Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I need advice please, Back in November 2018 we parked at The Southgate McDonald’s/Starbucks car park at Stansted before getting our flight.I parked at Starbucks to walk to McDonald’s. I have received letters over the years and have never acknowledged any of them . I now have a CCJ against me as I didn’t think that it was real so never answered My latest letter from dcbl is a notice of debt recovery unpaid county court judgment of £347.92.I know I should have completed the CCJ.Is there anything that I can do now or should I just pay it.Thank you bingoboy
    • Hi BankFodder, Stu007 This is correct BankFodder. Thanks for all the info Stu007, very interesting reading Regards
    • Seems as if Germany has their own version of Boris🤣   ”I know that some of you are impatient with my posts about German politics, and particularly my repeated pieces on our retarded Health Minister. I get that this can seem like inside baseball, and that all of you suffer under the very similar idiocies of your own Covid politicians. But, I just can’t help myself. Lauterbach is a special case, a truly monumental idiot who in his boundless incompetence and stupidity vastly exceeds his peers. It is my aim to make him the international symbol of pandemic derangement. I want pictures of this human incarnation of everything that is wrong with masking children and force-vaccinating millions printed next to future dictionary entries on Covidianism. We have seen the enemy, and it is this sad, stupid, Smeagol-looking loser, who thinks Eric Feigl-Ding is an authority and that clip-on bowties are fashionable.”     German Media Realise Their Health Minister is an International Laughingstock – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG The German media are waking up to the fact that their mask-loving Health Minister Karl Lauterbach is an international...
    • Guardian readers on here  trying to ignore this 🤣🤣🤣   “Was it my imagination, on Tuesday morning, that there were more than the usual number of possible Guardian readers looking down in the mouth? I don't think so. A few of them, with that hard-to-define but easy-to-recognise look of Guardianistas, appeared unusually pensive. Had some momentous event occurred that had made them question their prejudices? Later in the morning, I stumbled on a possible cause. There was an article prominently displayed in the Guardian print edition and on its website under the byline of the paper's Economics Editor, Larry Elliott. Its headline ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It isn't. That's why rejoining is just a pipe dream.'”   STEPHEN GLOVER: Why won't the Tories trumpet the successes of Brexit when even the economics editor of the Guardian hails its benefits? | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK STEPHEN GLOVER: The headline of Larry Elliott's Guardian article ran: 'I've got news for those who say Brexit is a disaster: It...  
    • So I ask you –"when did you first have sight of this policy containing this exclusion?" And you answer – "when I brought the policy" And then I ask you – "what is the value of the damage your caravan has sustained" and you answer that it is probably a complete write-off    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

BT Evening and Weekend changes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5035 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I wonder if anyone can offer advice.

My daughter moved to a rented house in rural East Anglia last August. The house is about 4.5 miles from the nearest exchange. She wanted BT broadband so had a BT phone line re-connected at the house. The BT broadband web site said she should get 2 mbps and she went ahead and ordered BT broadband. It took several visits from BT openreach, each time saying that she was connected to BT broadband when in fact she was not. After much help from the BT MDs office, BT openreach finally conceded that the phone line would not support broadband. She was fully refunded for her advanced broadband rental.

My daughter rarely uses her BT phone line as she always has plenty of free minutes on her mobile.

My question is, can she use the change in BTs evening and weekend terms to terminate her phone contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I cannot help on the question asked.

 

But would this not do

 

 

Unlimited Anytime Calling Plan

 

tariff_anytime.giftariff_ball2.png FREE for 3 months

 

 

£4.99 a month thereafter

plus £11.54 line rental

(12 month contract)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is a decent price to pay per month, and she could use her mobile for all the free minutes to just other mobiles.

 

 

just a suggestion if she cannot cancel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is she still within the 28 day period.

 

Also would it not be good enough to write into customer services and complaints department explain all, and asking for a cancellation, and only paying for services used so far.

 

I did it with virgin after 28days explaining my problems, and I got it all canceled along with all cost's and charges wiped out

 

Must be worth a try a least, BTW I did mine on line, from their site, but also emailed them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I get out of this contract?

The short answer is yes. On Tuesday, BT stated that if a customer can show that they are "significantly disadvantaged" by the change, then they will be permitted to leave their contract even if it still has months left to run.

We understand that if a customer states they are "unhappy" with the change, then they will be allowed to leave - and they will not be asked for lots of evidence about how they will suffer from the change.

