Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA (via AIC) partial/short settlement offer - pls advise


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Its been a while since I have posted on here, but am wondering whether anyone can offer me some advice on MBNA's Partial/short settlements.

I have been given the 'opportunity' to pay £4,300 to clear a £10,500 debt. I think my mum will help with this.

 

Brief history; ill health during pregnancy, premanture child, made redundant, resulted in lots of debt.

 

My problem; I am very concerned that after I make this payment, MBNA will simply sell this debt on and someone else will chase the debt. Do you think the letter below will cover this; would a court for instance find favour with me if someone did pursue this debt a later stage or am I simply wasting my time.

 

My credit file is shot to pieces and am fed up of having this debt hanging over me so I am not too concerned about having a partial settlement showing on my credit file. I really would like to move on with my life, (copy of letter below) please advise.

 

Allied International Credit (UK) Limited

Anderston House

389 Argyle Street

Glasgow

G2 8LR

22 March 2010

 

WITHOUT PREDJUDICE

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Reference Number: 000000 MBNA

I am writing with reference to the money which you are claiming on the above MBNA account.

 

Regarding our discussions regarding the options of settling this account over the telephone. I confirm I may be able to raise £4,300 to offer an ex-gratia payment in return for a partial and final settlement of the account. This payment would be made by internet banking via a 3rd party.

This offer is made on the clear understanding that, if accepted, neither you, any associate company, any debt collector or other third party will take any other action to enforce or pursue this debt in any way whatsoever, that no other payments will be demanded and that I will be released from any liability.

 

I also request that, if accepted, you will make an entry on a credit reference agency file relating to the above account as "satisfied" and the balance set to £0.00/nil.

 

This offer is available until April 15th 2010. Payment can be made before 31st April 2010, if I receive your written agreement of this offer on or before 15th April 2010.

 

I apologise for any inconvenience to you but to ensure that there is no future confusion or misrepresentation written confirmation on the above is required.

 

I look forward to receiving your reply in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

MBNA

CC. MBNA

Edited by clowders
removal of account info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DCA and dotty, yes tried to CCA a couple of years ago, and have been paying £30per month without hearing a peep out of them. But I feel this debt is affecting my life choices and future plans.

 

I have a CCJ from Natwest, so I am not concerned about having a partial settlement recorded on credit file, but I just dont trust MBNA and wonder whether a court would find in my favour if they agreed to marking the outstanding balance as Nil, and stating that neither they or a third party would chase the debt and then chased the remaining debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trust AIC as far as I could throw them. You can be assured that whatever arrangement you make with them they will sell the rest of the debt on to another DCA and you won't have heard the last of it. I am surprised you are paying them anything if they haven't produced an agreement and proof they are lawfully entitled to ask for payment. They bought your debt for pence in the pound and are making a fortune out of you. I wouldn't pay them a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pinky, you make a very good point about whether AIC are legally entitled to ask for payment. I will request confirmation of this in writing from both AIC and MBAN but MBNA refuse to speak to me stating that I must speak to AIC who own the debt (AIC, however have stated that they do not own the debt and are merely tasked with collecting).

 

I understand your viewpoint on why I am trying to make any payments, but for my health and sanity I need to close this debt off if possible and if a short/partial settlement is a valid option then i'm open to exploring it.

 

Hence, why I am seeking assistance in ascertaining whether this is just a ploy or a good way (if you can raise the funds) to end the debt.

 

My dilemma is if they agree in writing to set the balance to nil and not to chase me in the future or pass to a 3rd party, is whether to believe whether that would be the end of the matter or if it is just another ploy whether the courts would view favourably on me and my copy of the letter making these claims....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi twofoot,

 

I will send letters on monday to MBNA to confirm who has the authority to collect and make settlement offers on their behalf. I think if they do not agree to the terms in my letter ie; set balance to nil and confirm that the debt will not be passed on or sold to any related or 3rd party company, then this must be just a ploy otherwise what is the problem with agreeing, right?

 

If this is the case I will simply inform them that the offer will be avilable under these terms for a further 10 days before being offered to my other creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If AIC own the debt, and I expect they are lying to you that they don't if MBNA say AIC bought the debt, MBNA will already have a zero balance on the account because they will have written it off against tax and sold it on to AIC. If that is the case MBNA cannot negotiate you. I take it the offer was from AIC, who will want a quick return on their investment then sell on the residue. That's how these leeches work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a CCA request to AIC if they're the ones collecting on it - but send it Recorded Delivery at the very least, and retain proof of postage (this is important).

 

If you send it normal post, they will deny ever receiving it. You should be able to find an effective CCA letter in the templates library.

 

What will happen is that when AIC get the letter and £1 statutory payment for fulfilment of the request, AIC will pocket the CCA payment and try to offset it against the value of the 'debt'. Don't worry - they're well known for this, even though they shouldn't be doing it.

 

For that reason, you need to emphasise that the enclosed £1 postal order payment (do NOT send a cheque, as it'll contain your signature) is to be used for satisfying the CCA request and NO other purpose.

 

I can't stress enough the importance of NEVER sending your signature or anything containing your signature to companies like this.

 

Retain the Postal Order number for your own records, or refer to it in your letter (which you should also keep a copy of).

 

AIC will probably never forward your request onto the client, but that's their problem. Moreover, if MBNA assigns anyone else to collect, just refer them back to AIC and the unfulfilled CCA request they received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...