Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RLP-ARGOS advice please


Coachdriver01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

Before i start i'd just like to say i'm not here to be judged by other users i would just like a little advice.

 

Ok down to business

 

I got a part time xmas temp job at Argos in November after losing my previous job in July through ill health.

 

After xmas when things were extremely hard financially and my contracted hours being dropped to 6 hours a week I allegedly stole a few high value items from Argos with the intention of selling them on in an attempt to keep my head above water.

the police were called. The items allegedly stolen were rerturned. The returned items were in totally un-used condition but without the boxes as they had been removed from the boxes prior to removing them from the store.

 

I received a caution from the police as the claimed stolen items were returned and had my employment with Argos terminated.

 

I have now received a letter from RPL claiming....

 

Total value of goods/monies/services-------------£1003.95

Recovered goods/monies/service-----------------£ 0.00

Value of unrecovered or unfit for resale goods----£ 1003.95

Staff/management time-------------------------£ 50.00

Admin costs------------------------------------£ 0.00

Security and surveillance------------------------£ 0.00

TOTAL -----------------------------------------£ 1053.95

 

If i pay within 21days i get a huge £10 discount.

 

I'd just like a little advice on what i should do before I call them, considering i returned all the stolen items.

Yes i stole the stuff, yes i admitted it, yes i agree to some losses for Argos' but should i really have to pay the full price for all the items.

 

Also if argos are saying that the goods are not saleable therefore i should pay for them then shouldnt i be entitled to the goods ????????

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Edited by Coachdriver01
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't call them unless you can record the phone call. Write recorded delivery.

 

If they are claiming the cost of the goods, then you have a right to those goods.

 

Again, this is a case of conviction and sentence outside of the law, they cannot convict you even if you admit guilt, only a court of law can do that.

 

You should write and ask for a complete breakdown of the bill including a list of items claimed 'unrecovered/unfit for resale'. Ask for a listing seperately of the unrecovered from the unfit for resale items.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response.

 

I already have a list of items from Argos which totals £5 more than RLP are stating it is.

 

Should I challenge the fact that Argos received everything back so the costs should be a fraction of what they're asking or should I just ask for the goods and pay what they are demanding.

 

The only reason the items are possibly un-resaleable is the fact they do not have boxes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which of course they aren't, they will probably put them in a sale.

 

Is the bill representative of the retail cost of the items?

 

Have you got a banning order from them and does it mention 'Stealing' or words to that affect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the bill represents the retail value if the items at the time. At least one of the items in now discontinued.

 

I was banned from Argos whilst I was suspended on full pay awaiting a disciplinary hearing. After the hearing and my dismissal the letter I got from Argos stated the reasoning for my dismissal but did not mention any banning order

Link to post
Share on other sites

Electriceel, I assume as you have cast the first stone, you must be free from from sin, as the saying goes. But are you? Have you never broken a Law; never exceeded the speed limit; found cash in the street and not handed it in; not pointed out that you have been overpaid when been given change; kept quiet about something because the offender was a mate or a relative-etc etc.

 

In no way am I condoning what Coachdriver did. But do you think it would be right that a company like Argos, who could claim against an insurance policy for just such an eventuality, and who would be able to lessen their loss by writing the amount off to tax

are acting lawfully by charging so much more than a Court would charge were it CDs first offence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking, the loss Argos has made is not the full retail price, but the wholesale price they bought in at, less the income from selling them off cheaply, either to the public or staff.

 

I would be tempted to ignore RLP letters, or at the very most asked them to prove the loss they are claiming, especially as RLP not acting for free, and a good portion of what they are asking would be their recovery charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be more inclined to put this to Argos and send a copy of RLPs demand.

My guess is that Argos would be hard pressed to substantiate why RLP are demandiong the full prices when the goods have been returned.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its obvious why they are saying that.

We had a similar case here in respect of Boots.When the person contacted Boots-their response was interesting.

I think the important thing here is that your letter to Boots is looked into by the right person/persons to respond.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well nothing worse then getting caught I know first hand. I got a similar problem but not as bad.

 

Me and my girl friend went into Asda doing our shopping.We had some sushi from outside the store that we started eating once we got in the store. Put the empty sushi tray in one of the rubbish piles (it was late so they had loads of rubbish lying around). We get to the till after carefully calculating what we got (were students) I go to get some asprin for this head ace I couldn't get rid of.

