will drop off in 3 months due to the default being 6 years old.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...