Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I understand that a Trustee in bankruptcy enjoys extensive powers, certainly extending to historical bank records and statements.

 

Do the Trustee in bankruptcy powers extend to demanding historical bank records / statements of a spouse ( independent account, not a joint account )?

 

In practice might a a Trustee in bankruptcy also review the historical spending of credit card accounts? Or would the Trustee in bankruptcy more likely accept the debt figure claimed by the credit card company without further review?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that a Trustee in bankruptcy enjoys extensive powers, certainly extending to historical bank records and statements.

 

Do the Trustee in bankruptcy powers extend to demanding historical bank records / statements of a spouse ( independent account, not a joint account )?

 

If they suspect you have been concealing assets in a spouses accounts then yes they can.

In practice might a a Trustee in bankruptcy also review the historical spending of credit card accounts? Or would the Trustee in bankruptcy more likely accept the debt figure claimed by the credit card company without further review?

 

They won't dispute the figure but can still look through the accounts to see if your spending has been reckless and possibly the cause of your current situation,

 

Is it something specific you are being investigated on?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I am not being investigated ( at least not yet ) I jut want to get a better feel for 'a very new world'.

 

Reckless spending aside, it seems to me that there might be instances where a person might have made a credit card transfer in favour of a third party - possibly a family associate - so the debt ended up on the bankrupt's credit card, and I wonder whether or not that might be likely to be picked up by a trustee, and therefore potentially vulnerable to a trustee claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I am not being investigated ( at least not yet ) I jut want to get a better feel for 'a very new world'.

 

Reckless spending aside, it seems to me that there might be instances where a person might have made a credit card transfer in favour of a third party - possibly a family associate - so the debt ended up on the bankrupt's credit card, and I wonder whether or not that might be likely to be picked up by a trustee, and therefore potentially vulnerable to a trustee claim.

 

It would all depend on the size, age and nature of the transfer - £5K on what was probably a joint household debt 2 years ago, would be treated very differently to £10K, a few days or weeks before you went BR.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would all depend on the size, age and nature of the transfer - £5K on what was probably a joint household debt 2 years ago, would be treated very differently to £10K, a few days or weeks before you went BR.

 

Yes that's a good answer.

What about the chances of it falling fro review, or is this impossible to say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Impossible to say, but generally speaking the OR will go through all your accounts with a fine toothcomb - I've known relatively small transactions of less than £50 be questioned, and large ones for holidays of £3K to be ignored. Luck of the draw of the OR really.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck of the draw of the OR really.

 

For OR I am substituting 'Trustee in bankruptcy' unless I have that wrong.

 

Can it be equally noted : Luck of the draw of the Trustee in bankruptcy? Can one have any influence on this? I understand that it is in the power of a disgruntled creditor to fund a ( hard ) Trustee in bankruptcy. Is it equally in the power of ( friendly ) creditors to fund an ( easier ) Trustee in bankruptcy?

 

Does the power of influence of a disgruntled creditor extend only to funding, or might they also appoint a preferred Trustee in bankruptcy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do the Trustee in bankruptcy powers extend to demanding historical bank records / statements of a spouse ( independent account, not a joint account )?

 

"If they suspect you have been concealing assets in a spouses accounts then yes they can."

 

In order to make a demand for a spouses account records is it enough for them to have a 'suspicion' or would it be necessary for them to see a link or a paper trail - such as a direct transfer?

 

Clearly just because a partner has assets, they are not necessarily the fruits of an exercise of concealment. With whom would the burden of proof lie to establish they were / were not the result of illicit transfers?

 

If there were any concerns ( of the bankrupt ) might there be some advantage in separation / divorce prior to bankruptcy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"If they suspect you have been concealing assets in a spouses accounts then yes they can."

 

I don't think this is true. It is my experience that they cannot look at a spouses bank account if it is not joint

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, The trustee is usually the Official Receiver in most cases, only where you have significant assets is an external trustee likely to be appointed, although the majority of creditors can ask for an external trustee at any time. The trustee deals with assets only, the Official Receiver deals with the conduct of the bankrupt.

