Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lasting Power Of Attorney / Court Of Protection help wanted please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just need a bit of advice really. A bit of background on this one: a relative of mine has an eldery parent who lived alone in a council bungalow. While the council were making repairs she stepped into a hole they had made in the floor and broke her leg. She spent 9 months in hospital as a result and now lives in a care home. The council admitted liability for the accident and a compensation claim is under way.

 

My relative has Lasting Power of Attorney for his parent's financial and personal affairs.

 

The solicitor for the counncil is pushing to have the compensation paid into the Court of Protection.

 

The worry is that the council will plunder the court of protection to pay for her care. My relative wants to ensure the money is paid into a trust or something where the council can't touch it.

 

How does the LPA affect this please?

Edited by lunar jim
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the paid compensation increases her net worth, then it is only right that (under the current rules) the taxpayer is treated fairly. From what you describe, by attempting to place the payment 'out of reach' the council will be funding her dependent's inheritance, whilst having to pay for her care and upkeep as well,

 

For those who have actually made provision for their old age, then it not unreasonable to expect them to pay for the costs they incur whilst living out their years. Should this money run out, then the council would step in to ensure the levels of care are not compromised.

 

Trying to hive off this money to allow relatives t5o benefit is not the way the system was designed, and I cannot see how you could insist on changing this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understand what you're saying, but, the question is around how the LPA works: does the council's request to pay the money into the CP override the LPA, or can my relative choose where the money is paid, as his parent would do were they able?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see how it 'overrides the LPA's wishes - if a cash benefit is payable, then it can come in many different way, a cheque or bank transfer. I don;t believe the CP will be interested in holding onto this as a valid LPA nominee can then move it to wherever it will do the most benefit - high interest account, premium bonds or whatever. It just sound as being a ruse - why not call the CP and explain your concerns?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the point.

 

It makes no sense that the council pays itself because of it's own fault, but if the care home were run privately, not by the council, the net result would be the same.

 

Such is the Alice in Wonderland world of local government!

 

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how much compensation is expected or what other capital this elderly person has but she's certainly entitled to hold onto £23,000 of her money for the moment and they can't ever touch the last £14,000. See below.

Savings

 

If you have savings which you hold jointly with your partner, we will assume you have equal shares.

 

  • Over £23,000 - You will have to pay the full cost of your placement until your savings fall below this amount. Once your savings approach this amount you need to contact the council's Central Duty Team. They will arrange to assess your needs and finances.
  • Between £14,000 and £23,000 - You will have to pay £1 a week for every £250 or part of £250 of your savings.
  • Under £14,000 - We will ignore your savings when we are assessing your finances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...