Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LLOYDS CCA Reply- comments please


HOWLER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3924 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats identical to what I was sent. I presume there was a copy of current agreement and a fresh copy of what was apparently your original agreement with your name and address. If so I asked the same thing here, so I guess the letter would be the same as what you need. :)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/250238-actual-rights-copy-original.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to clarify it is stated as 12 +2 working days. The 2 days are to cover postal days if send recorded by first class post. These would be Monday to Friday.

 

The 12 days are also working days Monday to Friday (not counting any bank holidays).

 

As the OC have already replied with what they perceive as the correct documentation, you do not strictly speaking have to wait the 12 days before replying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Please be assured we would not have opened a credit card account without having sight of a signed agreement” - I love that line!

Remember, this is Royds TSB, and nothing's too idiotic for them.

Sounds a bit like, 'we would not have pushed through unlawful transactions through Iran and The Sudan'

or 'we would not have alienated the entire Islamic community by lying about Interpal and then getting caught lying'

or 'we would not have cost the taxpayer £17 billion with a colossally badly thought-out company takeover',

or 'we would not have let the government shaft us into said takeover',

or 'we would not be asking the UK government for another handout to bail us out as our share price is hovering just over the 50p mark'.

Royds TSB follows entirely automated processes which - I was once told - can't be changed or shut down.

Wait till the end of this year, and we'll see then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Lucky you, they found an enforceable agreement and forwarded to me 3 days after the initial letter.

I'm fairly sure that if they find it they will forward a copy to you but for now the accounts in dispute so i'd just sit tight.

 

Lloyds do seem 1 of the more efficient banks and seem to be pretty on the ball at the moment in regards to CCA requests in realisation people wont pay if the accounts in dispute and by sending a good copy it causes minimum delay in payment so i'd say its looking good for you at the moment and the old cliche of no news is good news certainly comes into play :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanx Craig

but have you read the "Final Response" letter i have just added ?

I got a final response as well despite the fact they had sent me the original CCA.

Also a letter informing me they are looking further into my complaint. It would seem that its all handled by different departments and they dont communicate hence not a lot of responses making much sense and being all over the place.

I actually think there is probably a whole department with the job of sending out CCA's and nothing else.

 

I personally think if they had 1 they'd of sent it you so take it as good news.

 

Sit back wait and see what happens.

Edited by Craigbadger
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Regards their Final Response letter , do you think i should reply ?

 

I would in the very least ask them how they can state "Even in circumstances where an agreement is unenforceable (which for the avoidance of doubt is not the case in relation to your agreement)" unless they actually have a copy of the original agreement which begs the question why they have not produced a copy of it.

:rolleyes:

Something along the lines of "With respect it is for me to ascertain whether the agreement is enforceable this was after all one of the primary objectives of the disputed CCA request. It is not for you or your representatives simply to tell me the agreement is enforceable whilst deliberately denying me sight of a true copy of that agreement.

(With reference to the OFT guidance in the matter of claiming an agreement exists when it does not or is enforceable when it is not):

By stating that the agreement in question is enforceable in your final response letter you imply that you have a copy of the agreement and a suitably qualified employee has checked the document for enforceability, please therefore confirm

1) Whether or not the original agreement exists.

2) The legal qualifications of the employee who has apparently checked the legality of this document.

3) Why you still refuse to supply me sight of this document despite a genuine and lawful request to this end and a clear proclamation that you have nothing to lose by supplying it.

4) The grounds upon which you aver the agreement to be enforceable.

 

I am fully aware of the legalities surrounding the existence of the debt whether enforceable or not, I simply require clarification by my own expert in these matters over whether the agreement is enforceable by Court action or irredeeemably unenforceable and an independent scrutiny of the charges, terms and conditions applied to this account over it's lifetime.

I do not expect and will not accept you simply to tell me it is enforceable without supplying your reasoning and evidence, the most obvious solution if it is as you claim enforceable is to furnish me with a copy at this early stage, your reluctance to do this despite your indirect assertion that the document exists leads me to draw my own conclusion such conclusion being that the original either does not exist at all or is irredeemably unenforceable, there is no other logical explanation for your obstinance in this matter, it would have been easier and cheaper for you to have supplied a copy of the original than to enter into an extended dialogue with myself and what looks increasingly like investigations of complaints by both the OFT and the FOS.

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you jasper

this site amazes me, you people just keep on coming up trumps.

as this account is now in dispute, can they carry on charging interest ?

is there anything else i should be doing ?

thanks yet again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Lloyds forum.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

thank you jasper

this site amazes me, you people just keep on coming up trumps.

as this account is now in dispute, can they carry on charging interestlink3.gif ?

is there anything else i should be doing ?

thanks yet again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...