Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help, don't know where else to go.


leon_telford
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Last year in March I lost my unborn daughter at 20 months old due to

Stafford Hospital falling to get correct a long standing internal

bleeding problem with my ex girlfriend. My ex had a life saving

operation which left her not being able to have any more children and

also with a large scar on her belly.

 

She got awarded about £600k in compensation. However she then started

a claim against the hospital for the loss of our daughter.

 

The hospital offered a out of court settlement for about £800k which

she rejected. Due to go to court in July.

 

Our relationship fell apart after the loss and she refuses to give me

any of the money, am I entitled to make a claim against the Hospital

myself? My name is on the headstone and I went to see my dead daughter

and I think I put my name on the forms.

 

Verbally we did agree to share the money but nothing in writing. As

her Dad do I have any rights to make a claim? Have made a complaint to

the hospital and waiting to hear back.

 

Any help / advice would be useful.

 

Please help suffering from depression over this and want justice for

my daughter. Feel free to email me back.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I think it's called 'Negligence', the hospital has failed to carry out a duty of care. In the scheme of things it should help the NHS improve things. If everyone sat back and did nothing, nothing would improve.

 

I'm sorry for your loss, however not sure how you gaining a large sum of money from the NHS from losing your daughter helps get her justice.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it probably was negligence of the very worse sort, that wasn't my point.

 

The OP's ex partner is already suing the hospital, the duty of care issue is already being sorted. She was obviously the person who suffered the most, after all she can't have children and was left badly scarred. (I think she deserves whatever payout she gets).

 

The OP is obviously so distressed by the loss of his daughter he is worried to bits that he isn't going to get any of the compensation resulting from this tragedy.

 

Dreadful horrible things happen within the NHS etc and most certainly many of them are negligence and should be compensated, but so often the first thing that comes to most people's mind in today's compensation culture is how much can we get out of it.

 

I find this bit particularly distasteful.

Our relationship fell apart after the loss and she refuses to give me

any of the money,

 

Sorry if I'm a cynic, but I've seen it happen so often.

 

Kymi

Edited by kymi
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a RN and I've worked for the NHS for the last 35 years, I agree with you entirely.

There is a compensation culture, but you can't sterotype, every case on it's merits. For every case the NHS deals with I'm sure a % get turned down. The NHS isn't what it once was.

 

I now work in Governance, Risk Management which is closely liasied with Negligence, Legal claims etc so I see a lot of the claims which are put forward. We're very lucky. The Trust I work for is pretty decent, however things still do go wrong and it's very often our fault.

 

Pees me off when we fight something so obviously our fault. Also pees me off when we give in to stuff that so obviously isn't because its just cheaper in the long run to pay up.

 

Cheers

Kymi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes a very confusing first post,

 

HI - It still isn't clear from the OP whether the baby was "unborn" or "20months" ?

 

I would suspect the baby was stillborn with additional complications for mum. I suspect she probably had to have a hystorectomy hence the scar.

 

It sounds a very sad case.

 

Kymi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the compensation culture be so bouyant if the NHS management were open and transparent in their dealings with complainants and were accountable for their failures? Would it be necessary to litigate if existing bodies (the CQC, the NMC, the GMC and the Ombudsman) actually helped and protected us before and when things go horribly wrong, rather than being the self-serving and inept organisations that they are?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably not Sali,

Would the compensation culture be so bouyant if the NHS management were open and transparent in their dealings with complainants and were accountable for their failures? Would it be necessary to litigate if existing bodies (the CQC, the NMC, the GMC and the Ombudsman) actually helped and protected us before and when things go horribly wrong, rather than being the self-serving and inept organisations that they are?

Personally I think the NHS has a huge amount to answer for, not least in the way it treats not only its patients etc but also the staff who work for them.

 

I certainly don't begrudge anyone the compensation they receive if its genuine., but I've seen many cases where its very obvious that money is the guiding factor.

 

Kymi

Edited by kymi
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Umm yes I agree, but I personally didn't get the vibes from the OP that he was fighting for truth and justice, did you?

 

Call me a cynic, (many people do), but in my experience I've seen an awful lot more people fight for a cash handout than truth and justice.

 

There are many people who litigate, not for profit, but for truth and justice, because the current system provides neither.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...