Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Littlewoods - Received Baliff Letter - Help!!


al_cooper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Some help again please!! :confused:

 

Received a letter today from the baliffs via Littlewoods catalogue demanding the full amount i owe them (around £400).

 

1) I cannot afford this!!

2) What do i do now, i was just in the process of writing to Littlewoods offering them a payment plan with my budget enclosed.

 

Many thanks

Alex

-x-

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only way they can use bailiff action is if you default on a ccj. until then all they can do is ask for the money back and mess about with your credit rating or take you to court. remember to argue that if they WERE to take you to court then you will end up paying an amount you can afford anyway, so it is in their interest to accept your reasonoable offer.

 

my next question. did you ever sign a credit agreement with littlewoods?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only way they can use bailiff action is if you default on a ccj.

I may be a little dim, but im 100% sure what a default is!! :? :p

 

Yes, i did sign a credit agreement with them too.

 

Thanks

Alex

-x-

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

 

just a bit intrigued, I have two accounts with littlewoods and are approx £1000 each i am paying them through payplan at the moment but i have never signed credit agreements with them, do i actually have to pay then???

***Nationwide***

Data Protection Sent 05/08/06

Statements received 17/08/06

Prelim Sent Rec Delivery £1231.50 18/08/06

LBA Sent 11/09/06 Rec Delivery

N1 Issued 28/09/2006 for £1561.80 inc Interst

Date of Service 30/09/2006

***WON*** NATIONWIDE PAID 12/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can phone the debt collection agency now dealing with the debt and they can set up lower payments with you.

 

They wont instruct ballifs or take court action as long as you are honest and reasonable in repaying the debt.

 

If you STILL cannot make the payments they are wanting from yourself (they usually want the amount cleared within 6 months), you can ask the cccs or CAB to go through your income and expenditure and they legally have to accept a negotiated payment with them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a debt with Littlewoods/Peter Craig. The debt was Passed between about 3 different DCA's Now it is with A company called Interim Justitia. Who told me they would only accept £50 per month. Untill I spoke to the person who is dealing with my account and they accepted £25 per month for 3 months.

 

After serveral phone calls from them asking for higher payments and having to remind that my wife is not named on this account (As they were giving her information covered by data protection) I sent them a Statment of earnings and set up a standing order for the £25 pound.

 

Worked for me with this particular company.

 

llktwelch

Link to post
Share on other sites

bump

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you need to pay for something if you have not signed a credit agreement??

 

It depends on your own moral compass.

 

You are still liable for the debt and it could be argued that by making payments you have admitted this liability.

 

However, they would have a difficult time defending an action in court if they could not produce a signed copy of your agreement.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

what if admin charges have been applied to that account which you claim to be unlawfull under the oft ruling?.. these companies have no morals so why put this in the equation..i am just having a go at this bunch with my sister who had an account with them...i hit them and there agents with a cca request asking for original signed agreement, neither have complied....i have used this and charges and non service of a summons to attempt to have a ccj removed she knew nothing about...we shall see what happens eh,now its with the court!! but i feel there is not much chance on there part.

"ALWAYS QUOTE ME AS BEING MISQUOTED" :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...