 

Well that put us over our budget so I thought the hell with it I'll just take it. One item they won't notice only £1.50 anyway. So we get to the exit and the security asked me if I took anything.

 

I say no so he asks if I can come with him and not really wanting to run for it I go with him.

 

He takes me into a little room asks me again and I say no. Then he says I'm going to giv u one last chance so I think the hell with it and say yeah ok I took something. I take the aspirin out of my pocket and he then tells me that he only thought I took the sushi.

 

I tell him it wasn't from the store but am now caught with aspirin. He tells me he didn't know I took that so I gav my self away.

 

So I get a 6 month ban he take a pic of me and I fill in a few forms.

 

About a week later I get a letter say I owe £150 for security coast. This guy spoke to me for a bout 5 mins how could that cast £150.

 

I gave him my mum's address and my name.

 

So should I pay even though the asprin was not damaged in any way and was returned before I even left the store?

 

I'm thinking no but they are saying the amount will go up if I don't pay.

 

Help please :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

general advice is not to pay

 

DONT EVER PHONE THEM, unless you can record it, send all letters recordered delivery

 

couple of things should help.

 

What retail loss company is listed on the top of the letter?

is there a break down of costs? - if not request one

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well nothing worse then getting caught I know first hand. I got a similar problem but not as bad.

 

Me and my girl friend went into Asda doing our shopping.We had some sushi from outside the store that we started eating once we got in the store. Put the empty sushi tray in one of the rubbish piles (it was late so they had loads of rubbish lying around). We get to the till after carefully calculating what we got (were students) I go to get some asprin for this head ace I couldn't get rid of.

 

Well that put us over our budget so I thought the hell with it I'll just take it. One item they won't notice only £1.50 anyway. So we get to the exit and the security asked me if I took anything.

 

I say no so he asks if I can come with him and not really wanting to run for it I go with him.

 

He takes me into a little room asks me again and I say no. Then he says I'm going to giv u one last chance so I think the hell with it and say yeah ok I took something. I take the aspirin out of my pocket and he then tells me that he only thought I took the sushi.

 

I tell him it wasn't from the store but am now caught with aspirin. He tells me he didn't know I took that so I gav my self away.

 

So I get a 6 month ban he take a pic of me and I fill in a few forms.

 

About a week later I get a letter say I owe £150 for security coast. This guy spoke to me for a bout 5 mins how could that cast £150.

 

I gave him my mum's address and my name.

 

So should I pay even though the asprin was not damaged in any way and was returned before I even left the store?

 

I'm thinking no but they are saying the amount will go up if I don't pay.

 

Help please :???:

 

Hi suggest you start your own thread then paste a link here:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if unsure how to PM then please click here

 

joncris why not add the link to your sig?

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok time for an update

Wrote to Argos regards RLP's claims. Never heard back but got a letter from RLP stating that Argos had forwarded the letter onto them.

 

Am now in receipt of another letter from RLP stating that because the goods where unboxed then they are not resaleable, although i will challenge this as one item was completely sealed and intact in a box.

 

They go on to say that i would be paying for the damages caused to the goods (removing boxes is classed as damage) and not for ownership of the goods, as they are unfit for resale. A payment of moeny in these circumstances does not lead to a transfer of the title for the goods. It merely compensates Argos for their financial loss. There is no contract of sale and therefore the goods will remain in Argos' possesion.

 

Again is the demand for money via either credit card or installments and now an extra option of Alternative Dispure Resolution as a more suitable option than litigation ??? Which involves me supplying a written account of my version of events. Supplying evidence that i intend to rely on in my defence and confirmation that i agree to negotiate a settlementand/or pay the costs of the ADR which are typically £150/300 per party.

Not a clue as to what all that means

 

So, apart from disputing the one item that was totally boxed and sealed what should be my next step?. I have the standard 21 days to respond before RLP will seek instruction from Argos on the next action against me

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Again is the demand for money via either credit card or installments and now an extra option of Alternative Dispure Resolution as a more suitable option than litigation ??? Which involves me supplying a written account of my version of events. Supplying evidence that i intend to rely on in my defence and confirmation that i agree to negotiate a settlementand/or pay the costs of the ADR which are typically £150/300 per party.