 

In theory the OR can privatly examine in court any person who appears to have information pertaining to the affairs of the bankrupt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this is true. It is my experience that they cannot look at a spouses bank account if it is not joint

 

Obviously this might be a more appealing answer, and in some ways seems more logical to me if the legal basis is that all persons are independent entities.

I would have thought such a power would be vested by specific legislation, or regulations.

 

Now we have two conflicting viewpoints in this thread.

 

How might I find out for certainty? Is there any guidebook like a trustee in bankruptcy handbook?

 

( And is there any guidebook covering early mover strategies for a potential bankrupt? )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

what exactly are your worrys,if its a transfer of an assett before going br the OR can have this reversed going back 5 yrs,they usually investigate the bankrupts statements between 2 to 5yrs if they see any what they deem to be unreasonable behaviour they can go back longer,if gambling has been involved,casinos,internet,horses,stocks and shares,they can apply a bankruptcy restictions order which will tie you into the terms of the br for anywhere betweeen 1-15yrs hope some of this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi as i said they can get hold of the statements but if she refused they would need a court order, whether that would be granted depends on the personal circumstances

 

Now that's got me thinking - I wonder what the sort of personal circumstances might be for a court to grant such an order. It sounds like a lot of potential trouble and cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Wonder if anybody on this forum can help my friend, approx 3 years ago they had double glazing fitted to their property. which was a shambles they refused to pay and got made bankrupt by firms solicitor, glazing was £6000 which was paid into court but sol fees etc were £2800 which they didnt have ,it was then passed over to trustees who have now made the debt £54000?, as a result of this they are taking my friends house with approx £70000 equity off them , does anybody on here know how this debt can esculate to that ammount legaly , they are on the point of a nervous breakdown?.

Any advise would be app, they have tried various routes cit advise ,local sol, but they are on min wage and only 30 hours per week, council want to use gov scheme to buy and rent property back to them ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Wonder if anybody on this forum can help my friend, approx 3 years ago they had double glazing fitted to their property. which was a shambles they refused to pay and got made bankrupt by firms solicitor, glazing was £6000 which was paid into court but sol fees etc were £2800 which they didnt have ,it was then passed over to trustees who have now made the debt £54000?, as a result of this they are taking my friends house with approx £70000 equity off them , does anybody on here know how this debt can esculate to that ammount legaly , they are on the point of a nervous breakdown?.

Any advise would be app, they have tried various routes cit advise ,local sol, but they are on min wage and only 30 hours per week, council want to use gov scheme to buy and rent property back to them ...

 

( I am not sure how things work here but I wonder if the administrator could carve this as a separate post?? )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but this isnt all debts , just trustees fees over 2 years?, they are pushing to get house only because my friend owns their house and works? has been told if they didnt own house this would have been written off, sad indicment this work and buy your home and this is what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Wonder if anybody on this forum can help my friend, approx 3 years ago they had double glazing fitted to their property. which was a shambles they refused to pay and got made bankrupt by firms solicitor, glazing was £6000 which was paid into court but sol fees etc were £2800 which they didnt have ,it was then passed over to trustees who have now made the debt £54000?, as a result of this they are taking my friends house with approx £70000 equity off them , does anybody on here know how this debt can esculate to that ammount legaly , they are on the point of a nervous breakdown?.

Any advise would be app, they have tried various routes cit advise ,local sol, but they are on min wage and only 30 hours per week, council want to use gov scheme to buy and rent property back to them ...

 

Sorry to hear about your friends situation. I can fully understand what they must be going through as I too went through something similar. Unfortunately there is not a lot of help around regarding Trustee in Bankruptcy and if there is I never found it. This is all a [problem] and one of the reasons why this country is where it is today.

From a 6k debt to rise to 70k is nothing but disgusting and makes my blood boil as this has bought back very bitter memories of my own. Here is a link which I hope will be helpful for your friend.

 

Bankruptcy Help: Bankruptcy Help Forum, articles, blogs, TV channel ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...