Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Forgive my ignorance but I assume take out dates would be when next payment is usually due? Jacamo is the 10th of each month Vanquis is usually the 6th or 7th of each month
    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - Summons / Form 04 citation - old welcome finance debt - SB'd?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2699 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

walker love serving a small claims form 1a no doubt

 

bet cabot and nolans are involved somewhere too

 

how are you gauging the SB?

if you took credit out in England and moved north later

6yrs applies sadly

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it'd some kind of paperwork to do with welcome sb'd account. "Motion to oppose"

 

I thought I already had said I was defending

and entered my defence but hey ho,

 

what's another piece of paper

Link to post
Share on other sites

in other words they are disputing your SB defence.

 

pers I would not have used the word secured or told them as such

if they [the pursuers] don't write as such about a debt on the citation

 

I would not have told them .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The would not send out a motion to oppose just to dispute a sb? or any defense that i have ever seen

 

what does the motion actually state?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ida, it doesn't say anything other than form G7 Motion to Oppose in the case of Cabot v Me and I should return form G9( noice of opposition to motion)

The Form of Motion states that I have failed to lodge written defences timeously. But I have!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no harm in ringing the court and asking what is going on.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went to the sherrif clerks office today.the only thing they can suggest is that shoosmiths think there may not be enough info in my defences.had to pay another £45 to submit a motion to oppose

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is statute barred end off.

 

That's all you need to state nothing else.

 

Watch out for them wanting a little chat before the hearing.

 

Don't !!

 

You have nothing to negotiate over

And do not let them get away with not meeting your costs

Esp the fee you just had to pay

You should not be having to pay anything

The debt is extinguished under Scottish law

 

Now belt and braces for ref

 

The agreement that might be produced (but not at this hearing..if if if ..it goes further)

Will be a rewrite not signed by you

But prob signed by a member of welcome staff over the phone

It might well have a hand written account number

That's is no good

Your org 2004 one would have been typed

And I bet you have a copy in your old sar??

 

But anyway they've got the SB hurdle to jump first!!!!!

 

DX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only what the citation states pages 1 & 2 I think it is?

 

its for them to prove its not sb'd

not for you to prove it is.

 

I would suspect it will be relisted or whatever the Scottish eqv is

to give the pursuer time to produce whatever they intend to rely upon to counter your SB claim.

 

not really too sure.

 

but they certainly can't magic anything up regarding that to the sheriff

as you've not seen it,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have edited post as i have just read the full thread.

 

This is a secured loan so the SB rules are different its 20 years not 5

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would only apply for a charge once you have failed payments so thats' what they will be looking for now so you cannot sell unless you pay up.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

gonna see if it can get confirmation either way with something from previous case

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Janis,

 

I was meaning would try and get something to link too.

 

There does not have to be an actual charge on a property for the secured loan.

 

Up here the secured loan is still under "secured rules" which means that they have 20 years to enforce for payment.

 

Creditors are likely to apply to court for an inhibition order which prevents you from selling your home until the debt is paid which has to be renewed every 5 years.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres a thread here somewhere

about welcome removing the majority of its security against secured loans

and how it appeared, and to this day, that all security was removed and welcome were no longer legally interested in that side of

the loan

they resorted to a std loan.

 

as far as I'm aware, if a creditor removes the requirement for security, that's the end of it.

 

but ok Scotland might be diff.

 

I think the info is on the FCA website but it certainly here

IMHO I'd call their [cabots] bluff, prove what the loan is secured against if needs be.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck for tomorrow.

 

Lets us know what happens and pay attention to what the judge says as they can give clues

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing is ever simple is it?? S

 

went to my options hearing today and

 

the Sheriff told me that there are rules which I should abide by and I haven't.

 

By not seeking legal advice and entering "legal Defences".

I now have 2 weeks to do so and return in September.

 

I was sure that my own defence was sufficient and no-one told me otherwise.

 

Cabot were also awarded expenses since the Motion calling was dismissed.

 

now I am £130 court fees down as well as having to get a solicitor and pay them and expenses

Link to post
Share on other sites

why the beep do you need legal help on a debt that is statute barred and shouldn't even be in court?

 

 

puzzled?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...