BT is likely to do its best to try to persuade you to stay, perhaps by making a new offer. But if you want to leave, you should be able to.

How would I go about leaving?

Call BT on their customer service number: 0800 800 150.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be prepared for them to dissuade her - and to stick to her guns. I'm assuming that there is now now BB on the line, as this would need to be cancelled and the get-out of BT's charge changes would not apply here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I wonder if anyone can offer advice.

My daughter moved to a rented house in rural East Anglia last August. The house is about 4.5 miles from the nearest exchange. She wanted BT broadband so had a BT phone line re-connected at the house. The BT broadband web site said she should get 2 mbps and she went ahead and ordered BT broadband. It took several visits from BT openreach, each time saying that she was connected to BT broadband when in fact she was not. After much help from the BT MDs office, BT openreach finally conceded that the phone line would not support broadband. She was fully refunded for her advanced broadband rental.

My daughter rarely uses her BT phone line as she always has plenty of free minutes on her mobile.

My question is, can she use the change in BTs evening and weekend terms to terminate her phone contract.

 

The main reason for getting connected was to have broadband which she cannot get now so she may have a good chance but will have to press the point home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The changes only affect those who are NOT on an Anytime plan - the Off-Peak time band is being massaged, currently from 1800-0600 Mon-Fri. to 1900-0700 Mon-Fri (and Sat-Sun all day).

 

In only disadvantages those who receive free off-peak calls, insofar as the start time is pushed back 60 minutes. So the number of cheap hours remains the same, but the number of people benefiting from cheap calls from 0600-0700 won't be the same as those missing 1800-1900.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be prepared for them to dissuade her - and to stick to her guns. I'm assuming that there is now now BB on the line, as this would need to be cancelled and the get-out of BT's charge changes would not apply here.

 

Broadband was never installed as she is to far away from the exchange.

Just spoken to BT asking them to cancel the phone line and the customer support lady by the name of Tanya has said that she can cancel the evening and weekend calling plan but she cannot cancel the line rental as it is two separate contracts, therefore my daughter is tied into BT line rental until July 23rd. She said that this has all been agreed by OFCOM and she would not tell me lies as it is more than her jobs worth. But she did offer me £36 off my next bill!!! So now I am confused as to what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I'm confused. WHY would she have opted for the free evening and weekend calls package if in your words; "she rarely uses her BT phone line"?

 

The only reason for BT releasing you from the contract is because it disadvantages you. Anyone on an Anytime package could not claim this - because they get all standard calls included, the shift in the Peak/Off-Peak rate will have no effect.

 

HOWEVER if he only has the free weekend OR free off-peak AND weekend package, then she CAN cancel, as she'll be forced to pay for calls that would otherwise be included from 1800-1900. IT all hinges on the package she has.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the argument could be that if she knew she would not get broadband she would never have had the telephone line connected. I think Ofcom may a regulatory body with no powers whatsoever like most regulatory bodies.

However when she left her former residence and if she was not going to get another BT line she would have been subjected to a disconnection fee so maybe the £36 is a bonus.

If at the end of the 12 month contract she disconnects please be aware that she may incur a disconnection charge. She will need to check on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFCOM is not a consumer-facing regulator, it is an industry watchdog (and a sleepy one at that) so on both counts not much assistance to consumers.

 

An argument based on consequential issues (I need this to do that) involves different rules. Call BT Broadband and ask for a connection. They'll certainly arrange for a line to be installed and cancel BB if it isn;t to your liking, but since there's nothing wrong with the phone line itself, this won;t be cancelled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess the argument could be that if she knew she would not get broadband she would never have had the telephone line connected. I think Ofcom may a regulatory body with no powers whatsoever like most regulatory bodies.

However when she left her former residence and if she was not going to get another BT line she would have been subjected to a disconnection fee so maybe the £36 is a bonus.

If at the end of the 12 month contract she disconnects please be aware that she may incur a disconnection charge. She will need to check on this.

 

The only way that will work is if the telephone line and the broadband were ordered as one, as a 'package'. Then the supplier has to fulfil both for the contract to be fulfilled. If they can't supply the broadband, then the contract is voided; they are not technically in breach of contract as bb is "subject to survey"

 

Of course for the survey to take place, the line has to be working first. Bit of a shambles really, but that's the network we have in the century we live in. ADSL doesn't work over long distances (more than a couple of miles and it's doubtful, more than three miles or so and it's very unlikely)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...