Jump to content


style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 934 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

evening all,

 

I apologise if this has been covered before.

 

Someone I know has had a bailiff chasing him for a magistrates fine, the bailiff hasn't levied or been into the house.

 

If he pays the fine directly to the court (i.e online) will this cancel the warrant and hence the bailiffs authority to seize goods (i.e his fees then become small claims territory?)

 

Many thanks

 

Matt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
evening all,

 

I apologise if this has been covered before.

 

Someone I know has had a bailiff chasing him for a magistrates fine, the bailiff hasn't levied or been into the house.

 

If he pays the fine directly to the court (i.e online) will this cancel the warrant and hence the bailiffs authority to seize goods (i.e his fees then become small claims territory?)

 

Recent posts by others who have been in a similar situation suggest that the Court returns any payments made by cheque.

 

Many thanks

 

Matt

 

PT


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry Ploddertom, maybe I'm being thick here, but did you mean that if you pay by cheque they will return it, I'm going to pay online.

 

Many thanks

 

Madmatt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi madmatt, yes I suspect that is what he meant. And I conclude that he suggests online payment may be more successful although I cannot guarantee that!

One observation I note is that in your OP it is someone you know who has a problem, in your last post it is you who is going to pay online. Freudian slip? :)

I'd be interested to know if there where any other personal circumstances that may be of interest? Such as benefits, disability, illness etc.

Either way, good luck and best wishes.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry Ploddertom, maybe I'm being thick here, but did you mean that if you pay by cheque they will return it, I'm going to pay online.

 

Many thanks

 

Madmatt

 

I meant any way you pay.

 

PT


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening everyone,

 

Been a while since I posted on here, anyway;

 

My ex-wife has managed to get herself a speeding fine that was sent to a previous address.

 

The Bailiff, from Marstons Holdings has been handwriting the usual drivel about coming with a locksmith on the phone until I got involved,

 

She has been to the police about the threats, the bailiff has admitted that they do not hold an order to force entry and now seems to have backed off a bit.

 

My question's are;

 

a) The only bailiff I can find whose name remotely resembles the name on the paperwork is different (i.e abbreviated)......is this an item of interest

 

b) The name that appears on the register is listed as working for M^&%tons group and she claims to work for M*&stons holdings, again is this of interest

 

c) She has been discussing the case with my ex-sister in-law and my son, is this a potential breach of the DPA?

 

 

Many thanks in advance for your valued opinions

 

Madmatt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has she paid the speeding fine?


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Enforcement Agent holds a magistrates warrant, no further "warrant" to force entry is needed as the power to force entry is contained within the warrant he already holds.

 

No, the name thing is not an issue. Many people are registered for an EA certificate using full names and often enforce using a more commonly used name. But it is worth checking it is actually him and that he does hold a certificate.

 

Regarding the DPA, the EA can state who he is, the company he works for, what he is there to enforce, how he is going to enforce it and ways to stop enforcement. He shouldn't be giving balances out to 3rd parties though without the debtors permission.

 

Marston holdings and Marston's group are one and the same.

 

And if this is indeed a hmcts fine for speeding, then the bit about a locksmith.....isn't drivel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies, with regard to the name issue they have modified/changed their surname....with regard to the DPA, the bailiff and the office dicussed full details with third parties...

 

Marstons have now admitted they have not got a paragraph 15 (Force entry) warrant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Marstons have now admitted they have not got a paragraph 15 (Force entry) warrant

 

I am sorry but what is a Paragraph 15 Forced Entry warrant !!

 

With an unpaid court fine, there is NO provision for a separate warrant to 'force entry'. The reason for this being that the warrant of control itself permits the right to Force Entry.

 

I will repeat one more time.....if the debt being enforced in an unpaid magistrate court fine, then the is no requirement for a separate 'forced entry' warrant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for your replies, with regard to the name issue they have modified/changed their surname....with regard to the DPA, the bailiff and the office dicussed full details with third parties...

 

Marstons have now admitted they have not got a paragraph 15 (Force entry) warrant

 

Who was the third party and what is their connection to the case?

 

Yes, they will fully admit they don't have a paragraph 15 "order" as they don't need one. Just forget about needing a separate warrant, you will just waste your time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...