Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SLC - Post 1998 'new style' debt dilemma URGENT!


vincentcalhoun
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

 

I took out 'new style' (income-based repayment) student loans between 1998 and 2002, then after I graduated I went and worked abroad, not telling the SLC and not making any arrangements to defer payment. I spent the next 6 years abroad. I came back in Sep 2008, did a postgrad course, and still didn't get in touch with them. I've been claiming job seeker's allowance for the past 7 months or so, and still haven't gotten in touch with them, as I'm not earning so there doesn't seem to be much point. So in total it's been almost 8 years since I defaulted on my student loan and stopped contact with them. I took out around 3000 pounds or less per year for the 4 years, so plus penalties and interest its probably 20k-25k or more, god knows. I haven't heard anything from them for a long time.

 

Anyway, 1 week from now I will start working for a company on a temporary contract, for 3 months. The pay will be a fixed 850 pounds a month, with no scope for earning more. Clearly this falls well under the 15k minimum level required by the SLC. Regardless of this, I will have to fill in a p46 form when I start working for my new employer. There is a box on the p46 which obligates me to tick it if I still have unpaid student loans to pay. I dont have to tick this if I have made arrangements to repay loans directly to the SLC via bank transfer.

 

I'm wondering what the best course of action would be?

 

1. I am still currently claiming job seeker's allowance, and will be doing so for 1 more week. Should I contact the SLC and admit my guilt/plead ignorance/plead poverty, and offer to pay them 20 pounds a month, saying im unemployed, it's the best I can do? Do you think they would accept this?

 

2. Should I just tick the box on my p46 form, let my employer know about it, and hope the SLC don't hassle me? It's only 3 months, the pay is obviously next to nothing in terms of an annual salary anyway, and after 3 months I will be starting another full time education course, with a possible view to working abroad again.

 

 

What should I do? Will they tell me to shove my 20 quid a month up my backside and demand huge repayments/threaten court action? I got the impression they would be more reasonable than other creditors, as the debt is never really written off and they will get the money once I start earning a decent wage in the UK. If they are going to be as nasty as other creditors chasing a debt, I'm wondering if it's best just to wait and see if they contact me, rather than put myself on the radar?

 

What should I do???

Link to post
Share on other sites

If £20 is all that you can afford then that's all you can afford.

 

It's really up to you with what you feel more comfortable with

 

IDa x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...