Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unfair Debt selling Campaign 2010


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5174 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

managed to get 15 prepaid envelopes all for .......

 

sister wont be needing them so

 

enclosed a copy of oft guidelines and a brief note stating please read/learn and adhere to:D

 

signed it

NDCAD

 

SAM:pLOWELL

 

actually they were posted for a laugh,to waste their time opening repeat letters,like my sis has been getting repeat letters from them.

 

I have actually payed out for 6 letters of complaint to OFT.

 

complaints also send to MP

with a petition signed by 812

 

 

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

actually they were posted for a laugh,to waste their time opening repeat letters,like my sis has been getting repeat letters from them.

 

I have actually payed out for 6 letters of complaint to OFT.

 

complaints also send to MP

with a petition signed by 812

 

 

 

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

 

Important to view the humorous side SAM.

However, I note that you have also followed the serious route as well:

 

Quote:

 

I have actually payed out for 6 letters of complaint to OFT.

 

complaints also send to MP

with a petition signed by 812"

 

Hopefully, others will follow your excellent example!

 

AC

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I know this has been discussed on here several times and I can't find the right threads.

 

IS IT POSSIBLE TO FIND OUT HOW MUCH YOUR DEBT WAS SOLD FOR?

 

Surely this has to be information you can obtain.

 

I can see a million reasons why companies would withhold this information, but it must be available thrrough SAR. Is it?

 

What about property law which concerns sale of debts?

 

Freedom of inforamtion act.

 

help needed, thanks.

 

In short if you know what the debt was sold for (or should I say how little it was sold) you can use this as a HUGE tool for neg. or defense.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't find out. Unfortunately the sale of your debt doesn't have anything to do with you, strange as it seems. Your debt is property (in effect) belonging to your creditor. They sell that property (or in legal parlance - a chose in action) and it's their business.

Besides these bin-rummaging **** won't want you to know that they onoy paid about 10% of it's value so they can screw the rest out of some unsuspecting person

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reality the only way to find out is to be taken to court for non-payment and to request disclosure of the deed of assignment...and then its at the judges discretion to grant or deny it. The deeds are normally for multiple tranches of debt so they'll be like a formal contract that will run into millions worth of debt sold for hundreds of thousands.

 

The notice of assignment will tell you its been sold and thats all thats required under the law of property act 1925(yep serious, thats how old and ancient this law is)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

From small acorns….

I'm gonna stand up and be counted and try to progress the quite frankly barbaric practice of selling on misery when the OC has written a debt off.

I’ve enlisted a solicitor friend and Facebook entries will pop up amongst other projects.

At this stage I not looking to change the world, but just to put the message out.

Few people understand that debts are sold for pennies in the pound usually 10p the bank has already written it off, claimed back huge tax benefits and still made money.

That’s when the real misery starts when DCA attempts to turn a profit.

It really is profit from misery and the practice has to stop, I know that most on here agree with me.

The strategy is simple educate, campaign and fight for change.

We need action not talk, so although discussion is good, suggestions put into place and coordinated assaults (Non Violent) are better.

I'm working on a few draft letters to MP's and the such, help always accepted.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no debt should be sold if it is SB, or does not have enforceable paper work. Only the OC should be able to default you and register your information with the CRA's.

 

Possible legislation should be in force which obliges the OC/DCA to at least inform you of the default date from the OC, and the last time a payment was made towards the account. They can then ask all they want if its SB.

Edited by 247orbital
Link to post
Share on other sites

no debt should be sold if it is SB, or does not have enforceable paper work. Only the OC should be able to default you and register your information with the CRA's.

 

I`m with you both on your campaign. Give me a shout.

 

We should at least be able to put our side to the CRA`s BEFORE they place anything on our records. The Unilateral use of CRA`s by loan companies etc. is digusting.

 

Count me IN!!! Even if it does get violent. LOL:cool:

Edited by mark1arby
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the link that was posted should have the workings of first draft letter soon to hit MPs it is after all an Election year.

 

How do you go about press releases highlighting the practice????

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not sign my petiton to stop DCAs marking your files, I believe the whole debt buying issue should be heavily legislated and stopped as it doesnt help people - only the companies and is very one sided.

 

Here is the link to my petition

 

Petition to: state that only the original creditor can place a negative marker on your credit file. | Number10.gov.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not sign my petiton to stop DCAs marking your files, I believe the whole debt buying issue should be heavily legislated and stopped as it doesnt help people - only the companies and is very one sided.

 

Here is the link to my petition

 

Petition to: state that only the original creditor can place a negative marker on your credit file. | Number10.gov.uk

 

Signed It Days Ago!!! I agree entirely. There should be a way Wecan have our sayBefore this goes on our files.

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark, perhaps the legislation could read

 

"A debt which has been unpaid for 3 months receives a primary default, this should NOT be placed on a customers credit rating until a further three months has elapsed to allow negotiations to take place. The letter must clearly state the following (I fully believe we need to close as many of their loopholes as possible in getting legislation drafted)

 

"On xxx date an agreement was entered into between xxx and xxx. On xxx date no payment had been received on said agreement for three months, therefore a primary default will be registered on xxx date with the CRAs..." If no payment is received after xxx date or no negotiations have taken place a secondary default will be registered on xxx date."

 

By giving three months between the two defaults it will stop them messing around and playing games... the fun then will be the next part that I have thought out

 

"Any DCA placing more than 200 secondary defaults with the CRAs during a three month period will have their files audited by an independant body to see why their collections processes have failed."

 

If people want to discuss this I am happy to start a new thread on "Proposed Legislation for DCAs..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

If people want to discuss this I am happy to start a new thread on "Proposed Legislation for DCAs..."

 

I'd be interested in that thread, SG1. For example, I'd like legislation which forces DCA that buy a debt to a) declare how much they paid for it. b) limit the amount they can collect to say 10 or 15% above the paid price. c) and still conform to CCA regulations :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not read all the thread but do have an opinion. I agree with what you say but if the banks were prevented from selling a bad debt what would happen. They'd simply use a DCA as a collector paying them even more for anything they collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...