Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
So you had until 18th October to pay it. You didn't. So you're stuck with a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years. There is no way out of this. As far as the court is concerned you were given a chance to defend the case with the court papers and a clear deadline for doing so, but chose not to - lost case. You were then given a clear deadline to pay the money by, but chose to defy the court - CCJ. Even if you pay it's too late to get rid of the CCJ Silver lining! I've been on this forum for eight years and I've never seen a parking company enforce judgement for a single ticket. It's just not worth their while. So simply don't pay. Not paying = CCJ, paying = CCJ, so you might as well not pay. -
1 Date of the infringement 17/11/23 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 24/11/23 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received 26/11/23 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes - in and out of the barrier 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No 7 Who is the parking company? Britannia 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Waitrose, Berkhamsted, Herts For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. no, dont think so There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE front_compressed.pdf -
By BankFodder · Posted
Please damp eyed for a reply later on. We will draft a letter to the hire purchase company and threatened legal action -
By BankFodder · Posted
Let's try again – when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion? **Enter date here** what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained **enter figure in pounds sterling here or approximate figure here** -
ive had my report done...... So the summary say's that the car has not been adequately maintained according to manufacturer standards. It has no evidence of a cambelt which he said should be every 60 months. The car is a 2017. It only has 2 recorded services in its life. He said both front shocks are leaking, MOT failure. Rear shock has bump stop perished. The front tyres are worn on the inner edges. He said there is a considerable gearbox oil leak which is noticeable. He has said there is a cylinder 4 misfire which is evident and has resulted in engine management light on. Cannot be road tested due to the way it is running. He said it has been caused by incorrect or lack of proper maintenance. So now what do i do?
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
-
-
Post in Some advice on buying a used car
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
It always leads to tears!
used car.mp4
-
-
Pizza delivery insurance
BankFodder posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Pizza delivery insurance.mp4
Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4-
-
- 2 replies
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 4584 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London NW11 7PE
Recommended Posts