Not a clue as to what all that means

 

 

I think they are trying to say that it would be better to settle this out of court, which they are probably right in saying.

 

However, a lot of people use this to convince people to settle even if they would have had a good case in court - like PPCs saying "if you dont pay in X days we will go to court costing you £XXX plus fees"

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they appear to be doing is offering an Altrnative Dispute Resolution, where you have to give them any reasons you would use if this came to court.

In other words they want you to supply them their case against you.

 

Personally I would just send one final letter saying you will not be paying them anything unless ordered to by a court, and that you will not enter into any further correspondence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Ok just recieved another letter from RLP confirming that one of the items returned was indeed in a condition to be resold, as i informed them that it was, and the cost of that item has been deducted from the total.

 

Have now the standard 21 days to pay/arrange terms

 

Whats the next step. Do i ignore them and see what the next step form them will be. What is that likely to be

 

Thanks

Edited by Coachdriver01
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The latest letter from RLP as follows

 

We have responded to your correspondence on this matter, however you have failed to settle this claim subsequently.

Our client has suffered loss as a result of your wrongful actions and is entitled to compensation for their loss. We take this oppurtunity to advise you that we are not prepared to enter into any further correspondence on any of the point you have raised thus far as we have already addressed the issues raised which have a legal basis.

Should this case proceed to the civil Court and we have to issue an application for Summary Judgement based on the fact that your defence has no legal basis and therefore no likelihood of success, we shall add the costs incurred onto the amount claimed from you which will increase the amount outstanding considerably.

Our client is prepared to issue court proceeding in this matter to recover the full amount of their claim plus any court fees. other allowable legal costs and all interest which has been accruing on a daily basis at a rate of 8% per annum. The total amount claimed in court will significantly exceed the amount shown above.

Your options now are to :

Pay the amount outstanding by credit/debit card

Set up an installment plan

Write asking for the matter to be tried by a civil court judge. This will enable you to defend your case, submit appropriate evidence and attend court to confirm your own evidence and hear the evidence of our client

Failure to settle the claim or respond, within 21 days from the date of this letter will result in next stage action being taken against you without further notice.

 

So thats the latest, any further advice ? do i just pay and make it go away or are they likely to stick to what they claim will happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest letter from RLP as follows

 

We have responded to your correspondence on this matter, however you have failed to settle this claim subsequently.

 

Our client has suffered loss as a result of your wrongful actions and is entitled to compensation for their loss. We take this oppurtunity to advise you that we are not prepared to enter into any further correspondence on any of the point you have raised thus far as we have already addressed the issues raised which have a legal basis.

 

Should this case proceed to the civil Court and we have to issue an application for Summary Judgement based on the fact that your defence has no legal basis and therefore no likelihood of success, we shall add the costs incurred onto the amount claimed from you which will increase the amount outstanding considerably.

 

Our client is prepared to issue court proceeding in this matter to recover the full amount of their claim plus any court fees. other allowable legal costs and all interest which has been accruing on a daily basis at a rate of 8% per annum. The total amount claimed in court will significantly exceed the amount shown above.

 

Your options now are to :

 

Pay the amount outstanding by credit/debit card

 

Set up an installment plan

 

Write asking for the matter to be tried by a civil court judge. This will enable you to defend your case, submit appropriate evidence and attend court to confirm your own evidence and hear the evidence of our client

 

Failure to settle the claim or respond, within 21 days from the date of this letter will result in next stage action being taken against you without further notice.

So thats the latest, any further advice ? do i just pay and make it go away or are they likely to stick to what they claim will happen

 

I've quoted as the original was a bit small for me to read.

 

What loss? They need to substantiate that claim and show what loss has been made.

 

They are also using bullying tactics with a threat of higher amount in an attempt to frighten you into paying.

 

If you are to pay full value of the goods, then the goods belong to you and not them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only way they are substantiating their claim is with the original letter which lists the RETAIL value of all the items and not the COST value to argos. And they make it appear that they are working for free as the amount they are claiming is the amount of the goods at retail value to argos so where do their costs come into it?

I have tried contacting argos stating that i believe i should only be liable for the cost price of the items as THAT is their loss and not the RETAIL value but it would seem that they just forward my letters to RLP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...