Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ and can I be chased for an old debt??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I was wondering if anyone could please give me some info?

 

When I was younger (about 10 years ago) I got a credit card when I was at uni. Being young and stupid I managed to get myself into debt and defaulted on my credit card. The debt was eventually the subject of a CCJ in 2004.

 

I recently received a letter to my mother-in-laws house regarding this!! I don't even live there and I've no idea how they got this address. The letter states that there is an outstanding amount of £500+ (sorry I don't have the letter to hand) and this must be paid immediately to rectify my credit file. It also advises it is subject to a CCJ and therefore MUST be paid.

 

I have just checked my credit file and looked at the court information section and it states the following

 

Type: County Court Judgement Paid

Court Date: 16/08/2004

Amount: (which is less than is quoted on the letter I received)

Date satisfied:03/04/2006

 

I thought I had paid this off and in fact have heard nothing about this in over 4 or 5 years. Are they allowed to still chase me?

 

Any help would be much appreciated. I'm trying (and mostly succeeding) in being much more careful with my finances and my partned would be really annoyed that I owe anything like this as we are saving for a house. I'm worried bailiffs will come to the house (or worse to my mother-in laws house).

 

Many Thanks

 

fiesty

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a fishing expedition.

 

If you had a CCJ, and it was satisfied then you should have been given a form by the courts to state this.(I did when I had one many moons ago) If you have lost / did not receive one, you may be able to contact the court in question to enquire on the status and get a satisfaction certificate.

 

In England and Wales, a Certificate of Satisfaction , stating that the debt has been paid, can be obtained from the County Court in which the case was heard. The fee is £10. If the debt was not paid through the court, for example, it was paid direct to the lender, the court will require evidence that the Judgment has been satisfied , i.e. paid. The court will need the case number of the action. The number and the name of the court are shown on the Register of County Court Judgments, under your name, and on your credit reference file. The court will then issue a Certificate of Satisfaction to you and automatically inform the Registry Trust that the debt has been paid. There is no statutory time limit within which the court must do this.

 

As a matter of interest for the rest of the peeps, which company is chasing you?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've left the letter at a friends and will pick it up later to check the company.

 

I don't honestly know if it is paid - I thought so but did not receive any letter from the court. Thanks so much for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The company involved is Howard Cohen Ltd. I do remember dealing witrh these previously regarding this but as mentioned have had no coontact from them within the last 5 years or so - are they allowed to just pick this back up?

 

Also the Court case number they have provided is different to the one on my credit file.

 

Is it possible this is now being chased because it is coming up to 6 years since the Judgement was handed down? Is it correct that they can no longer chase after 6 years?

 

Thanks so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must seek permission from the court to pursue a CCJ after six years, showing good reason why they haven't enforced it previously. Permission is very rarely given but in your case it's marked as satisfied.

 

Write back to them quoting the CCJ number on your credit file stating that it is satisfied & that you have no knowledge of the one they are referring to. If there was a second CCJ it would show on your credit file so it looks as if it's a clerical error on their part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I'd really apprecaite spme help. Apologiesw if this is doesn't read well but I'm a bit upset.

 

I received a call from my boyfriend's father today saying a man had been to the house with a letter for me. He'd refused to say what it was regarding. I don't even live at their house!

 

I've opened it and it says I need to contact this guy urgently regarding my debt owing on a CCJ for a Topshop account. I don't even know what this debt is. The only one I was aware of was a CCJ on a credit card (which is on my credit file as satisfied - see above). There are no other CCJ's on my credit file so I don't know what he's talking about??

 

I'm really upset as I'm going to have to contact this person in case he pays another visit to my bpyfriends parents. I am really embarassed as I know they will ask me what the letter is about.

 

Im also annoyed as the card says 'despite repeated efforts to conatct you' - I've received only one letter!!

 

Does anyone please have any advice?

 

Thanks so much

 

p.s. incidentally he was fropm the Lewis Group -?? not same people who originally sent me the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - it was Northampton Court I will phone them tomorrow.

Is there anyway I can stop them going to my boyfriend's parents?

 

Do they still have to prove I owe the debt even if there is a CCJ filed?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...