Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Full & Final Offers


billyray
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I was recently offered 70p in the pound from Newmans. This was after I asked them to supply an executable copy of my agreement with AMEX from 1997!

 

Surprise, surprise, all I received was a copy of the application form unsigned by them and no copy of the terms and conditions.

 

I am still waiting.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - I ignored it.

 

If they cannot send a copy of the executable form of the agreement - they will not be able to enforce it if it ever gets to court - think I will play the long game just now....playing them at their own game!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went down the othe route. I made a counter offer, will update when/if they accept.

 

But 70% from a DCA is pretty poor i reckon. 70-75% from the original creditor is fair enough. But its probably an opening gambit from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that if a DCA *has* purchased the debt outright, it'll be at approx 5-10% of the value, your paying 50% gives them a whacking profit margin :-(

 

I would always start at a lower amount and then up it with a final second offer.

 

If the debt is just assigned then its Amex who will decide how much and they'll want most if not all of the debt repaid :-(

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you tell if the debt has been sold or assigned?

 

Sometimes its difficult, the DCA's tend not to want you to know for some reason.... basically if you have a notice of assignment that states they have purchased the rights and obligations of the debt then on face value they have purchased the debt... anything from a DCA stating we are acting as agents and they obviously havent purchased.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info shadow.

 

I think my debt with newmans is under the "acting as agents" premise. Damn.

 

Furthermore, looking at my credit file, I can only see Amex on there, and not Newman.

 

If you look around the amex forum section you'll see that they very rarely give away control, they get involved at all stages in chasing the debt.

 

It still doesnt hurt to start low and increase the offer later on, just be sure to head the offer "without prejudice save as to costs" so they cant use it in court against you.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shadow.

 

I havent put "without prejudice save as to costs" on my letter, but I have made them an offer, without acknowledging the debt, eg said this account is in dispute etc, but to stop you hassling me, i will give u £x. I hope this is ok.

 

Judging by what you have said, it will be difficult to get a lower offer away with these. I was thinking I would get away. 50%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shadow.

 

I havent put "without prejudice save as to costs" on my letter, but I have made them an offer, without acknowledging the debt, eg said this account is in dispute etc, but to stop you hassling me, i will give u £x. I hope this is ok.

 

Judging by what you have said, it will be difficult to get a lower offer away with these. I was thinking I would get away. 50%.

 

You just never know.... so many variables...

 

What the month is looking like for the bank, near quarters end for reporting and final push for any cash possible etc etc.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No joy on my F&F with Newman/Amex. They have just re-iterated what they said last time as there "best offer". They extended the deadline for this.

 

Any ideas what i do now? Do i keep increasing my offer until they bite? Ignore them for a bit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you increase the offer until they bite you may find that they bite at 100%. I think you have to play harder. Remind them that the CCA if unenforceable, state that under the circumstances the f&f offer was generous, withdraw the offer and cease with the monthly payments if you haven’t yet done so. Actually, on that last part, bear in mind that they can default you for non payment. Default is not a nice place to be. On the upside if they’ve defaulted you already then it’s game on.

Edited by ManSizedRooster
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ManSizedRooster.

 

I've told them loads of times that the CCA is unenforceable but they say it is.

 

I'm not current paying them anything, but I'm noticing the amount on Newmans letters are going up.

 

They have defaulted me, and wont withdraw the default even if they accept a F&F, instead they said it would be marked as "satisfied".

 

Sort of stalemate at the moment.

 

I cant really write back and say "what's the lowest" you will go? Stonewalling me at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look around the amex forum section you'll see that they very rarely give away control, they get involved at all stages in chasing the debt.
Almost certainly because the Debts are not theirs to sell.

 

Their US Parent Company having Securitised them 100% over in the good old U S of A.

 

So, they have no option but to keep the Debts and chase for every penny, because they have to pay if the deal turns sour.

 

Next question, when they take you to Court, ask them if they own the Debt...and watch them shuffle and squirm.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Edited by banker_rhymes_with
Tripe-O
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if anyone has had a F&F accepted under 70%?

 

I reckon I'll ignore them, then they'll write to say the deadline for F&F has passed, and they will start court action.

 

So I dont know what to do, as I dont want to go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The deal on the table is currently 70%.

 

Can I write and say I will offer you 50% or 1% per month for x years, or is it too confusing for them?

 

Is 70% good with these guys?

 

On the basis of the CCA they have sent me it is unenforceable as its an application form. However, I wouldnt put it past them to take me to court anyway.

 

Any tips?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Billyray!

 

The deal on the table is currently 70%.
Don't count on that offer being genuine.

 

It's almost certainly a trick to...

 

 

  • Get you to call them so they can work their DCA telephone magic on you.

 

  • Get you to say what you can pay, so they'll know you have at least that to grab (they'll use that against you in Court if you plead poverty).

 

  • Get you to say something they can use against you (see above).

 

Note my comments above about how Arsemex are usually unable to sell these Debts because Arsemex no longer owns them. This rather neatly explains why they are so hostile...they probably have something to hide themselves.

 

Getting them to admit that is the prize!

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...