Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result..topic title updated.   Andy
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

princess5 and PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5164 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello im in need of some desperate help as i paid kubic investments £600 to get my loan written off for me and 9 months later have not been able to get hold of these people to find out whats going on with my account as having threating letters from lloyds bank now wanting the loan payments, a natasha tate was dealing with my account and has since resigned from the company saying kubic were riping people off and the loans couldnt be written off, im scared now as owe alot of money as have stopped paying since may 2009 now, and these people have now wrecked my credit rating!! which was good before signing up for this service, im not sure what my rights are now and what to do next? please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

first, put it down to experience and second get a s78 request off to each of your creditors and this site will help you to sort things out (but will not guarantee to "write off your debts"

 

you have been conned

 

look in the templates section for the letter to send to each creditor i would have given it to you myself but i just changed computer after a crash and lost all my files

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh thats not good then!! where do i get one of these forms? also have high interest on this loan as borrow 8 grand but they state ill end up paying 20 grand back to lloyds?? this is wrong surely??

Edited by princess5
forgot
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh thats not good then!! where do i get one of these forms?

 

go to the top of the forum under debt issues and you will find a file full of template letters

you want the one for requesting a copy of your credit agreement

 

someone may well post the direct link to it shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please ammend paragragh 1 to suit. ie s77 Fixed sum credit such as loans, s78 Running account credit such as credit cards & catalogues and s79 Hire agreements.

 

 

Your Address

 

Date

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account/Reference Number 4563210025897412

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

(DELETE THIS BELOW IF YOU ARE SENDING THE LETTER TO THE ORIGNAL CREDITOR AS OPPOSED TO A DEBT COLLECTION AGENCY)

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

endorse the back of the postal order

 

S78 CCA request fee

 

send by recorded delivery

 

Start a new thread for each debt when you get something back from them to get best advice

 

as a general rule make sure you keep ALL envelopes with inbound letters and staple the envelope to the back of the letter

 

keep a seperate file for each date and keep it in date order ,

 

make sure you keep a copy of all letters you write

 

send all letters (unless advised otherwise) by getting a proof of posting slip stamped (free) and staple that to the back of your outbound letters

 

as they say in legal circles this is all "belt and braces" stuff

 

do NOT talk to them on the phone, if they ring you, refuse to give them security details and tell them that you will only correspond in writing

 

STICK TO THIS RULE

 

you are in good hands

 

you will need a scanner and you should download Tinypics or photbucket to enable you to upload documents for others to look through

 

always take your personal details account number and actual amounts out when posting the documents online

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive done all this though under the company that i paid £600 for, so does this mean i need to send all the paperwork they have done to the bank again?

 

no, if YOU have what the creditors have sent back as your credit agreements then just post them up on seperate threads for us to advise you on

 

otherwise yes- best to start again im afraid

 

name the threads princess1 v mnba and so on

 

state on each thread what other correspondence you have received so far from the creditor such as default notices etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i shall send copies to the banks solicitors again, i havent received any agreements through from the bank at all and sent affidavids also to the bank, all ive got from the bank is letters to pay the loan amount, also this site wont let me post a new thread

Edited by princess5
Link to post
Share on other sites

excellent thank you i shall send all the documents back to lloyds again and see what happens

 

i am a bit concerned with your phrase ||" send all the documents back to them!!

 

what is it you are proposing to send them

 

i am talking about a single letter (s78 request for your credit agreement)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...